Will my client get a fair price? What partners can and can't say
A data licensing price is agreed between the company and SourceX before anything is binding, as one all-in price with SourceX's fee included. Partners never quote or estimate it. What moves value is breadth, history, outcomes and rights clarity, and the company decides whether to sign.
What can a partner honestly say about price?
Almost nothing numeric, and that is the right answer. Partners never quote, estimate or promise a price. What you can say is how price gets set: the company agrees price and terms with SourceX, the company sees one all-in price with SourceX's fee included and no separate charges, and nothing is binding until the company signs.
That is a complete and honest reply to "will my client get a fair price?" It moves the question from "what is it worth?" to "who decides, and when?", and the owner decides, before anything is signed.
How is the price of a data license actually set?
Price comes out of a sequence, not a rate card. Data licensing for company records is not a commodity with a posted rate card, so no partner should pretend otherwise.
- Qualification. SourceX checks size, history, breadth of data and rights.
- Inventory. The company lists its systems and records, which shows what could be offered.
- Terms discussion. Price and terms are agreed between the company and SourceX, including term and scope.
- Buyer review. Buyers review the described dataset and respond; once a company is deal-ready, buyers typically respond within about two weeks.
- Signature. The company signs only if price and terms work for it.
- Payment. The company receives a one-time payment, typically within about 60 days of invoicing once the buyer selects the data.
The partner appears at step zero only, as the person who introduced the company. Your reward is a share of SourceX's fee and is never deducted from what the company receives.
Which factors move value, in plain terms?
Without quoting any figure, you can tell an owner what buyers look at. This is a list of factors, not a formula.
| Factor | What it means | Why it can matter to a buyer |
|---|---|---|
| Breadth | Number of connected systems, from email to finance to engineering | Connected records show whole workflows |
| Depth of history | Years of records, including archived systems | Longer histories show how decisions evolved |
| Outcomes | Resolved tickets, won and lost deals, approvals | Outcome labels make records useful for training and evaluation |
| Rights clarity | The company created the data and can license it | Buyers need clean rights before delivery |
| Handling effort | De-identification and redaction needed | More handling can mean more work before delivery |
| Scarcity | How rare this kind of record is publicly | Researchers project that public text may become a constraint, which raises interest in non-public data |
| Exclusivity | Exclusive for AI training for an agreed term | Exclusivity is typical and shapes the commercial discussion |
On scarcity, one source is worth knowing: Epoch AI's 2024 paper projects that language models could use up the stock of public human-written text between 2026 and 2032 if trends continue. It is a forecast with wide uncertainty, so treat it as context for why interest exists, not as a statement about what any dataset is worth.
What should a partner say when asked "what is it worth?"
Keep it short, avoid any range, and send the owner to the people who can answer. A script:
Then offer two things you can do: introduce them, and suggest they bring in their own advisers early. If the owner says they need counsel first, that is a good sign, and how partners should respond when a client wants to talk to a lawyer first covers the handoff.
What should partners never do on price?
| Mistake | Why it hurts | Better move |
|---|---|---|
| Quoting a range "from similar deals" | You have no basis, and it anchors the owner | Say you cannot quote and explain the process |
| Comparing to a publicly reported deal | Different data, different scale, different terms | Avoid comparisons |
| Promising a payment date | Payment timing depends on the buyer and invoicing | Say typically within about 60 days of invoicing |
| Mentioning your own reward as a reason | Muddles the owner's view of fairness | State plainly that it comes from SourceX's fee |
| Pressuring on speed | Owners who feel rushed walk away | Let the process set the pace |
If your reward is a topic the owner wants to understand, the referral earnings calculator shows how the reward formula works using the published program, and the FAQ covers the rest. It does not estimate what a company would be paid.
Will my client get a fair price, and how will they know?
Fairness here is mostly procedural. The owner sees the price and terms, can take them to counsel, and can decline. Several protections help:
- one all-in price, with SourceX's fee included and no separate charges;
- agreement on price and terms before anything is binding;
- a company-authorized process before any data is delivered;
- the right to ask who will see the data and when, set out in who sees our data during a licensing deal.
If an introduction feels wrong, for instance the company is under pressure or cannot confirm rights, check it against red flags for a data licensing introduction. For investors, portfolio data licensing and reputational risk looks at downside beyond price.
Next step
Describe the process, not a number. When you have a US company with 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded), a documented history and an authorized sponsor, register as a partner and introduce them. A tidy introduction email template keeps the message short and free of price talk. Rewards are not guaranteed: partners earn 25% of eligible platform fees SourceX actually collects, capped at $100,000 cumulative per referred company, payable only after the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee.
- Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
- Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
- Step 3Buyer selects and paysThe buyer selects and pays for the data and SourceX receives its fee.
- Step 4You get your rewardYour share of SourceX fees becomes payable.
Common questions
Can a partner give a ballpark number to help a client decide?
No. Partners never quote prices, ranges or estimates, because no one can value records without reviewing the inventory, rights and buyer interest. A guessed range anchors the owner and can damage trust. Explain the process instead and suggest the owner involve their own advisers before agreeing to anything.
Is SourceX's fee taken out of the company's payment?
The company sees one all-in price that already includes SourceX's fee, with no separate charges. The partner reward is a share of SourceX's fee and is never deducted from what the company receives. The company is paid once, typically within about 60 days of invoicing after the buyer selects the data.
Does a publicly reported licensing deal tell us what our data is worth?
Not reliably. Reported deals involve different content, scale, rights and terms, and figures are often multi-year totals rather than annual amounts. Partners should avoid comparisons. Value for a specific company depends on its own breadth of systems, history, outcomes and the rights it can license.
When does the company agree to price?
After qualification and the data inventory, the company and SourceX agree price and terms. Nothing is binding until the company signs. If the terms do not work, the company can decline. Buyers review the described dataset, and once a company is deal-ready they typically respond within about two weeks.
Does the partner's reward depend on the price?
The reward is a share of the eligible platform fees SourceX actually collects, so it is tied to a completed, paid deal, not to a number the partner can influence. It becomes payable only after the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee. Rewards are not guaranteed.
Related pages
- 'We need to talk to our lawyer first': how partners should respond
- Referral Earnings Calculator
- SourceX referral program frequently asked questions
- Who sees our data during a licensing deal, and when?
- Red flags that make a data licensing introduction a bad idea
- Portfolio data licensing and reputational risk: a sponsor's guide to doing it cleanly
Free resources
- Portfolio data opportunity scanner — Screen several companies in one session.
- Working capital calculator — Net working capital, current ratio and quick ratio.
- Due diligence checklist generator — A tailored document request list by deal type.
- All free tools · MCP resource center
By SourceX Partnerships Team · Published 2026-10-09 · Updated 2026-10-09
Know a US company with valuable proprietary data?
Become a referral partner from anywhere we support, get your link and introduce an owner or authorized decision-maker.
Refer a company →I own a business
Explore licensing your company's data to AI developers worldwide. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.
Start an assessment