Search guides, questions and resources

A CPA firm referral fee policy sets out, once and in writing, who may accept third-party referral compensation, which clients are excluded (attest clients above all), how clients are told before any introduction, who approves each program and what records are kept. The template below lets a firm approve a program such as SourceX's once instead of case by case.

Referral fee rules depend on your profession, not on the referral program. Lawyers check their state's versions of ABA Model Rules 1.5, 5.4, 7.2 and 1.8; CPAs check AICPA ET 1.520 and their state board; registered representatives check FINRA rules with their firm; insurance producers and bankers check state law and employer policy.

A referral fee is a disclosed payment for an introduction that does not compromise a duty you owe. It starts to look like a kickback when it is hidden from the person relying on you, sways a decision you make for someone else, or falls under a law that bans paying for referrals in a regulated sector.

Fractional CFOs earn referral income mainly from cost-reduction firms that share a slice of client savings, service and software vendors that pay a bounty or a recurring share of billings, and one-time introduction rewards such as SourceX's data-licensing program. Because you see and often approve client spending, choose by conflict risk first and disclose every arrangement.

Before signing a referral partner agreement, confirm nine points: what counts as a qualified referral, the payout trigger, the reward basis and cap, attribution and duplicates, termination and tail, confidentiality, disclosure duties, tax and compliance paperwork, and governing law. For SourceX, check each one against the published program terms and your own professional rules.

A referral partner introduces a decision-maker they personally know and is paid when that introduction turns into a closed, collected deal; an affiliate partner promotes links to an audience and is paid per click, lead or sale. SourceX uses the referral model: credit goes to the first valid referrer, and rewards are paid only after SourceX receives its fee.

A referral partner makes one permission-based introduction and steps back; a commissioned sales rep prospects, pitches, negotiates and speaks for the company that pays them. SourceX referral partners introduce US companies but never quote prices, set terms or handle data, and are paid only after a deal closes and SourceX collects its fee.

A referral partner introduces a company and steps back, while a reseller buys, sells and supports a product on its own paper. At SourceX, a data-licensing introduction can only be a referral: the company signs its own license, keeps ownership of its data, and is paid directly while SourceX handles the deal.

Owning equity in a company does not by itself stop you from earning a SourceX referral reward for introducing it, but disclose the interest first. The reward is a share of SourceX's fee, never deducted from the company's proceeds; still, tell the CEO and board in writing, check fund and professional rules, and stay out of the approval.

Employees of CPA, consulting, banking and advisory firms usually need written employer approval before accepting a referral reward, and many firms require the firm itself to be the partner. Read your outside-activity policy, send a written request to compliance and do not register until you have the answer.

Yes, this article provides a referral screening worksheet specifically designed for accounting and bookkeeping firms to help identify eligible companies for referral to SourceX. It focuses on key criteria like company size, data licensing rights, and authorized sponsorship.

Yes, this page provides a referral screening worksheet specifically designed for insurance operations businesses. It helps consultants quickly assess potential companies against SourceX's core eligibility criteria.

Yes, this article provides a referral screening worksheet specifically designed for legal services operations businesses, based on SourceX's core qualification criteria. It helps advisors quickly assess if a company is a good fit for referral.

Yes, this article provides a practical referral screening worksheet tailored for marketing agencies to identify suitable companies for the SourceX data referral program. It focuses on key criteria like company size, location, data ownership, and readiness to license.

Yes, there is a referral screening worksheet specifically designed for real estate operations businesses to help you qualify potential referrals against SourceX's baseline criteria. This worksheet covers critical factors like company size, location, data licensing rights, and operational history.

Yes, this referral screening worksheet helps finance consultants quickly qualify potential SourceX referrals. It focuses on critical criteria for US financial services operations companies.

Canadian advisers can earn a reward by introducing US companies with years of operational records to SourceX. Introduce only US companies with 50+ full-time employees at peak, never share records, and check provincial professional rules, CRA reporting, GST/HST and CASL before you register.

Owners most often regret what they failed to check before closing: weak earnout terms, vague transition roles, tax structure chosen late, and assets they did not know they owned. One overlooked asset is the company's records, which an asset sale can move to the buyer along with any option to license them to AI buyers.

Only with care. Regulation S-P, the SEC's privacy rule for broker-dealers, registered investment advisers and funds, limits sharing nonpublic personal information about individual clients with nonaffiliated third parties. For a referral, get the business owner's consent first, let them direct the introduction, share business fit facts only, and ideally have them apply through your referral link.

In multi-service accounting firms the relationship partner should ask the owner and register the referral, while the CAS lead records structural observations such as years of history and systems. Clear independence and referral-fee rules first, and give the client one disclosure and one point of contact.

A remnant asset sale is a trustee's end-of-case sale of whatever the estate still holds, such as unknown claims, refunds and residual rights, to a buyer who pays one lump sum so the case can close. Books and records are usually excluded, so a debtor's operational records may still be available for a separate fit check and license.

This worksheet helps repeat partners track their referred companies, introduction status, and cumulative rewards earned against the per-company cap. It's designed to be used without handling any private company data.

A restricted entity list independence check confirms, before a CPA introduces a client in a way that could earn a referral reward, whether the firm attests for that company or its affiliates. AICPA ET 1.520 bars commissions where the firm performs audit, review, certain compilation or prospective financial information examination services, and permitted referral fees must be disclosed.

A portfolio company can usually pay a dividend to its sponsor only through an exception, or basket, in its credit agreement's restricted payments covenant, such as a general basket, a builder basket or a leverage-based basket with no default. License proceeds may first be caught by asset-sale and mandatory prepayment terms, and the executed agreement controls.

The 2026 signals, including debt maturities, private-credit stress, tariff pressure and sector disruption, point to a busy 2027 restructuring pipeline without a reliable timeline. Add a records-and-rights screen to every intake so licensable operating records reach SourceX before systems are decommissioned.

A retiring business owner with no successor can transfer the company to managers or employees, keep owning it with a hired leader, sell later or for less, or wind it down in an orderly way. Whichever path wins, the company's operational records may still produce a one-time license payment, provided they are preserved before systems shut down.

A referral earnings estimation worksheet helps partners project potential rewards based on program rules and company profiles, without including any sensitive data. It focuses on the factors that determine reward eligibility and size, such as company fit and licensing potential.

A business data inventory preparation worksheet helps partners and referred companies organize key information required for SourceX eligibility, focusing on company profile, data rights, and sponsor details. It ensures all critical criteria are met without requiring actual data content or personal information.

This worksheet guides partners through preparing an introduction email for SourceX referrals, ensuring all necessary program criteria for the referred company are considered before outreach. It focuses on gathering relevant information without collecting sensitive company or personal data.

Revenue acceleration in PE portfolio companies usually comes from five levers: pricing, retention and cross-sell, sales effectiveness, new products or markets, and add-on acquisitions. A newer, separate option is licensing historical operational records to AI developers, a one-time payment that needs no new customers, product build or AI engineering hires.

A revenue leakage audit compares signed contracts, orders, usage and invoices over several years to find unbilled or uncollected revenue. It also shows how many years and systems of records a company holds and whether customer contracts limit data use, which are early questions in a SourceX licensing fit screen.

A one-time referral fee pays once when a milestone such as a signup or first invoice is reached; a revenue share pays a percentage of what the referred customer spends, often for as long as the customer pays. SourceX blends the two: partners earn {{rate}} of eligible platform fees SourceX actually collects, capped at {{cap}} per referred company.

Revenue synergies in buy-and-build come from earning more from the combined customer base than the businesses could alone: cross-selling services, harmonizing pricing, reaching new territories and winning larger accounts. A further source sits in the records, since several add-ons' histories can form a broader licensable dataset, but treat that as one-time upside with documented rights, not a modeled synergy.

Revenue-based financing suits companies with steady recurring revenue and few hard assets: repayments flex with sales, but the total owed is fixed. Asset-based lending suits companies with receivables and inventory: usually cheaper, with borrowing-base reporting and covenants. Data license proceeds are neither: a one-time payment with nothing to repay, but uncertain timing.

During RIA aggregator integration, client records are nonpublic personal information and stay out of any data licensing discussion. Firm-level records, such as research memos, model portfolio rationales and operating procedures with personal data removed, may be reviewed with counsel, and a platform with 50+ full-time employees at peak can then be introduced to SourceX.

A strong roll-up exit strategy shows buyers what the platform has become, including the records every add-on brought with it. Map each system and archive to the legal entity that owns it, note years of history and export access, and confirm who can sign for each entity before any sale or data licensing process starts.

Rollover equity is the part of a seller's proceeds reinvested in the buyer's new holding company instead of taken as cash at closing, most often in private equity deals. It keeps the owner invested until the sponsor's exit. A data license signed before closing is the owner's decision; after closing, the sponsor decides.

In a ROT data cleanup, hold back old project, ticket and email history that scripts tag as obsolete until the owner has reviewed it. Years of connected, outcome-labeled records can be licensable. A four-question hold screen keeps deletion from becoming irreversible.

Rubric-based evaluation grades open-ended AI output against written criteria instead of a single right answer. Companies already hold this material as QA scorecards, audit checklists and review templates with scored examples, which makes them a distinct kind of potentially licensable record when they come with real work and real scores.

Only what the client has agreed to. ABA Model Rule 1.6 bars a lawyer from revealing information relating to a representation without the client's informed consent, implied authorization or a listed exception, and some bar opinions treat even the client's identity as confidential. Get informed consent first, share basic fit facts only, and never pass on documents or records.

Rule 2004 examination document requests work best when they ask for the map before the records: every system the debtor paid for, who administers each cloud tenant, where archives sit and which outside custodians, such as bookkeepers and managed IT providers, hold copies. That map shows a trustee what exists, what can still be exported and what may be licensable.

RWI underwriters usually ask how the company collects and uses personal data, who owns its code and content, what open-source and third-party material it relies on, and how it uses AI. A data license, signed or planned, should be described plainly and with a dated status so it is not treated as a known issue.

A SaaS application inventory for a licensing review adds start year, archive status, system owner and export admin to the usual IT columns. Those fields show whether a mid-sized client holds long-history systems, without anyone opening or describing a single record. MSPs keep it at metadata level.

Whether a company can retrieve its full history from a SaaS vendor depends on its contract: export formats, timing, termination assistance, retention after exit and who owns the customer data. Rules vary by contract and state, so check the signed terms and ask counsel. This is general information, not legal advice.

SaaS renewal management for portfolio companies can double as a data checkpoint: before a tool is cancelled, downgraded or consolidated, confirm how many years of history it holds and whether it can be exported. Tools with multi-year records of outcomes may merit a licensing review through SourceX before access ends.

Private SaaS companies in 2026 are valued on a multiple of ARR or of EBITDA, and the multiple moves with growth, net revenue retention, gross margin, profitability and scale. Published ranges vary by dataset and deal size, so test them against comparable sales. A one-time data license adds cash once and is not capitalized at the ARR multiple.

Sales tech stack consolidation should include one step before any license lapses: inventory the history each tool holds, such as sequences, replies, call recordings, forecast submissions and deal outcomes, decide what to export, and flag portfolio companies whose multi-year records merit a licensing review. Cutting the tool saves money; deleting the history can destroy an asset.

Before archiving or purging Salesforce data, keep whatever tax, legal and contract rules require, archive externally rather than deleting, and ask the owner whether years of activities, cases and closed opportunities have licensing value. Consultants flag the question and introduce SourceX without opening or exporting any record.