Search
Search guides, questions and resources
2382 results
- GuidesProduct sunset plan: what to do with the support and engineering history
A product sunset plan should include data retention: list the support, engineering and decision systems tied to the product, confirm admins can export them, and preserve exports before accounts lapse. For qualifying companies, that history can be reviewed for a SourceX data licensing introduction, another possible source of proceeds.
Read → - GuidesProgrammatic M&A strategy: how serial acquirers can treat acquired records as an asset
A programmatic M&A strategy is a series of smaller acquisitions in a defined theme, run by a standing team with a repeatable sourcing, diligence and integration playbook. For serial acquirers, that playbook should also decide what happens to each acquired company's historical records, because years of pre-acquisition email, tickets and finance history can be licensed when rights are clear.
Read → - GuidesProposed US federal bills on AI training data transparency: what partners should know
Proposed federal AI training data transparency bills would require AI developers to disclose, or let copyright owners discover, what material trained their models. They are proposals until enacted, so check congress.gov for current status. Whatever passes, buyers prefer suppliers that can document where licensed data came from and on what rights basis.
Read → - GuidesPros and cons of selling or licensing company data to AI developers
The main advantages of licensing company data to AI developers are that the company keeps ownership, receives one all-in price paid once, and is bound only when it signs. The main drawbacks are an exclusive AI-training term, inventory and approval work, categories lost to rights review, and no assurance that any buyer will select the data.
Read → - GuidesProtecting Your Referral Credit Across Websites
To protect your referral credit when an introduction spans multiple websites, the key is clear, documented communication. Ensure the referred company clearly indicates you as the referrer early in their process.
Read → - ComparisonsPseudonymization vs anonymization under the GDPR: what changes for licensing
Pseudonymised data usually remains personal data under the GDPR because a key or other information can re-link it, while truly anonymous data falls outside the regulation. Recital 26 sets the test: whether anyone could identify the person by means reasonably likely to be used. Counsel decides which side a dataset sits on.
Read → - GuidesPurchase price allocation: when acquired data is recognized as a separate intangible asset
In a purchase price allocation under ASC 805, acquired data is recognized apart from goodwill only if it is identifiable: it arises from contractual or legal rights, or it could be separated and sold, transferred or licensed. Databases and customer lists can qualify; ownership gaps and confidentiality limits can defeat it. Confirm each judgment with your auditors.
Read → - ResourcesQuarterly board meeting agenda template with a data asset update
A quarterly board meeting agenda for a PE-backed company covers consent items, the CEO update, financials against budget and covenants, the value creation scorecard, a rotating deep dive, risk, people and an executive session. This template adds one optional ten-minute data asset item: records held, rights status and where any licensing screen stands.
Read → - ResourcesQuarterly investor letter template for private equity: reporting a portfolio data license
In a private equity quarterly LP letter, report a portfolio company's data license briefly and conservatively: one-time, non-recurring, the company's own decision, no named counterparty, and no projected proceeds. Place it in the portfolio update section and have fund counsel and compliance review the wording first.
Read → - ResourcesQuarterly portfolio review meeting agenda for private equity operating teams
A private equity portfolio review meeting agenda covers performance against budget, value creation initiatives, cash, talent, risks and decisions for each company. This 90-minute template adds a five-minute standing item on records and systems changes, which catches migrations and shutdowns before history is lost and flags companies worth an optional SourceX fit screen.
Read → - GuidesQuarterly Referral Planning for Professional Advisors
A quarterly referral planning process for advisors involves reviewing existing networks against SourceX's company baseline, strategically planning introductions, and tracking the status of open referrals. This systematic approach helps maximize referral opportunities and ensure timely follow-ups.
Read → - GuidesQuasi-identifiers and re-identification risk in workplace data
Quasi-identifiers are ordinary fields, such as job title, office, project name and timestamp, that identify a person when combined. Removing names alone does not de-identify emails or tickets. Companies reduce the risk by generalizing precise values, suppressing rare combinations and testing group sizes before any dataset is licensed.
Read → - ResourcesQuestions AI data buyers ask companies in due diligence
AI data buyers ask where records came from, who may license them, what personal information remains, whether claims can be verified and how data will be extracted. Prepare written answers for each, without sharing any records, using the five-part PROVE checklist before a deal moves to price and terms.
Read → - ResourcesQuestions boards should ask management about AI, data assets and licensing
Boards should ask management where AI creates value and risk, who owns AI decisions, how vendors may use company data, and which proprietary records the company holds. Directors should also ask whether those records have been assessed, what customer and employee promises limit their use, and whether licensing them has been considered or ruled out.
Read → - GuidesQuestions LPs ask GPs about AI in 2026, and how to answer them
LPs ask GPs about AI in four areas: where AI is deployed across the portfolio and what it has changed, how AI risk is governed, how the firm itself uses AI, and whether AI creates new revenue or threatens existing businesses. The best answers are specific, evidence-backed and staged, and describe new revenue such as data licensing without projecting proceeds.
Read → - ResourcesQuestions to ask a business owner about their records
Ask a business owner five questions: where approvals are logged, where exceptions go, who reviews work, how outcomes are recorded and how far back it goes. The answers reveal decision-with-outcome records without opening a file, and map to the 50+ full-time employees at peak, history and rights screens before you introduce SourceX.
Read → - ResourcesQuestions to ask a business owner at a networking event, without pitching
The best questions to ask a business owner at a networking event are open, specific and about the company's story: how long it has run, how big the team got at its busiest, which systems run the work and what changes next. The answers also show, without any pitch, whether a SourceX data licensing introduction might fit.
Read → - ResourcesQuestions to ask a buyer when selling your business
Sellers should ask a buyer about strategy, systems and archives, side initiatives such as a data license, deal terms and people before granting exclusivity. This checklist adds reference calls with former sellers and a table for reading the answers, so owners and advisors can compare buyers on more than price.
Read → - ResourcesQuestions to ask about a company's tech stack in a first conversation
Ask about systems, years of history, who administers each tool, and who can authorize licensing. Ten questions cover these without requesting any files, and the answers map directly to the company fit checker. Strong candidates run many systems, keep several years of records, and have a sponsor who can approve a license.
Read → - GuidesQuickBooks Desktop discontinued: what to do with old company files
When a client's QuickBooks Desktop version is discontinued, confirm the exact version and its dates with Intuit, find every company file, make backups and test a restore, then choose between a supported Desktop product, a migration or a read-only archive. Export a standard report pack to open formats, and review what the history is worth before archiving it.
Read → - GuidesQuickBooks to NetSuite migration: what to do with the history left behind
Many QuickBooks to NetSuite migrations load balances and a limited window of detail, leaving older history in the QuickBooks file. For a company with 50+ full-time employees at peak, the owner should decide what happens to it before the file is retired, including whether a SourceX assessment of its licensing value is worthwhile.
Read → - GuidesR&D credit for AI development projects: what the records show and what to do next
AI development can support an R&D credit claim in some cases, depending on the facts and the tax rules. Credit studies examine experiment logs, evaluations and engineering decisions, and the same evidence shows how deep a client's records are, which an adviser can raise with SourceX separately and with permission.
Read → - GuidesR&D credit for architecture and engineering firms: funded research and who owns the work
For architecture and engineering firms, an R&D credit study turns on who funds the work and who holds substantial rights in it. The same contract review shows which records the firm owns and which belong to clients, so an adviser learns early whether a permissioned licensing introduction to SourceX could make sense.
Read → - GuidesR&D tax credit documentation: what to keep, and how it doubles as a records inventory
R&D tax credit documentation should tie every claimed cost to a specific project and to evidence of the technical work: design documents, tickets, code reviews, test results, and wage allocations with a stated method. Check the current Form 6765 instructions for the tax year. The same records also show whether a company holds engineering history AI developers license.
Read → - GuidesR&D tax credit for manufacturers: which process records a study uses
A manufacturing R&D credit study draws on engineering change orders, trial run logs, nonconformance and CAPA records and BOM revision history. For advisers, the same records show how deep a client's operational history runs, which is the first screen in a SourceX licensing introduction raised separately and with permission.
Read → - ResourcesR&D tax credit interview questions for engineering teams, with a records-depth block
Credit study interviews follow four steps: hypothesis, uncertainty, experiments and outcome. This question bank covers each step and adds a five-minute depth block that records how many years and systems of engineering decisions a client kept, the signal behind a permissioned SourceX licensing introduction.
Read → - ComparisonsR&D tax credit referral programs vs data licensing introductions for CPA firms
An R&D tax credit referral program pays a CPA for sending clients to a credit-study provider, on terms each provider sets; a SourceX introduction pays {{rate}} of the fees SourceX collects, capped at {{cap}} per referred company, only after a buyer pays. Contingent-fee and attest-client rules shape what a firm may accept from either.
Read → - GuidesRCM company acquisitions: separating BAA-bound data from firm-owned records
For an RCM acquisition, PE teams should set aside provider-client PHI and screen for firm-owned operating records such as payer-rule libraries, appeal playbooks and QA methods. Preserve those exports before platform consolidation, and introduce companies that pass the screen to SourceX.
Read → - ResourcesReceiver inventory of assets checklist: records, systems and SaaS access included
A receiver's inventory of assets should list operating records, system archives and SaaS accounts alongside cash, receivables, equipment and IP. For each system, record who holds admin access, the renewal date, what the vendor deletes after termination, who created the records and what court approval a sale or license would need.
Read → - ComparisonsReceiver, ABC assignee or Chapter 7 trustee: who has authority to license company data?
Authority to license an insolvent company's records follows control of its assets. A receiver acts within the court's appointment order, an ABC assignee holds the assets under the assignment and state law, and a Chapter 7 trustee acts under the Bankruptcy Code, needing notice and a hearing for deals outside the ordinary course. Former owners generally cannot sign alone.
Read → - ResourcesReceivership order language for electronic records and system access
A receivership order that covers business records should give the receiver possession of electronically stored information wherever hosted, control of domains and admin accounts, prompt credential turnover, a preservation directive to service providers, and authority to license records after court approval. The clause outline below is general information for counsel to adapt to the appointing court.
Read → - ComparisonsReceivership vs bankruptcy: who controls assets and who approves a data license?
Receivership puts a court-appointed receiver in charge of assets under a specific order, while bankruptcy is a federal process covering all creditors, run by a trustee or debtor in possession. For a data license, identify who signs and who approves, then involve that person before introducing a distressed company.
Read → - ComparisonsReciprocal referrals vs paid referral fees: which model fits a CPA firm?
Reciprocal referrals trade introductions between firms with no cash changing hands; a referral fee pays the introducer. For CPAs, the AICPA Code requires permitted referral fees to be disclosed and bars commissions for attest clients, and state boards can be stricter. SourceX sends no work back, so its only model is a disclosed reward paid from its own fee.
Read → - GuidesRecommending a vendor to a client: an ethics checklist for business lawyers
When a lawyer recommends a vendor such as SourceX and takes no fee, the main ethics questions move from fee rules to confidentiality, conflicts and documentation: get the client's consent before sharing its identity, confirm you hold no personal interest, record the recommendation in a file memo and suggest independent review of the terms. State rules vary.
Read → - ResourcesRecords custody log template for a trustee, receiver or assignee
A records custody log is a dated record of who held each business system, when it was exported, how the copy was verified and who has had access since. For a trustee or receiver it protects the fiduciary, and it gives AI labs and data buyers the provenance evidence they ask for during a SourceX license.
Read → - ResourcesRecords disposal checklist: what to review before deleting old company records
Before deleting old records, review four gates: legal retention, open holds, contract duties and licensing value. Document each answer, archive read-only when unsure, and bring in counsel for holds. This checklist helps CFOs and IT providers run that review and keep a licensing option open through SourceX.
Read → - ResourcesRecords retention schedule template with a licensing-value column
A records retention schedule lists each record set, its owner, keep period and deletion trigger. This template adds a licensing-value column that flags record sets worth a short review before scheduled deletion, so fractional CFOs and COO advisors can spot depth without handling any record contents.
Read → - ResourcesRed flags that make a data licensing introduction a bad idea
The main data licensing red flags are records that belong to someone else, mostly consumer personal data or PHI with no licensing basis, deleted archives, a court or trustee in control and not yet involved, data already licensed for AI training, records generated with AI to sell them, and nobody able to export. Any one usually stops an introduction.
Read → - GuidesReducing cloud storage costs: what to check before deleting old data
To reduce cloud storage costs without regret, tier or archive old data before deleting it, and run a one-page value check first. Cleanup programs hit the oldest data first, which is often the long operational history AI buyers value. Fractional CFOs can approve deletions only after an owner confirms what is being removed.
Read → - ResourcesReduction in force IT checklist: preserve mailboxes and files before deprovisioning
A reduction in force IT checklist should add a preserve step before accounts, licenses and mailboxes are removed. Confirm holds with counsel, keep restorable copies of departing teams' mailboxes, drives and tickets, then screen the records for rights and licensing value. SourceX can assess qualifying companies after an MSP introduces them.
Read → - GuidesReferral agreement audit and reporting rights: what a partner can reasonably expect
A referral partner's audit and reporting rights come from the signed agreement and program terms, not from a general law. Expect status by stage and a payout statement showing how each reward was calculated, and negotiate any inspection right before signing. For SourceX partners, rewards are calculated on eligible fees SourceX actually collects.
Read → - ResourcesReferral agreement confidentiality clauses: what a referral partner may and may not share
A referral agreement confidentiality clause limits what each party may disclose and how it may use what it learns, but your own duties to clients often restrict you more. As a SourceX partner, share only basic fit facts with the company's permission: name, sponsor, headcount band, years operating and industry. Never share records, exports or confidences.
Read → - GuidesReferral agreement tail provisions: are you still paid after the agreement ends?
A referral agreement tail provision keeps your right to be paid for introductions made during the agreement when the deal closes or the money arrives after it ends. For SourceX introductions, that depends on the signed partner agreement and published terms, so confirm the attribution window, survival wording and payment condition in writing instead of assuming an M&A-style tail.
Read → - ResourcesReferral Checklist: Quality Inspection Records Data
This checklist guides manufacturing consultants in referring companies with quality inspection records for data licensing. It covers essential criteria like company baseline, data rights, and identifying an authorized sponsor to ensure successful introductions.
Read → - GuidesReferral fee clawbacks: when a paid reward can be reversed
A referral fee clawback is a contract term that lets the payer recover a fee already paid when the underlying revenue is later refunded or reversed. Search your agreement for refund, offset and overpayment language. For SourceX, the published terms and your signed partner agreement control, not this guide.
Read → - ResourcesReferral fee disclosure letter template: tell clients how you are paid, in writing
A referral fee disclosure letter tells a client, in writing and before they decide, that you may be paid for an introduction. For a SourceX referral, it states that you may receive {{rate}} of SourceX's collected fees, capped at {{cap}} per company, paid by SourceX, never deducted from the client's proceeds, and not guaranteed.
Read → - GuidesReferral fee disclosure rules for CROs, trustees, assignees and receivers
Restructuring professionals should assume any referral reward tied to an estate or distressed client must be disclosed, may need court approval and, in some fiduciary roles, should be declined. The answer depends on your role, the retention or appointment order, bankruptcy rules on connections and compensation, and any ethics code that binds you as a lawyer, CPA or turnaround professional.
Read → - ComparisonsReferral fee for an introduction only vs co-selling: what changes?
Partner programs that pay by involvement usually pay more when the partner joins calls or leads the close, and less for a bare introduction. SourceX uses the simplest model: partners introduce and give basic fit information only, never sell, and earn {{rate}} of collected fees, capped at {{cap}} per referred company, after the buyer pays.
Read →