Who can say yes to licensing submittal revision review records? A decision tree for construction document consultants

Short answer

Start with the head of design coordination, or the project engineering manager, who knows which projects have clean revision chains and where the gaps are. The decision to discuss licensing belongs to the CEO, with general counsel or the contracts manager reviewing what owner and design agreements allow. Platform admin rights are access, not authority. What can actually be licensed stays unknown until SourceX's rights review.

Visual briefFull-size diagram
A left-to-right approval tree starting at the design coordination head, forking on whether a record was created by the contractor, the design team or the owner, sending design-team and owner records through counsel, and lighting the path to the CEO as signer before SourceX rights review.
A typical path at a mid-sized contractor. Authority varies by company; what can be licensed stays open until SourceX's rights review.

This answer is part of the submittal revision review guide. It is laid out as a tree because submittal files mix records written by three parties, and the path to a yes depends on whose record it is.

Walk the tree: four forks

Each fork is a question you can settle in conversation, without opening a project.

  1. Who keeps the revision history day to day? Usually the design coordination head or project engineering manager. They are the sponsor.
    • If coordination is decentralized to project teams, ask who sets submittal procedures company-wide.
  2. Who created each record? The contractor creates submittal items, product data packages and its own shop drawings. The design team creates drawings, details, markups and review comments. The owner, especially a public one, may have approved some items directly.
    • Contractor-created only: go to fork 4.
    • Design-team or owner material involved: fork 3 first.
  3. What do the design and owner agreements say? The contracts manager knows where they are; counsel reads them. Copyright law treats a building design embodied in plans or drawings as an architectural work, and the Copyright Office notes that registering a technical drawing covers only the drawing. That is why architect details, such as an adapter curb drawn to resolve a submittal conflict, may not be the contractor's to license. The page on who owns construction drawings sets out the usual position.
  4. Who can authorize a licensing discussion? The CEO, who in a family-owned contractor is often the owner. Operations directors confirm the project history but do not decide.

When fork 4 ends with an officer willing to take a call, the partner's work is done. Everything after it is SourceX's rights review with the company.

Whose record is it? Contractor, design team, owner

RecordCreated byUsual controlReview before any proposal
Submittal items, revision numbers, status historyContractorContractor's CEOCounsel checks owner confidentiality terms
Product data packages and supplier lettersContractor, from suppliersContractor, subject to supplier termsCounsel, light review
Contractor shop drawingsContractor or its subcontractorsContractor or subcontractor, by contractCounsel checks subcontract terms
Review comments and stampsDesign teamDepends on the design and owner agreementsCounsel; possibly design firm consent
Drawings, details and markupsDesign teamOften the design firmCounsel; often excluded
Government approvals on public projectsGovernment reviewerGoverned by the prime contractCounsel; may be excluded

The last two rows deserve care. Drawing repositories keep revision history by sheet; in Procore, for example, a sheet uploaded with an existing number becomes a new revision, and markups added to an old revision after a newer upload do not carry forward. Those revisions and markups are often the design firm's work, even when they sit in the contractor's account. On federal work that follows UFGS 01 33 00, submittals classified for Government approval went to the government reviewer rather than the contractor's quality control, so those decisions carry the owner's terms.

Who to meet, who to consult, who signs

RoleWhat they bringCan say yes?Question for them
Design coordination headCoverage, gaps, which projects are cleanNo; sponsors"Which closed projects have full revision chains?"
Project engineersDetail on specific projectsNoFacts only, through the sponsor
Contracts managerWhere owner, design and subcontract terms sitNo; flags limits"Do design agreements address reuse of drawings?"
General counselReading of those termsAdvises; may need to clear"Would owner or design terms restrict this?"
CEOWhether to explore licensing at allYes"Would you take a first call about it?"
Platform or IT administratorRetention and export routesNo"How long are archived projects kept?"

Keep notes on the sponsor and the signer separately. A capable coordination head who likes the idea is not an authorized contact.

Questions only counsel and SourceX can close

  • Design firm rights. How much of the review record the contractor can include depends on the design and owner agreements.
  • Owner confidentiality. Healthcare, government and secure-facility projects often carry stricter terms.
  • Subcontractor shop drawings. Ownership follows each subcontract.
  • Retention policy. How long the company keeps project records is its own decision; the page on how long to keep engineering project records covers common practice. A partner should not suggest keeping anything beyond policy.
  • Buyer interest and offer. Unknown until SourceX reviews the opportunity.

Why data rights matter explains what SourceX checks before anything is proposed.

Introduction checklist

  • Sponsor confirmed: the design coordination head agrees the records exist and will raise the idea.
  • Signer named: the CEO has agreed to a first call, or the sponsor will ask.
  • Mixed authorship noted: you have told the company that design-team and owner records will need counsel.
  • Company fit: the introduced company needs 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded), a documented operating history, rights to license and an authorized contact. Companies in the U.S., Canada and the EU qualify, as do companies in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, India, Singapore, South Africa, Latin America, the UAE and Saudi Arabia when at least 90% of the data is in English.

Partners sign the Channel Partner Agreement before submitting introductions, and the first valid introduction within the 90-day window is credited when the company submits a verified application. Describe the systems with the submittal system map, write the note with the submittal referral brief template, and if you are reviewing several portfolio companies at once, the portfolio handoff checklist keeps them apart.

Next step

Refer a company. Earn up to $100,000. Default reward: 25% of Actual Supplier Payout, capped at $100,000 cumulatively per referred company. Eligibility and payment conditions apply, and a signed Schedule A or addendum can differ. A lead, meeting or signature alone does not trigger payment.

When the tree ends at an officer ready for a first call, register as a partner, confirm the contractor against who qualifies, and read the program terms before making the introduction.

  1. Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
  2. Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
  3. Step 3Company signs and is paidThe company signs, delivers its data and is paid by SourceX under its agreement.
  4. Step 4You get your rewardYour 25% of the actual supplier payout. A reward becomes payable after SourceX has paid the referred company under its signed agreement and the payout conditions in the program terms are met, including finance approval and your tax and payment details.

Common questions

Can the Procore or platform administrator be the authorized contact?

No. An administrator can confirm what the platform holds and how long it is kept, but technical access does not include authority to license company records. Name the CEO as the authorized contact.

Does the architect have to agree before a contractor discusses its submittal history?

Not for a first conversation about what exists. Whether drawings, markups or review comments authored by the design team can be included is a later question, answered by the contractor's counsel reading the design and owner agreements, and by SourceX's rights review.

What about government projects where the owner approved some submittals?

Note them separately. On projects that follow UFGS 01 33 00, submittals classified for Government approval went to the government reviewer, and the prime contract may limit how project records are reused. Counsel reviews those terms.

Sources

  1. copyright.gov/circs/circ41.pdf
  2. wbdg.org/FFC/DOD/UFGS/UFGS 01 33 00.pdf
  3. support.procore.com/products/online/user-guide/project-level/dra…
  4. refer.sourcex.si/terms

Free resources

Know a company with valuable proprietary data?

Become a referral partner, get your link and introduce the company’s CEO (in an owner-run company, usually the owner). Referral partners can join from most countries. We can't work with partners in countries or regions under U.S. sanctions or on U.S. restricted-party lists. The companies you introduce should be based in the U.S., Canada and the EU, or in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, India, Singapore, South Africa, Latin America, the UAE and Saudi Arabia with at least 90% of their data in English.

Refer a company →

I own a business

Explore licensing your company's data directly to SourceX for AI training and evaluation. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.

Start an assessment