Written introduction vs referral link attribution: a dated evidence timeline for when a click and an intro disagree

Short answer

When a written introduction and a link click disagree, the evidence that matters is dated proof of who first validly introduced the company's authorized contact within the 90-day window. The terms credit an introduction, not a click, and credit is recorded when the company submits a verified application. A click shows a page was opened; a dated email to an authorized contact who opted in shows an introduction. Conflicting claims go to duplicate review, which weighs that evidence under the terms.

Visual briefFull-size diagram
Two swimlanes across a 90-day window: the written-introduction lane shows the partner agreement on day 0 and a dated email introduction on day 6; the link lane shows a click on day 19 and an application through the link on day 38; both lanes meet at verification on day 41, followed by duplicate review.
Illustrative evidence timeline. It shows what each record proves; duplicate review decides the outcome under the terms.

This timeline is part of how the SourceX referral link works. Here the subject is the evidence itself: what each record proves, in date order, and how to keep a file that survives review.

What the terms count, and what a click counts

The program terms set the rule: the first valid introduction within the 90-day attribution window gets credit, credited when the company submits a verified application; one partner per company; duplicates are reviewed. The rewards page summarizes the same rule.

A referral link does two useful things. It tags the application form with a partner, and it logs that someone opened a page. Neither is the rule. The link is a tracking tool that usually agrees with the rule, which is why using it in a one-to-one introduction is recommended. Disagreement happens when the two point to different people, for example when an owner was introduced in writing by one partner and later applied through another partner's public post. For the distinction between marketing touches and contractual credit, see separating marketing attribution from contractual referral credit.

A dated evidence timeline for one introduction (Illustrative)

Fictional, invented for this page: one partner, a 240-person regional freight broker, and a second partner whose public post the owner later clicks. Days count from the agreement signature.

DayEventRecord it leavesWhat it proves
0Partner signs the Channel Partner AgreementSigned agreement with dateThe partner was eligible to submit from this day
6Call with the freight broker's CEO, who agrees to be introducedPartner's call noteOpt-in, but only the partner's own account
6Email to the CEO and SourceX, introducing them, with the partner's linkSent email with Date header, recipients and textA written introduction to an authorized contact, and when
7Partner submits the introduction in the portalPortal timestampThat the partner claimed the company on that date
19CEO clicks a second partner's link in a newsletter and leavesClick log on the second linkThat someone opened that page
38Company applies through the second partner's linkApplication tagged to the second linkWhich form the application came through
41SourceX verifies the applicationVerified application recordThe event at which credit is recorded
41 onwardTwo claims for one company identifiedDuplicate reviewA decision under the terms, not before

Read the right-hand column. The application is tagged to the second partner, but the earliest dated, written introduction to an authorized contact came on day 6 from the first. That is the evidence duplicate review will weigh. This page does not predict the outcome, and a signed Schedule A or addendum can set different terms. The attribution window answer explains the 90 days.

Why the email carries weight: under the Internet Message Format standard, every email must carry an origination date, the Date header, which records when the sender marked the message complete and ready to send. Together with the recipients and the text, it fixes who introduced whom and when, without anyone's memory.

Three disagreement patterns and the stronger evidence

PatternEvidence on one sideEvidence on the otherUsually the stronger evidence of a valid introduction
Written intro first, link click laterDated email to the CEO with opt-inLater click and tagged applicationThe dated written introduction
Link click first, written intro laterEarlier click on a public post, no contactLater dated email to the CEO with opt-inThe written introduction, since a click introduces no one
Two written introsEmail to a junior manager on day 3Email to the CEO with opt-in on day 10Weighed in review; authority and opt-in matter as well as date

"Usually" is deliberate. Duplicate review applies the terms to the facts of each case. What the table shows is which records describe an introduction at all, and which only describe a visit. First valid referrer vs last touch compares the two rule types, and how attribution works across the website and partner portal shows where each record is created.

Keeping an evidence file that survives duplicate review

Keep five items per company, and nothing more:

  1. The signed partner agreement, with its date. It must come before any submission.
  2. The sent introduction email, unedited, with headers. Address the authorized contact, record their opt-in in the text ("as we discussed, introducing you"), and include your own link so the tracking and the written record point the same way.
  3. The portal submission, made the same day or the next.
  4. A one-line note of the opt-in conversation: date, who, what they agreed to.
  5. Nothing from the client. No client records, attachments or exports. If SourceX asks for evidence during review, send the introduction itself: date, sender, recipients and text.

The pattern is described step by step in using a referral link in a one-to-one business conversation.

What still has to happen before any reward

Credit attaches one partner to one company. It does not make a reward payable; creating a link does not make an introduction eligible on its own either. The company must qualify: 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded), documented operating history, rights to license and an authorized contact. Companies in the U.S., Canada and the EU qualify, as do companies in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, India, Singapore, South Africa, Latin America, the UAE and Saudi Arabia when at least 90% of the data is in English. A reward becomes payable after SourceX has paid the referred company under its signed agreement and the payout conditions in the program terms are met, including finance approval and your tax and payment details.

Next step

Refer a company. Earn up to $100,000. Default reward: 25% of Actual Supplier Payout, capped at $100,000 cumulatively per referred company. Eligibility and payment conditions apply, and a signed Schedule A or addendum can differ. A lead, meeting or signature alone does not trigger payment.

Sign the partner agreement before you introduce anyone, so the dated written introduction can be submitted the same day: register as a partner, confirm the company against who qualifies and read the attribution section of the program terms.

  1. Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
  2. Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
  3. Step 3Company signs and is paidThe company signs, delivers its data and is paid by SourceX under its agreement.
  4. Step 4You get your rewardYour 25% of the actual supplier payout. A reward becomes payable after SourceX has paid the referred company under its signed agreement and the payout conditions in the program terms are met, including finance approval and your tax and payment details.

Common questions

My link shows a click from the company before the other partner's email. Does that make me first?

Not on its own. A click records that someone opened a page; it does not show that anyone introduced the company's authorized contact. A dated, written introduction with opt-in is the stronger evidence of a valid introduction.

What if I introduced the company by phone and never wrote it down?

Write it down the same day: send a short follow-up email to the contact confirming the introduction, and submit it in the partner portal. An undocumented call is hard to weigh against a dated written record.

Does submitting in the portal start the 90-day window?

The window and the moment of credit are set by the program terms: credit goes to the first valid introduction within the 90-day window and is recorded when the company submits a verified application. Read the attribution section of the terms for the exact wording.

Sources

  1. refer.sourcex.si/terms
  2. refer.sourcex.si/rewards
  3. rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5322.html

Free resources

Know a company with valuable proprietary data?

Become a referral partner, get your link and introduce an owner or authorized decision-maker. Referral partners can join from most countries. We can't work with partners in countries or regions under U.S. sanctions or on U.S. restricted-party lists. The companies you introduce should be based in the U.S., Canada and the EU, or in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, India, Singapore, South Africa, Latin America, the UAE and Saudi Arabia with at least 90% of their data in English.

Refer a company →

I own a business

Explore licensing your company's data directly to SourceX for AI training and evaluation. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.

Start an assessment