What is a metadata-only PSA ticket history inventory template for MSPs?
A PSA ticket history inventory is a metadata-only sheet an MSP fills from its own reports: ticket counts by year, categories, resolution-note coverage and client-ownership flags. It lets a partner judge fit before introducing the MSP to SourceX, without exporting any ticket.
When to use this PSA ticket history inventory
Use this template when an MSP owner or service director is curious whether years of PSA tickets could be licensed, but nobody wants to export a single ticket to find out. Every field below is metadata: counts, years, categories and yes/no flags. The MSP fills it from the PSA's own reports, and the sheet can be shared in an introduction without exposing a client name or ticket text.
The template is vendor-neutral. ConnectWise, Autotask, HaloPSA and similar tools each have their own report builders, so adapt the report names to your tool and check its documentation for how to produce the counts.
The template
Copy the block below into a spreadsheet. One row per year, plus the summary rows at the end.
How should an MSP fill each section?
| Field | Where it comes from | What to avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Tickets per year | A closed-ticket count report grouped by year | Writing client names or ticket numbers |
| Resolution note coverage | A filter on tickets with a non-empty resolution field, shown as a rough share | Pasting any note text |
| Category list | The PSA's issue or sub-issue types | Naming the client behind a category |
| Contract restrictions | The service manager's read of master service agreement terms | Quoting contract text |
| Other systems | The RMM, documentation tool and chat the team uses | Credentials or links |
Round counts rather than exact totals. A range such as "40,000 to 60,000" is enough, and nothing in the sheet should let a reader identify a customer.
What do the results mean?
| Result | Meaning | Next action |
|---|---|---|
| Five or more years, resolution notes on most tickets, no client restrictions | Strong signal | Introduce, with the sponsor involved |
| Many years but notes blank on most tickets | History without substance | Ask whether notes live in the documentation tool instead |
| Client contracts restrict use of ticket data | Rights problem | The MSP needs counsel; do not introduce yet |
| Under 50 full-time employees at peak | Below the baseline | Stop |
| PSA migrated and old tickets dropped | Short usable history | Check for archived exports |
Many MSPs have dozens of tickets for one client problem. What matters is the pattern: a problem report, triage, an escalation and a closing note that explains the fix. Compare with the way engineering firms pair commits with reviews in git history vs a code snapshot, or how dispatch decisions are kept in dispatcher decision records.
What should never go in the sheet?
- Client names, contact names, email addresses, hostnames or IP addresses.
- Ticket text, attachments, screenshots or passwords.
- Any reward figure or promise of payment.
- Estimates of what the data is worth.
Partners make introductions and give basic fit information only. Partners never export, upload or describe confidential records.
Illustrative example
Illustrative: a fictional 90-person MSP fills the sheet and finds nine years of history, resolution notes on most tickets in the last six years, three clients with restrictive terms and two older PSAs archived. The service director flags the restricted clients as out of scope and the owner agrees to an introduction. The partner never saw a ticket; the sheet held only counts and flags.
Follow-up timing
- Send the filled sheet only after the sponsor agrees to an introduction.
- If no reply in a week, send one short follow-up to the sponsor.
- After that, leave the lead; the MSP can also apply directly from the referral link.
How rewards work
Rewards are 25% of the eligible platform fees SourceX actually collects, capped at $100,000 cumulative per referred company, and become payable only after the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee; no reward is guaranteed. Because the reward is a share of SourceX's fee, it is never deducted from what the company receives.
Related reading
The service-business screening style used here is explained in the MSP referral guide. Companies also holding safety paperwork can read about near-miss and incident reports. Acquirers of finance-side businesses can compare screening approaches in equipment finance company acquisitions, and the specialty contractor roll-up guide describes how sponsors run a screen across a portfolio.
Next step
Once the sheet is complete, check the MSP with who qualifies or the data inventory builder, then register as a partner to make the introduction.
- Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
- Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
- Step 3Buyer selects and paysThe buyer selects and pays for the data and SourceX receives its fee.
- Step 4You get your rewardYour share of SourceX fees becomes payable.
Common questions
Does the MSP need to export tickets to fill this in?
No. Every field is a count, year, category or yes/no flag that PSA reports can produce without exporting ticket text. The sheet is designed so no client or ticket content leaves the MSP.
Which PSA tools does this work with?
Any PSA that can report closed tickets by year and category, including common tools such as ConnectWise, Autotask and HaloPSA. Report names differ, so use your vendor's documentation to build the counts.
What if clients' contracts restrict use of ticket data?
Then the MSP does not have clear rights for those tickets. It should review its agreements with counsel before any introduction. Tickets from clients that consented, or that belong to the MSP, are the realistic starting point.
How many years of history are enough?
SourceX looks for several years of documented operations, and five to ten years or more helps. Older archived systems also count, so list them in Section D.
Who should see the filled sheet?
Only the MSP's authorized sponsor and, once the sponsor agrees, the introduction to SourceX. Keep it confidential, store it no longer than you need and do not forward it to other contacts or lists.
Is a high ticket count enough?
No. Volume without resolution notes or category structure has limited value. Notes that explain how a problem was fixed, linked to categories and changes, matter more than raw counts.
Related pages
- Does git history matter? Why commit history is worth more than a code snapshot
- What data does AI dispatching need, and where do dispatcher decision records live?
- Referral opportunities for managed service providers
- Near-miss reports and safety incident records: what a company can license
- Equipment finance company acquisitions: which credit and servicing records can be licensed?
- How to screen specialty contractor roll-up add-ons for data licensing
Free resources
- AI readiness assessment — Ten questions, five dimensions, a score out of 100.
- EBITDA calculator — Reported and adjusted EBITDA from net income.
- MOIC calculator — Multiple on invested capital from realized and unrealized value.
- All free tools · MCP resource center
By SourceX Partnerships Team · Published 2026-10-09 · Updated 2026-10-09
Know a US company with valuable proprietary data?
Become a referral partner from anywhere we support, get your link and introduce an owner or authorized decision-maker.
Refer a company →I own a business
Explore licensing your company's data to AI developers worldwide. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.
Start an assessment