Who can say yes to licensing subcontractor evidence reconciliation records? A decision tree for compliance consultants

Short answer

Start with the supplier compliance director, who knows where evidence packages, reviewer notes and decisions live and how complete they are. The person who can authorize a licensing discussion is the CEO. General counsel must weigh in on anything the subcontractor authored or anything touching government customer information. Portal administrator rights are access, not authority, and what can actually be licensed stays open until SourceX's rights review.

Visual briefFull-size diagram
A top-down approval tree that starts at the supplier compliance director, splits on who authored the record (prime, subcontractor or government customer), routes subcontractor and customer branches through counsel, and lights the path to the CEO as authorized signer, ending at SourceX rights review.
A typical path at a mid-sized prime contractor. The CEO signs; the rights result stays open until SourceX reviews it.

This answer belongs to the subcontractor evidence reconciliation guide. It is laid out as a decision tree because the answer changes with one question the other pages do not ask: who wrote the record?

Five questions that lead to a yes

Work down the list in a normal conversation with the client. None of the questions requires seeing a document.

  1. Who runs evidence review day to day? Usually the supplier compliance director, sometimes a subcontract compliance manager inside procurement. This is your sponsor.
    • No single owner? Ask who signs deficiency letters. That person knows where the history sits.
  2. Who wrote each record class? The prime writes flowdown lists, reviewer notes, deficiency letters and approvals. The subcontractor writes evidence packages and attestations. The government customer's information may appear inside both.
    • Prime-authored only: continue to question 4.
    • Subcontractor-authored or customer information involved: go to question 3 first.
  3. What do the agreements say? The subcontracts manager can point to confidentiality and ownership terms for submitted documents; counsel decides what they mean. Where the subcontractor handled Federal contract information, which is when FAR 52.204-21's safeguarding clause flows down, the material it submitted about those systems deserves particular care.
  4. Who can authorize a discussion about licensing company data? The CEO. Some companies need board or owner consent for a new revenue line; see whether licensing data requires board approval.
  5. Has the CEO agreed to a first call? If yes, the tree ends at an authorized introduction. Everything after that is SourceX's rights review with the company.

Records by author: prime, subcontractor, government

The second question matters more here than in most workflows, because a reconciliation file mixes three authors.

Record classWritten byWho usually controls itWho must review before any proposal
Flowdown lists and modificationsPrime (subcontracts team)Prime's CEOCounsel checks prime contract terms
Reviewer comments and deficiency lettersPrime (compliance team)Prime's CEOCounsel, light review
Approvals and closeoutsPrime (compliance and quality)Prime's CEOCounsel, light review
Evidence packages and attestationsSubcontractorShared; depends on subcontract confidentiality and ownership termsCounsel; possibly subcontractor consent
Material containing government customer informationGovernment or prepared for itGoverned by the prime contract and any CUI rulesCounsel; may be excluded

The last row is the hardest. NARA describes controlled unclassified information as information the government creates or possesses, or that others create or possess for it, where a law, regulation or government-wide policy requires or permits safeguarding or dissemination controls. Whether any of that sits in a reconciliation file is a legal question, and the government contractor CUI guide explains why such material is often left out entirely.

Role card: sponsor, advisers and signer

RolePart they playCan authorize?One question to ask them
Supplier compliance directorSponsor; knows coverage and gapsRarely alone"How many years of reviews can you still follow?"
Subcontracts managerAdviser on subcontract termsNo"Do subcontracts address who owns submitted documents?"
General counsel or contracts counselAdviser with a veto in practiceAdvises; often must clear"Would customer or subcontract terms limit reuse?"
CEOSignerYes"Would you take a first call about licensing?"
Portal or IT administratorSource of technical factsNo"How long is closed-supplier history kept?"

Keep the sponsor and the signer apart in your notes. Introductions fail most often when an enthusiastic sponsor is mistaken for a decision-maker. The general guide to finding the right decision-maker covers the same distinction for other companies.

Branches that stay open until rights review

Some parts of the tree cannot be closed by the partner or by the company in a first meeting. Saying so plainly makes the introduction more credible.

  • Subcontractor consent. Whether the subcontractor must agree before its packages can be included is a reading of the subcontract, not a guess.
  • Controlled information. Which records contain CUI or Federal contract information is assessed record class by record class.
  • Retention versus reuse. FAR 4.703 generally requires contractors to keep records available for 3 years after final payment. That is an audit obligation and grants no permission to reuse anything.
  • Buyer interest and offer. Whether there is demand for reconciliation histories, and on what terms, is unknown until SourceX reviews the opportunity.

Why data rights matter explains what SourceX checks and why it checks before anything is proposed.

Ready to introduce?

Three checks before you submit:

  • Sponsor confirmed. The supplier compliance director agrees the records exist and will raise the idea internally.
  • Signer named. The CEO has agreed to a first call, or the sponsor has committed to ask.
  • Company fit. The introduced company needs 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded), a documented operating history, rights to license and an authorized contact. Companies in the U.S., Canada and the EU qualify, as do companies in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, India, Singapore, South Africa, Latin America, the UAE and Saudi Arabia when at least 90% of the data is in English.

Partners sign the Channel Partner Agreement before submitting, and the first valid introduction within the 90-day window is credited when the company submits a verified application. If you work as a consultant through another firm, read the subcontractor agreement guide before raising the subject. Describe the records using the system map and send the note with the referral brief template.

Next step

Refer a company. Earn up to $100,000. Default reward: 25% of Actual Supplier Payout, capped at $100,000 cumulatively per referred company. Eligibility and payment conditions apply, and a signed Schedule A or addendum can differ. A lead, meeting or signature alone does not trigger payment.

Once the tree ends at a CEO willing to take a call, register as a partner, confirm the contractor against who qualifies, and read the program terms before you make the introduction.

  1. Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
  2. Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
  3. Step 3Company signs and is paidThe company signs, delivers its data and is paid by SourceX under its agreement.
  4. Step 4You get your rewardYour 25% of the actual supplier payout. A reward becomes payable after SourceX has paid the referred company under its signed agreement and the payout conditions in the program terms are met, including finance approval and your tax and payment details.

Common questions

Can the subcontractor's own compliance lead authorize anything about the prime's records?

No. The subcontractor can speak only for its own company and, possibly, for documents it authored, subject to the subcontract. The prime's review notes and decisions belong to the prime, and only the prime's CEO can open a discussion about them.

Does the contracting officer need to approve a licensing discussion?

Not for a first metadata-level conversation in most cases. Whether a government customer's consent is needed for particular records depends on the prime contract and on any controlled information, which counsel and SourceX's rights review assess later.

Is the portal administrator a good person to introduce?

As a source of facts about retention and fields, yes. As the authorized contact, no: administrator access is technical, and it does not carry authority to license company records.

Sources

  1. archives.gov/cui/about
  2. acquisition.gov/far/52.204-21
  3. acquisition.gov/far/4.703
  4. refer.sourcex.si/terms

Free resources

Know a company with valuable proprietary data?

Become a referral partner, get your link and introduce the company’s CEO (in an owner-run company, usually the owner). Referral partners can join from most countries. We can't work with partners in countries or regions under U.S. sanctions or on U.S. restricted-party lists. The companies you introduce should be based in the U.S., Canada and the EU, or in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, India, Singapore, South Africa, Latin America, the UAE and Saudi Arabia with at least 90% of their data in English.

Refer a company →

I own a business

Explore licensing your company's data directly to SourceX for AI training and evaluation. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.

Start an assessment