Who can say yes to licensing alert and incident records? A decision tree for partners

Short answer

Introduce the CEO, who can authorize a data discussion, and name the operations center director as the person who knows the records; the CTO or VP of engineering often sponsors it internally. The director can say what exists and how good the notes are, but administrator access to a monitoring platform is not authority to license what it holds. Customer contracts and employee names in notes can add counsel and privacy sign-off.

Visual briefFull-size diagram
An approval tree that starts at the operations center director, branches on whether alerts cover customer environments and whether notes name employees, and lights a path through the CTO, general counsel and privacy lead to the CEO, who can authorize, ending at SourceX rights review.
Illustrative routing. The CEO authorizes; each company's contracts decide which reviews come first.

This decision tree is part of the alert deduplication decisions guide. It works through the questions in order, so a partner can tell after one conversation whom to introduce and which questions to leave for SourceX's review.

Who knows the records and who can say yes

Two different people answer two different questions. Getting them confused is the most common reason an introduction stalls.

  • The person who knows. The operations center director (sometimes titled NOC manager or head of site reliability) knows which alert groups, merge notes and incidents exist, how far back, in which tools, and when the old platform goes dark. Alertmanager and similar tools deduplicate, group and route alerts; the director decided how they were configured, and that makes them the best guide to the records.
  • The person who can say yes. The alerts describe the company's production systems, so the records are usually the company's own, and a decision to discuss licensing belongs to the CEO, who can bind it. The CTO or VP of engineering usually sponsors the discussion internally.

The partner's job is to identify both, introduce the second and mention the first.

The decision tree, question by question

Work down the list. Each answer either sends you to the next question or adds a sign-off.

QuestionIf yesIf no or not sure
1. Does the company itself run the monitored systems?The company's own executive is the owner; go to 2It monitors for customers; go to 3
2. Is there a CTO or VP of engineering over production data?Ask them to sponsor; introduce the CEO with the director named; go to 4Introduce the CEO with the director named; go to 4
3. Do customer contracts say who controls alert data about customer environments?General counsel reads them before any discussion; go to 4Treat as unknown; counsel and SourceX review decide; go to 4
4. Do analyst notes or chat threads name employees?HR or privacy input may apply; go to 5Go to 5
5. Did the records come with an acquisition?Counsel confirms what the acquisition transferred; go to 6Go to 6
6. Is there one authorized contact willing to take the introduction?Make the introductionDo not submit yet; ask who that contact would be

Two branches catch most real cases. A product company that monitors only its own platform usually ends at question 2 or 4. A managed service provider, hosting company or security operations provider that monitors customers almost always passes through question 3.

Roles and what each can authorize

RoleWhat they knowCan they authorize a licensing discussion?
Operations center directorRecord classes, coverage, note quality, tool deadlinesRarely; the natural guide and sponsor
Platform or SRE leadRule history, version control, integrationsNo
CTO or VP of engineeringProduction systems and the data they generateNo, but often sponsors the discussion
General counselCustomer contracts, acquisition documentsAdvises; must review customer-related records
Privacy or HR leadEmployee data in notes and chatAdvises; may set conditions
CEOCommercial priorities and the company's signatureYes, within what contracts permit

Titles below the CEO vary, so ask who knows the records and who would sponsor the discussion, then introduce the CEO.

Customer environments. When the company monitors customers, an alert about a customer's server is operational data about that customer. Whether the company may license it depends on the contract. Counsel reads it; the partner does not interpret it.

Personal data in notes. Incident log entries record who acknowledged, reassigned and merged incidents, and PagerDuty's REST API returns those entries for an incident along with separately listed notes. The European Commission describes personal data as any information relating to an identified or identifiable living individual, including a name or an IP address. Alert payloads can carry IP addresses; notes carry names. That makes privacy review a normal step, not a red flag.

Acquired stacks. Roll-ups often inherit several monitoring platforms. The MSP acquisition due diligence checklist and the cybersecurity services roll-up guide cover where those records end up. Managed service providers and data licensing explains why customer contracts sit at the center for service companies.

Why data rights matter explains, in general terms, why a buyer's interest depends on a clean answer to these questions.

What stays unknown until SourceX's rights review

The tree tells a partner whom to introduce. It does not decide whether anything can be licensed. These answers stay open until SourceX reviews the opportunity with the company:

  • whether the company holds the rights to license each record class
  • what customer contracts permit for alerts about customer environments
  • what would need removing or de-identifying (hostnames, IP addresses, employee names)
  • whether there is buyer interest and on what terms

For SourceX, an introduced company needs 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded), a documented operating history, rights to license and an authorized contact. Companies in the U.S., Canada and the EU qualify, as do companies in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, India, Singapore, South Africa, Latin America, the UAE and Saudi Arabia when at least 70% of the data is in English. Partners keep discovery at metadata level, never ask for alerts, notes or logins, and sign the Channel Partner Agreement before submitting introductions. The worked alert storm shows the kind of records under discussion, and the referral brief template has a field for the authorized contact.

Next step

Refer a company. No cap on rewards. Default reward on a company's first qualifying transaction: the greater of $50,000 plus 5% and 15% of Actual Supplier Payout, with no cap; further qualifying transactions first agreed within 12 months of the first Closing pay 15%. Eligibility and payment conditions apply, including the USD 100,000 Minimum Transaction, and a signed Schedule A or addendum can differ. A lead, meeting or signature alone does not trigger payment.

Once the CEO, who can say yes to a discussion about the operations center's records, is willing to take the call, register as a partner, check the company against who qualifies and read the program terms before introducing the CEO.

  1. Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
  2. Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
  3. Step 3Company signs and is paidThe company signs, delivers its data and is paid by SourceX under its agreement.
  4. Step 4You get your rewardthe greater of $50,000 plus 5% and 15% of the actual supplier payout, with no cap. A reward becomes payable after SourceX has paid the referred company under its signed agreement and the payout conditions in the program terms are met, including finance approval and your tax and payment details.

Common questions

Can the operations center director sign off on their own?

No. They administer the tools and understand the records, but administrator access is not authority to license what the tools hold. Introduce the CEO, who can authorize the discussion, and name the director as the person who can explain the records.

What if the company was acquired and the old monitoring data came with it?

Then the acquisition documents matter. Whether the buyer holds rights to the acquired company's operational records, and under which customer contracts, is a question for its counsel and SourceX's rights review.

Sources

  1. refer.sourcex.si/terms
  2. commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/data-protectio…
  3. developer.pagerduty.com/api-reference/b3A6Mjc0ODE0Nw-list-log-entrie…
  4. prometheus.io/docs/alerting/latest/alertmanager

Free resources

Know a company with valuable proprietary data?

Become a referral partner, get your link and introduce the company’s CEO (in an owner-run company, usually the owner). Referral partners can join from most countries. We can't work with partners in countries or regions under U.S. sanctions or on U.S. restricted-party lists. The companies you introduce should be based in the U.S., Canada and the EU, or in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, India, Singapore, South Africa, Latin America, the UAE and Saudi Arabia with at least 70% of their data in English.

Refer a company →

I own a business

Explore licensing your company's data directly to SourceX for AI training and evaluation. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.

Start an assessment