Bankruptcy Rule 2014: should referral relationships be disclosed?

Yes, assume a referral relationship tied to estate records should be put to counsel for disclosure. Rule 2014 asks professionals seeking retention to disclose connections, and disinterestedness turns on them. Disclose the reward, decline it, or do not introduce; the estate can still benefit from a licensing introduction.

Does a referral relationship need to be disclosed under Bankruptcy Rule 2014?

If you are being retained as a professional by an estate, assume yes: Rule 2014 asks for the professional's connections, and a financial interest in a data licensing platform that may deal with estate records is a connection worth putting in front of counsel before you sign anything. The safest practice is to disclose it, or decline the reward and say so.

This is general information, not legal, tax or financial advice. Confirm with your own counsel, tax adviser or professional body before acting. Read the current text of Rule 2014, Bankruptcy Code section 327 and section 101(14) in the official sources, because this page does not reproduce them.

What Rule 2014 is for

Rule 2014 is the procedural rule that governs applications to employ professionals in a case. It asks the applicant to disclose connections with the debtor, creditors, other parties in interest and their lawyers and accountants, and with the United States trustee. Whether a professional is eligible turns on disinterestedness and on holding no interest adverse to the estate, concepts found in the Code sections cited above.

The purpose is simple. The court and creditors should know about any tie that could affect the professional's judgment before they approve the retention, not discover it later.

Why a licensing reward belongs in the analysis

A referral reward from a data licensing platform creates a financial interest that depends on what happens to estate records. That does not make it adverse by definition. It does mean three things are worth testing.

  1. Is the interest connected to estate property? Customer, email and operating records can be estate assets.
  2. Could it influence advice? If you advise on asset sales, the reward gives you a reason to favor a license.
  3. Would a creditor be surprised? A reasonable test is whether a party in interest would want to know.

Data sales in bankruptcy already attract scrutiny. Under section 363, if a debtor's privacy policy limits transfer of personally identifiable information and was in effect when the case began, a sale needs further steps, and section 332 provides for a disinterested consumer privacy ombudsman. A professional with an undisclosed stake would be advising in exactly the area where independence is watched most closely.

Table: when a connection comes up

MomentConnection to considerAction to confirm with counsel
Before filing the retention applicationAny reward or arrangement with SourceXDisclose in the verified statement, or decline the reward
After retention, a new opportunity appearsReward arises mid-caseSupplement the disclosure promptly
Records contain consumer personal dataSection 363 and 332 steps, privacy policyDo not advise on a license until privacy review is done
You are the debtor's CRODual role as advisor and officerSee the CRO conflict page
Trustee or assignee controls recordsThey decide, not the advisorIntroduce to the decision-maker only

The cost of not disclosing

The consequences of a missed disclosure are for the court to decide, and counsel can tell you what courts in your district have done. Ask also whether the duty to update a disclosure continues after retention. The practical lesson is that disclosure costs a paragraph and non-disclosure can cost the engagement.

How an introduction can still help the estate

An unpaid introduction, or one where the reward is waived, can still be useful. Records that would be deleted when systems are retired may be worth something to AI labs and data buyers, and a license needs the company's authorization and an executed agreement before any data is delivered. SourceX works with the entity that has authority. A partner only makes the introduction and gives basic fit information, and never exports, uploads or describes confidential records.

Check fit first with the company fit checker: 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded), several years of documented operations, rights to license the data and an authorized sponsor. Where a trustee, assignee or court controls assets and has not been involved, that is a red flag, not a reason to proceed quietly.

Checklist before you introduce anything

  • Read the retention order and your engagement terms for restrictions on outside compensation
  • Ask counsel whether the reward is a connection to be disclosed or a reason to decline
  • Identify who controls the records: debtor, trustee, assignee or court
  • Check privacy policies and contracts that restrict transfer of the data
  • Obtain written approval from the person with authority
  • Record the decision, the date and the people consulted
  • Revisit disclosure whenever facts change

What to say

How rewards work

Partners earn 25% of the eligible platform fees SourceX actually collects from the referred company's licensing deals, capped at $100,000 per referred company. The reward is paid only after the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee; an introduction, meeting or signed agreement alone does not trigger payment, and no reward is guaranteed. It is a share of SourceX's fee and is never deducted from what the company or estate receives. Read the program terms, and for related disclosure practice see the page on independent sponsors disclosing referral income.

Questions to ask your counsel

  • Is a referral reward a connection that must appear in my verified statement, or only a matter for my engagement terms?
  • If I disclose it, should I also state that I will decline or waive it?
  • Does the local rule or the United States trustee's guidance on retention applications say anything about third-party compensation?
  • If the estate's records include personal data, who must review the privacy policy before a license is discussed?
  • How should I update the disclosure if a license opportunity arises after retention?

Illustrative disclosure approach

Illustrative: a financial advisor is retained by a chapter 11 debtor, a 90-person software services company. During the engagement the advisor learns that the debtor holds eight years of support tickets and project records on systems due to be shut down. The advisor tells counsel, who drafts a supplemental disclosure stating that the advisor has been invited to register as a referral partner with a data licensing platform and will not accept any reward. The advisor then introduces the opportunity to the debtor's board, which decides whether to apply. The advisor takes no part in terms or delivery.

Next step

Take the question to your own counsel before any contact. If the answer is to proceed with disclosure or without a reward, register as a partner; you can see the steps on the how it works page.

  1. Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
  2. Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
  3. Step 3Buyer selects and paysThe buyer selects and pays for the data and SourceX receives its fee.
  4. Step 4You get your rewardYour share of SourceX fees becomes payable.

Common questions

Does Rule 2014 apply to every restructuring professional?

It applies to professionals whose employment by the estate needs court approval, such as attorneys, accountants and financial advisors retained under section 327. Other roles, such as a CRO retained as an officer, may follow different routes but face similar disclosure expectations. Counsel can tell you which regime covers your engagement.

Is a referral reward automatically a disqualifying interest?

Not automatically. Disqualification turns on whether the professional is disinterested and holds no interest adverse to the estate. A reward is still a connection that decision-makers may want to weigh, so the question is disclosure and approval, or declining, rather than hoping nobody asks.

What if the reward is waived?

A waived reward removes the financial interest, which usually simplifies the analysis. You should still check whether the introduction itself creates any connection with SourceX or other parties worth stating. Ask counsel whether to mention the waiver in the disclosure.

Can a trustee or assignee use SourceX directly?

Yes, an authorized representative of the company or estate can apply directly at sourcex.si/apply. SourceX qualifies the opportunity, and any license requires the right authority, agreed terms and an executed agreement. Court approval or notice requirements depend on the case and are for counsel.

Why does consumer personal data change the analysis?

Because the Bankruptcy Code adds steps when a sale of personally identifiable information conflicts with the debtor's privacy policy, including a consumer privacy ombudsman in some cases. Mainly consumer personal data with no licensing basis is also a red flag for the program. Get privacy review before any license discussion.

Free resources

By SourceX Partnerships Team · Published 2026-10-09 · Updated 2026-10-09

Know a US company with valuable proprietary data?

Become a referral partner from anywhere we support, get your link and introduce an owner or authorized decision-maker.

Refer a company →

I own a business

Explore licensing your company's data to AI developers worldwide. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.

Start an assessment