Article 9 sales of IP and data collateral: running a defensible disposition
An Article 9 sale of intellectual property lets a secured lender dispose of IP and data collateral after default without going to court, provided every aspect is commercially reasonable and the required notices are sent. Article 9 also treats a license as a disposition, so operational records can be licensed alongside the IP sale to add to the recovery.
How an Article 9 disposition of intangibles works
After a default, Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code lets a secured party sell, lease, license or otherwise dispose of its collateral without a court process. The price of that freedom is scrutiny afterward: every aspect of the disposition, including method, manner, time, place and terms, must be commercially reasonable, and the debtor, guarantors and other secured parties are entitled to notice. Intangibles make both tests harder, because code, trademarks and data have no ready market and their value depends on what a buyer can actually take over.
Article 9 is state law. Each state enacts its own version, and the section numbers below follow the official text, so have counsel confirm them against the governing state's enactment.
| Provision | What it covers | What it means for IP and data |
|---|---|---|
| 9-610 | Disposition after default, including sale, lease or license; every aspect must be commercially reasonable | A license of records is a recognized way to realize value from collateral |
| 9-610 | When the secured party may buy at its own sale | It may buy at a public disposition, but at a private one only for collateral customarily sold on a recognized market or with widely distributed price quotations, which IP and data rarely are |
| 9-611 to 9-614 | Who must be notified, when and with what content | Debtor, secondary obligors and certain other secured parties need reasonable, authenticated notice |
| 9-615 | Application of proceeds, surplus and deficiency | A weak process can shrink or defeat a deficiency claim |
| 9-617 | What a buyer receives | A transferee for value takes the debtor's rights and discharges the security interest and subordinate interests, not rights the debtor never had |
| 9-620 | Acceptance of collateral instead of a sale | A consensual alternative when the borrower cooperates |
| 9-627 | Determining commercial reasonableness | A low price alone does not prove unreasonableness, but it invites a closer look at the process |
Prerequisites
- A clear default and acceleration under the loan documents.
- Collateral that covers the assets. The security agreement should reach general intangibles, software, intellectual property, books and records and data, with perfection confirmed. Registered patents, trademarks and copyrights also have federal ownership records, so expect buyers to want recordable assignment documents.
- An ownership map. Separate what the borrower owns from what it only licenses. Copyright ownership can be transferred in whole or in part, and any exclusive right can be transferred and owned separately, under 17 U.S.C. § 201. That cuts both ways: it lets the code and an AI-training license be split between different counterparties, and it means some rights may already have been granted away.
- Access to the data. Data collateral is only worth what someone can export. Without a cooperative borrower or a receiver, the lender may own a security interest in records it cannot reach.
- An experienced sale agent for marketing intangibles, and IP counsel to review the chain of title.
Step by step: running the sale
- Sort the collateral into three buckets: owned IP (code, trademarks, domains, patents), licensed-in rights (third-party software and subscriptions) and operational records (CRM, tickets, documents, communications).
- Secure access and preserve. Pay the subscriptions that hold records, export what is at risk and document who controls each account.
- Choose the structure. A public sale lets the lender bid; a private sale may reach strategic buyers faster. Decide whether the IP is sold in one lot or several, and whether records are licensed on a separate track.
- Build the data room and marketing plan. Give buyers enough technical and legal information to bid with confidence, and market for long enough to reach the likely buyers.
- Send the notifications. Counsel prepares notices to the debtor, guarantors and other secured parties with the content the governing statute requires, and confirms the timing safe harbor in that state's enactment.
- Run the sale and document everything. Keep the marketing list, inquiries, bids and the reasons for accepting the winning bid.
- Close with transferable documents. Bill of sale, IP assignments in recordable form, domain and account transfers, and delivery of code and records.
- Apply the proceeds and account for any surplus or deficiency.
Title is the recurring weak point. When the borrower will not sign assignments, the secured party executes the transfer documents itself, often under a power of attorney in the security agreement, and buyers or IP offices may ask what authority supports them. Courts have considered whether ownership of registered IP passes through a state-law foreclosure, and outcomes turn on the facts and the paperwork. A cooperation agreement signed by the borrower before the sale, and IP counsel's review of the chain of title, head off many disputes.
Where a records license fits
Because Article 9 treats a license as a disposition, operational records do not have to be sold with the code to produce value. Support tickets, CRM history, engineering reviews and internal documents can be licensed to AI developers through SourceX while the IP is sold to a strategic buyer. A separately marketed records license can also help document that the lender looked for value in every part of the collateral.
Licensing for AI training is an active policy topic. The US Copyright Office's report on generative AI training, released as a pre-publication version in May 2025, discusses the practicality of licensing approaches for training data. It is a report, not law, but it explains why buyers now ask about rights before anything else.
| Stage | Who signs the records license | Watch-out |
|---|---|---|
| Before enforcement | The borrower's CEO or CFO, with any lender consent the credit agreement requires | Covenants may bar licensing without consent |
| After default, before the sale | The borrower under a cooperation agreement, or the secured party as part of its disposition | Counsel should confirm the secured party's authority and process |
| Receiver appointed | The receiver, on the order's approval procedure | See lender motions to appoint a receiver |
| After the sale | Whoever bought the records | Price the license before the sale, not after |
| Borrower files for bankruptcy | The debtor in possession or trustee, with court approval | The automatic stay halts the Article 9 sale; see Article 9 sale vs section 363 sale |
Two program facts shape the timing. SourceX licenses are typically exclusive for AI training for an agreed term, so disclose any license in the sale notice and data room so IP buyers bid knowing it exists. And the company keeps ownership: the records are licensed, not sold, with one all-in price paid as a one-time payment, typically within about 60 days of invoicing once the buyer selects the data.
Common mistakes
| Mistake | Risk it creates | How to avoid it |
|---|---|---|
| Planning a private sale and a lender bid | The secured party generally cannot buy IP at its own private sale | Use a public sale if the lender may bid; see credit bidding under section 363(k) for the bankruptcy version |
| Selling licensed-in software as if owned | The buyer gets only what the borrower had, and may get nothing | Map owned versus licensed rights first |
| Short marketing to save cost | A low price after a thin process invites a commercial-reasonableness challenge | Market long enough to reach likely buyers and document it |
| Letting subscriptions lapse during the sale | The records collateral disappears | Fund preservation and exports from the start |
| Bundling records with code by default | Records value is buried in the code price | Market a records license on its own track |
| Assignments the buyer cannot record | Title questions delay or kill the closing | Prepare recordable documents and a borrower cooperation agreement |
Illustrative example
Illustrative: a fictional field-service scheduling software company, which had 95 full-time employees at its peak, misses payments on its term loan and is declared in default. The borrower signs a cooperation agreement, and the lender runs a public sale of the code, trademarks and domains through an experienced sale agent. In parallel, the borrower introduces its nine years of support tickets, implementation project records and engineering reviews to SourceX, with the lender's consent. The data room discloses the proposed exclusive AI-training license, so bidders for the code price it in. The lender documents each track separately in its file.
How the introduction works
The lender or its advisor makes the introduction; the borrower, receiver or other authorized party works with SourceX directly. SourceX will want to see that the borrower reached 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded), operated long enough to build several years of records, can show it holds the rights to license them and has an authorized person to sign. The company fit checker gives a preliminary, non-binding read, and the business introducer's guide to operational data licensing explains the process end to end. Venture lenders working through a startup default should also read the venture debt shutdown guide.
Partners earn 25% of the eligible platform fees SourceX actually collects from the referred company's licensing deals, capped at $100,000 per referred company. Payment follows the money: the reward is due only after the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee, no reward is guaranteed, and the company's own proceeds are never reduced by it.
This is general information, not legal, tax or financial advice. Confirm the governing state's version of Article 9 and the chain of title with your own counsel before acting.
Next step
Before the notice goes out, split the collateral into owned IP, licensed-in rights and operational records. If the records look substantial, register as a partner and introduce them while the borrower is still cooperative.
- Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
- Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
- Step 3Buyer selects and paysThe buyer selects and pays for the data and SourceX receives its fee.
- Step 4You get your rewardYour share of SourceX fees becomes payable.
Common questions
Can a secured lender buy the IP at its own Article 9 sale?
At a public disposition, yes. At a private disposition, only if the collateral is customarily sold on a recognized market or is subject to widely distributed standard price quotations, which intellectual property and data almost never are. Lenders that expect to bid, including by credit bidding their debt, therefore generally plan a properly noticed public sale.
Is licensing collateral a valid Article 9 disposition?
Yes. Article 9 lists licensing alongside selling and leasing as ways a secured party may dispose of collateral after default, subject to the same commercial reasonableness and notice requirements. A license can realize value from records without transferring ownership, but its terms, exclusivity and approvals should be reviewed by counsel before the lender relies on it.
What makes an IP disposition commercially unreasonable?
Common problems are thin marketing, a rushed timetable, missing or late notices, an unclear description of what is being sold and terms that discourage serious bidders. A low price alone does not prove unreasonableness, but it prompts a court to look closely at the process, so a documented marketing effort is the lender's best protection.
Do we need the borrower's cooperation to sell data collateral?
In practice, usually. Records live in systems the borrower administers, and without credentials or exports the buyer receives little. A cooperation agreement covering access, exports and signing assignments is the cleanest route. Where the borrower will not cooperate, lenders often ask a court to appoint a receiver who can take control of the systems.
What happens to an Article 9 sale if the borrower files for bankruptcy?
The automatic stay generally halts the sale, and any disposition then runs through the bankruptcy court, typically as a section 363 sale on notice with court approval. The lender may still be able to credit bid there, subject to the court's power to limit it for cause. Work already done on marketing and title remains useful.
Related pages
- Lender motions to appoint a receiver: keeping the borrower's records as collateral
- Article 9 sale vs section 363 sale: which works better for intangible collateral?
- Credit bidding under section 363(k): buying IP and data collateral with debt
- Check Company Fit for Data Licensing
- A Business Introducer's Guide to Operational Data Licensing
- Venture debt lenders in startup shutdowns: recovering value from records beyond the code
Free resources
- Working capital calculator — Net working capital, current ratio and quick ratio.
- Due diligence checklist generator — A tailored document request list by deal type.
- Cash flow calculator — A 12-month cash forecast with shortfalls highlighted.
- All free tools · MCP resource center
By SourceX Partnerships Team · Published 2026-10-09 · Updated 2026-10-09
Know a US company with valuable proprietary data?
Become a referral partner from anywhere we support, get your link and introduce an owner or authorized decision-maker.
Refer a company →I own a business
Explore licensing your company's data to AI developers worldwide. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.
Start an assessment