Reciprocal referrals vs paid referral fees: which model fits a CPA firm?
Reciprocal referrals trade introductions between firms with no cash changing hands; a referral fee pays the introducer. For CPAs, the AICPA Code requires permitted referral fees to be disclosed and bars commissions for attest clients, and state boards can be stricter. SourceX sends no work back, so its only model is a disclosed reward paid from its own fee.
The short verdict
Reciprocal referrals trade introductions between firms with no cash changing hands; a referral fee pays the person who made the introduction. For CPA firms, both need care. The AICPA Code requires permitted referral fees and commissions to be disclosed to the client and bars commissions where the firm performs attest work for that client, and state boards can go further. Reciprocal arrangements with law firms also carry conditions on the lawyer's side.
For SourceX introductions the choice is narrower. SourceX does not refer work back to partners, so a referral swap is not on offer. The options are a disclosed reward paid by SourceX from its own fee, never deducted from the client's proceeds, or an introduction with no reward at all.
How each model works
- Reciprocal referral: two firms agree, formally or informally, to send each other suitable clients. The value flows as future work, not cash.
- Paid referral fee: the business receiving the client pays the introducer, either a fixed amount or a share of the fee it earns from that client.
- No-fee introduction: the introducer passes on a contact and takes nothing, which is often the fallback when rules or firm policy bar a fee.
Side by side
| Factor | Reciprocal referrals | Paid referral fees |
|---|---|---|
| What the introducer receives | Future referrals, not cash | A payment |
| Who pays | Nobody directly | The business receiving the client |
| AICPA position | Ask your state board how an exchange of referrals is viewed | Permitted fees must be disclosed; commissions barred for attest clients |
| The law firm's side | State versions of Rule 7.2 permit non-exclusive reciprocal agreements where the client is informed | Lawyers face tight limits on paying for recommendations |
| Disclosure to the client | Good practice, and expected on the lawyer's side | Required for permitted fees |
| Objectivity risk | Pressure to send work to the partner firm whether or not it fits | Pressure to recommend the business that pays |
| Documentation | Often informal; better in writing | Written agreement plus client disclosure |
| Available with SourceX | No; SourceX does not refer work back | Yes, as a disclosed reward from SourceX's fee |
What the rules actually say
The AICPA Code. The Commissions and Referral Fees Rule (ET 1.520) bars a member in public practice from accepting a commission for recommending a product or service to a client when the member or the firm also performs an audit, a review, certain compilations or an examination of prospective financial information for that client. Commissions and referral fees that are permitted must be disclosed to the client. The rule text appears in the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct; the AICPA's online Code is the authoritative current version.
State boards. Each state adopts its own rules, and some are stricter than the AICPA. The New Jersey Society of CPAs' resource on commissions and contingent fees shows how a state's requirements can differ from the Code. Your own state board's rule is the one that controls.
Lawyers you trade referrals with. Rule 7.2 generally stops a lawyer from giving anything of value for a recommendation, with listed exceptions. New Hampshire's version, for example, allows non-exclusive reciprocal referral agreements where the client is informed. An Illinois State Bar Association opinion adds that a lawyer may join reciprocal referrals with nonlawyer professionals in a networking group only if the arrangement is non-exclusive, the client is informed and the lawyer's independent judgment is unaffected, and that the lawyer needs client consent before passing on a client's name (ISBA Advisory Opinion 12-03).
This is general information, not legal, tax or financial advice. Confirm with your state board of accountancy, your firm's ethics counsel or your professional body before acting.
How the rules apply in common CPA-firm situations
| Situation | What to check | Outcome to confirm with counsel or your board |
|---|---|---|
| Your firm audits or reviews the client | Whether a reward for this introduction counts as a commission under ET 1.520 for an attest client | Treat it as a stop until you have an answer; the client can still apply directly |
| You provide only tax, CAS or advisory work | Whether your state classes the reward as a commission or a referral fee, and the disclosure it requires | Written disclosure before the introduction |
| You trade referrals with a law firm | The lawyer's state version of Rule 7.2 | A non-exclusive arrangement, with clients informed |
| You belong to a networking or peer group | Whether the group expects members to swap referrals | Keep any arrangement non-exclusive and disclosed |
| Firm policy bars outside compensation | Your firm's independence and fee policies | Make a no-fee introduction instead |
Why SourceX uses a disclosed reward rather than a referral swap
SourceX manages data licensing between companies and AI labs and data buyers. It does not provide accounting, tax, legal or advisory services, so it has no client work of that kind to send back. The program pays a reward instead.
Partners earn 25% of the eligible platform fees SourceX actually collects from the referred company's licensing deals, capped at $100,000 per referred company, and the reward becomes payable only after the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee. The reward is a share of SourceX's fee and is never deducted from what the company receives, which keeps the disclosure to your client simple. Rewards are not guaranteed: nothing is paid unless a license closes and the buyer pays.
If your rules or firm policy rule out any fee, you can still help. Point the client to apply directly at sourcex.si/apply without your referral code. No partner reward arises in that case, and the client's terms are the same either way. For how this reward differs from deal-based success fees, see Lehman formula vs referral fee.
Disclosure good practice
- Tell the client in writing, before the introduction, that you are a registered SourceX partner.
- Explain what the reward is: a share of SourceX's collected fee, capped per referred company, payable only if a deal closes and the buyer pays.
- State that the reward does not reduce the client's price or proceeds.
- Make clear the client may decline, or apply without your referral code.
- Say whether you are advising on the license itself, and if not, say so plainly.
- Keep the disclosure and the client's acknowledgement in the engagement file.
Questions to ask your state board or ethics counsel
- Is a reward for introducing a client to a data licensing service a commission or a referral fee under our state's rules?
- Does the answer change if the firm performs any attest service for that client, including compilations?
- What form and timing of disclosure does our state require?
- Does our independence policy treat a reward paid by a third party differently from a fee paid by the client?
- Under our firm's policies, should any reward be paid to the firm or to an individual partner?
To build introductions into the firm's routine once the answers are in, the quarterly referral planning process for professional advisors sets out a calendar.
Next step
Check client fit with the company fit checker against the baseline on who qualifies. Once your rules are confirmed, register as a partner. The accountants' partner page covers which clients tend to fit.
Common questions
Is a reciprocal referral arrangement exempt from disclosure?
Not safely. On the lawyer's side, state versions of Rule 7.2 that allow reciprocal referral agreements generally require them to be non-exclusive and the client to be informed. For CPAs, ask your state board how an exchange of referrals is treated. Telling clients about any standing referral relationship is good practice even where no rule requires it, because it protects your objectivity.
Can a CPA accept the SourceX reward for an audit client?
The AICPA Code bars accepting a commission for recommending a product or service to a client when the firm performs an audit, review, certain compilations or an examination of prospective financial information for that client. Whether a data licensing introduction reward is classed that way is a question for your state board or ethics counsel. Until it is answered, the client can apply directly with no referral code.
Does the referral reward reduce what my client receives?
No. The reward is a share of the fee SourceX collects, and it is never deducted from what the company receives. The company agrees one all-in price with SourceX's fee included and no separate charges, so the presence of a partner does not change the client's side of the deal. Say this explicitly in your written disclosure.
What should a written disclosure to the client include?
State that you are a registered SourceX partner and may receive 25% of the eligible platform fees SourceX collects from the client's licensing deals, capped at $100,000 per referred company, paid by SourceX only after the buyer pays and never deducted from the client's proceeds. Add that the client may decline or apply without your code, and whether you are advising on the license.
Why does SourceX not offer referrals back to partner firms?
SourceX manages data licensing between companies and AI labs and data buyers. It does not provide accounting, tax, legal or advisory services, so it has no client work of that kind to pass back. The program compensates partners through the disclosed reward instead, which is simpler to document in an engagement file and simpler to explain to a client.
Related pages
- Lehman formula vs referral fee: how an M&A success fee compares with a SourceX reward
- Quarterly Referral Planning for Professional Advisors
- Check Company Fit for Data Licensing
- Which US businesses are a fit for a SourceX data licensing introduction
- Referral opportunities for accountants and bookkeeping firms
Free resources
- Client opportunity brief generator — An editable intro email, summary and checklist.
- Days sales outstanding calculator — How many days customers take to pay.
- Business succession planning assessment — Ten questions on successor, transition and documentation.
- All free tools · MCP resource center
By SourceX Partnerships Team · Published 2026-10-09 · Updated 2026-10-09
Know a US company with valuable proprietary data?
Become a referral partner from anywhere we support, get your link and introduce an owner or authorized decision-maker.
Refer a company →I own a business
Explore licensing your company's data to AI developers worldwide. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.
Start an assessment