Recommending a vendor to a client: an ethics checklist for business lawyers
When a lawyer recommends a vendor such as SourceX and takes no fee, the main ethics questions move from fee rules to confidentiality, conflicts and documentation: get the client's consent before sharing its identity, confirm you hold no personal interest, record the recommendation in a file memo and suggest independent review of the terms. State rules vary.
The short answer: no fee keeps it simpler, but three duties remain
When a lawyer tells a client about a vendor and takes nothing for it, the fee-division and payment-for-referral rules largely drop out of the picture. What remains is the ordinary professional framework: protect the client's confidential information, make sure no personal interest colors the advice, record what you recommended and why, and suggest independent review when the client is relying on your judgment. How each piece applies depends on the version of the rules your state has adopted.
For a SourceX recommendation the practical sequence is short. Get the client's consent before you share its name with anyone, confirm that you hold no financial interest in the outcome, and write a file memo the same day.
What the rules actually say
The ABA Model Rules are a template that each state adopts in its own form. The ABA's index of the Model Rules is the starting point; your state's version controls.
- Confidentiality of the client's identity. In Illinois State Bar Association Advisory Opinion 12-03, on a lawyer's participation in a networking group with nonlawyer professionals, the committee treated a client's identity as confidential, so client consent is needed before sharing a client's name. It also said a reciprocal referral arrangement must be non-exclusive, the client must be informed, and the arrangement must not interfere with independent judgment. The opinion is advisory and specific to Illinois, but its confidentiality point maps directly onto vendor introductions.
- Conflicts from a lawyer's own interest. The general conflict rule for current clients, Model Rule 1.7, treats a significant risk that a representation will be materially limited by a personal interest of the lawyer as a conflict. A recommendation with no fee and no tie to the vendor is less likely to raise that question; a recommendation from which you would gain anything is more likely to.
- Business transactions with a client. If you were to take a financial interest connected to the client's matter, Model Rule 1.8(a) permits a business transaction with a client only if the terms are fair and reasonable and disclosed in writing, the client is advised in writing to seek independent counsel, and the client gives informed consent in a signed writing. The ABA's Ethics 2000 Commission explanation describes Rule 1.8 as setting conditions under which such transactions may go forward rather than banning them outright. Whether a referral reward triggers 1.8(a) is a question for your state's rule and your ethics counsel.
- Payments for recommendations and reciprocal referrals. Rule 7.2 governs giving value to people who recommend a lawyer's services, and states differ on its exceptions; the ABA's chart of state advertising and solicitation rule differences shows the variation. It matters here only if a vendor offers to send clients back to you.
- Independent judgment. Model Rule 2.1 asks a lawyer to exercise independent professional judgment and render candid advice, which is the reason to keep any recommendation separate from any benefit to you.
How the rules apply in common situations
| Situation | What to check | Typical outcome to confirm |
|---|---|---|
| You mention data licensing during a general business check-in, with no fee | Whether the client will rely on what you said as advice | A file note and a suggestion that the client evaluate the vendor independently |
| You want to introduce the client to SourceX directly | Client consent before disclosing its identity or any matter details | Recorded consent, then a minimal introduction |
| The SourceX program would pay you a referral reward | Your state's conflict, business-transaction and fee rules | Ethics counsel's view in writing before you register; declining is the simplest route |
| You will also negotiate the license for the client | The scope of the engagement and any relationship with the vendor | An engagement letter covering the license work and no undisclosed ties |
| The vendor offers to refer clients to you | Your state's Rule 7.2 exceptions for reciprocal referrals | Only non-exclusive, disclosed arrangements, and only if your state allows them |
| You also sit on the client's board | Director duties as well as lawyer duties | The board's conflict process; see the page for independent directors |
| The client asks you to send the vendor its records | Confidentiality, privilege and the client's authorization | You send nothing; the company deals with SourceX directly, and data moves only under a signed agreement |
For the fee question in depth, see whether a lawyer can accept a referral fee from a non-lawyer business. For the confidentiality question, see what a lawyer can share when introducing a client.
A documentation checklist for the file
A short memo protects the client and you. Record:
- The date, the client contact and what prompted the recommendation.
- What you said about the vendor, including that you have not reviewed its terms for this client.
- A statement that you receive no fee, commission or other benefit, or a description of any benefit and the client's written consent.
- The client's consent before you shared its name or any matter information.
- Your suggestion that the client review the license terms independently, and whether it asked your firm to do that work.
- Which public materials you gave the client, such as the who qualifies criteria.
- The client's decision and the date.
When to suggest independent review
Suggest separate advice, or a formal engagement for your firm, when any of these apply:
- The client is relying on you to judge whether licensing is a good idea, rather than simply hearing that the option exists.
- You or your firm has any relationship with the vendor.
- The license would cover employee communications, customer records, call recordings or regulated data, where privacy and consent questions need specialist review.
- The license would be exclusive for AI training for an agreed term, and the client has other commercial plans for the same records.
- A sale, financing or restructuring is under way and a license could affect disclosure schedules or the deal timeline.
Talking points for the client conversation
Facts worth giving the client, all drawn from how the program works:
- The company keeps ownership; the data is licensed, not sold.
- Nothing binds the company until it agrees price and terms and signs.
- De-identification and redaction requirements are agreed with the company before any work begins, and data is delivered only after an executed agreement and the company's authorization.
- There is one all-in price with SourceX's fee included and no separate charges.
- The eligibility baseline is a US company with 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded), several years of documented operations, rights to the records and an authorized sponsor such as the owner, CEO or CFO.
Questions to put to your ethics counsel or state bar hotline
- Does my state's confidentiality rule treat the client's identity as confidential in a vendor introduction?
- Would any benefit from the vendor, including a referral reward, be a personal-interest conflict under our Rule 1.7 or a business transaction under our Rule 1.8(a)?
- If I advise on the license itself, what disclosures does the engagement letter need?
- Does our state allow reciprocal referral arrangements with nonlawyers, and on what conditions?
- Do my firm's policies on outside activities or vendor relationships add requirements?
This is general information, not legal, tax or financial advice. Confirm with your own counsel, tax adviser or professional body before acting.
Next step
If the client wants to proceed, it can apply directly at sourcex.si/apply. If your ethics review clears participation and you want to introduce companies yourself, register as a partner. The overview for business attorneys explains how other lawyers approach the program.
- Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
- Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
- Step 3Buyer selects and paysThe buyer selects and pays for the data and SourceX receives its fee.
- Step 4You get your rewardYour share of SourceX fees becomes payable.
Common questions
Does a lawyer need client consent just to mention a vendor to the client?
Telling your own client that a vendor exists discloses nothing about the client, so consent is not usually the issue at that stage. Consent becomes important when you share the client's identity or any matter details with the vendor. Illinois advisory opinion 12-03 treats client identity as confidential in referral settings; check how your state handles it before making any introduction.
Is it a conflict if a former colleague now works at the vendor?
A personal relationship can raise a personal-interest question even with no money involved, particularly if the client relies on your view of the vendor. Disclose the relationship to the client, suggest independent review of the terms and note both in the file. If the relationship is close or financial, ask your ethics counsel whether the conflict rules require informed consent.
Can a lawyer accept a referral reward instead of declining it?
That depends on your state's rules on conflicts, business transactions with clients and fee arrangements, and on the facts. This guide assumes the lawyer takes no fee, which keeps the analysis simpler. If you are considering participating as a paid partner, get your ethics counsel's view in writing first and make sure any client disclosure and consent meet your state's requirements.
Should the vendor recommendation go in an engagement letter?
If your firm will advise on the license, the engagement letter should cover that scope, your fees for the work and any relationship with the vendor. If you only mentioned that the option exists, a file memo recording what you said, the absence of any benefit to you and your suggestion of independent review is usually the practical record to keep.
What should a lawyer never send to a data licensing vendor?
Client records, privileged communications, financial statements, employee information or any data sample. The company deals with SourceX directly and decides what to disclose. De-identification and redaction requirements are agreed with the company before any work begins, and data is delivered only after an executed agreement and the company's authorization, so there is no reason for counsel to transmit anything.
Related pages
- How independent directors can make data licensing introductions without conflicts
- Can a lawyer accept a referral fee from a non-lawyer business?
- Rule 1.6 confidentiality: what a lawyer can share when introducing a client
- Which US businesses are a fit for a SourceX data licensing introduction
- How business attorneys can introduce clients to data licensing, ethics first
Free resources
- Business succession planning assessment — Ten questions on successor, transition and documentation.
- NPV calculator — Net present value with a discounted cash flow table.
- Time value of money calculator — Future and present value with optional regular payments.
- All free tools · MCP resource center
By SourceX Partnerships Team · Published 2026-10-09 · Updated 2026-10-09
Know a US company with valuable proprietary data?
Become a referral partner from anywhere we support, get your link and introduce an owner or authorized decision-maker.
Refer a company →I own a business
Explore licensing your company's data to AI developers worldwide. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.
Start an assessment