IP and data asset audit checklist for bankruptcy trustees and receivers
An intellectual property audit in bankruptcy should cover five asset groups: registered IP, software and code, domains and digital accounts, contracts that grant or limit rights, and operational records by system. For each item, record date ranges, who created it, who holds rights and whether it contains personal data, so value can be assessed without exporting confidential content.
What an IP and data audit gives a trustee or receiver
An intellectual property audit in bankruptcy turns a loose description, such as software, a website and some customer lists, into an asset register a fiduciary can value, sell, license or abandon with confidence. The item most often missed is the operating record: years of support tickets, CRM history, engineering reviews and internal email that AI developers license to train and evaluate agents, provided rights are clean and the data can still be exported.
This checklist is written for chapter 7 trustees, chapter 11 professionals and receivers. It captures what exists, who created it, who holds rights and where personal data sits, using counts and date ranges rather than content, so the results can be shared for qualification without exposing confidential material.
The audit checklist
Registered intellectual property
- Patents and published applications: numbers, owner of record, maintenance status and recorded assignments
- Trademarks: registrations, renewal deadlines and whether the marks are still in use
- Copyright registrations, remembering that most company copyrights exist without any registration
- Chain of title from founders, predecessor entities and acquired businesses
Software, code and technical assets
- Code repositories: hosting account owner, number of repositories, years of commit history, and pull request and review history
- Third-party and open-source components, with their license terms
- Code and content written by contractors, with the assignment agreements covering it
- Source code escrow arrangements and their release conditions
Work made for hire matters here. Material an employee prepares within the scope of employment belongs to the employer, but commissioned work counts as made for hire only in listed categories and only with a signed written agreement, according to the US Copyright Office's Circular 30. Contractor output therefore usually needs a written assignment before the estate can license it.
Domains and digital accounts
- Domain names, registrar, renewal dates and the email address that controls each account
- Cloud, app store and social media accounts, with their billing owners
Contracts that grant or limit rights
- Inbound software licenses and whether they can be assigned
- Outbound licenses, especially any exclusivity already granted
- Customer agreements: confidentiality, data ownership and deletion-on-termination clauses
- Any earlier data licensing or data sharing deal, including any AI-training license
Operational records by system
- Each system's name, record types, earliest and latest dates and approximate volume, expressed as counts
- Who created the records: employees, contractors, clients or the public
- Personal-data flags: customer contact data, employee data, payment data, health information
- Export status: admin access held, export tested, or nobody able to export
- The privacy policy versions in force when the case began
Inventory template
Use one row per asset or system. The rows below are Illustrative and describe a fictional debtor.
| Asset or system | Category | Date range | Created by | Rights note | Personal data flag | Export status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Support ticket system | Operational records | 2016-2025 | Employees and customers | Customer terms limit use; check | Customer names and emails | Admin access held, export not yet run |
| Code hosting organization | Software | 2014-2025 | Employees and two contractors | One contractor agreement lacks an assignment | Minimal | Export tested |
| CRM | Operational records | 2017-2025 | Employees | Debtor-created | Business contact data | Access held |
| Primary domain | Digital account | Registered 2013 | Not applicable | Debtor is registrant | None | Not applicable |
| Product trademark | Registered IP | Renewal due next year | Not applicable | Owner of record is a predecessor entity | None | Not applicable |
At the qualification stage, share categories, counts and date ranges only; never send record contents, samples or screenshots. The data inventory builder helps list systems and records in one place.
How to read the audit results
| Result | What it means | Next action |
|---|---|---|
| Long employee-created history, limited personal data, export possible | A licensing candidate | Run a fit screen and make an introduction |
| Customer personal data under a privacy policy that bars transfer | Section 363(b)(1) limits apply | Narrow the scope, de-identify, or seek court approval |
| Contractor-created content without a written assignment | A gap in title | Exclude it or seek a confirmatory assignment |
| Records largely owned by the debtor's clients | Not the estate's to license | Exclude unless the clients consent |
| Health records or claims data | HIPAA questions | De-identify under an HHS method or exclude |
| System shut down with no export | History may be lost | Check backups and former staff exports before writing it off |
How privacy rules shape data assets in a bankruptcy estate
Customer data can be sold in bankruptcy, but the debtor's privacy promises constrain it. Under 11 U.S.C. 363(b)(1), if the debtor's privacy policy prohibited transferring personally identifiable information to unaffiliated persons and was in effect when the case began, the trustee may not sell or lease that information unless the sale is consistent with the policy, or the court approves it after appointing a consumer privacy ombudsman, giving notice and holding a hearing, and finds no showing that the sale would violate applicable nonbankruptcy law. When that hearing is required, 11 U.S.C. 332 has the court order the US trustee to appoint a disinterested ombudsman no later than seven days before it.
Scrutiny can be strict. In 23andMe's 2025 bankruptcy, the consumer privacy ombudsman recommended that any transfer of customers' genetic or personally identifiable data be prohibited without renewed opt-in consent, The Record reported. That case concerned consumer genetic data rather than business operating records, but the audit lesson carries over: locate every privacy promise early.
For health information, HHS recognizes two ways to meet the HIPAA de-identification standard, Expert Determination and Safe Harbor, the latter removing 18 specified identifiers (HHS de-identification guidance). Receiverships run under state law and court orders rather than section 363, yet the debtor's privacy promises still matter there. The guide to business records versus personal data in a bankruptcy sale goes further.
This is general information, not legal, tax or financial advice. Confirm with your own counsel, tax adviser or professional body before acting.
Red flags that end the data line of the audit
- The records mainly belong to the debtor's clients, as at many agencies and outsourcers, and those clients have not agreed.
- The main data asset is consumer personal information with no licensing basis.
- An AI-training license already covers the same records.
- Archives were deleted, or nobody can run an export.
- Headcount never reached 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded).
- Records were generated with AI to sell them.
From audit to introduction
- Finish the inventory with counts, date ranges, rights notes and personal-data flags.
- Run the company fit checker for a preliminary, non-binding read.
- Make the introduction, or apply for the estate; SourceX then reviews size, history, data breadth, rights and the fiduciary's authority to sign.
- Agree price and terms, and obtain any court approval the case requires before signature.
- Data is delivered only after an executed agreement and the estate's authorization, under redaction rules agreed before work starts.
- The estate is paid; any partner reward follows once SourceX receives its fee.
Whether to license or sell outright is a separate decision, compared in licensing data from a bankruptcy estate vs selling it. Trustees can read the role-specific overview of data licensing for chapter 7 trustees.
Partners earn 25% of the eligible platform fees SourceX actually collects from the referred company's licensing deals, capped at $100,000 per referred company, payable only after the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee; no reward is guaranteed. Court-appointed fiduciaries should not assume they may accept any referral reward; raise it with counsel and, where needed, the court before registering.
Next step
Copy the inventory template into the case file and fill one row per system this week. If the results point to a licensing candidate, register as a partner or apply for the estate at sourcex.si/apply. If an interim finance lead is still in place, the interim CFO turnaround checklist covers the same records from the operating side.
- Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
- Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
- Step 3Buyer selects and paysThe buyer selects and pays for the data and SourceX receives its fee.
- Step 4You get your rewardYour share of SourceX fees becomes payable.
Common questions
Should the audit include records that seem to have no resale value?
Yes. Support tickets, CRM notes, project files and engineering reviews rarely appear on a schedule of assets, yet records of real work with outcomes are what AI developers license to train and evaluate agents. Listing them costs little, and leaving them off can mean systems are shut down or abandoned before anyone checks whether they could produce proceeds for the estate.
Who can build the inventory if the debtor's IT staff have left?
Anyone who can reach the admin consoles: a former administrator on a short contract, the estate's forensic or IT consultant, or a remaining finance lead with access. The inventory needs system names, date ranges, counts and export status, not record contents. Document who accessed each system and when, and keep credentials under the fiduciary's control throughout.
Can the inventory be shared with potential licensees before court approval?
Summary facts usually can be shared under confidentiality: categories, counts, date ranges and system names. Record contents, samples and screenshots should not leave the estate at this stage. Any license still needs whatever court approval the case requires before signature, so confirm with counsel what the court expects to see in the motion and the sale or license procedures.
Are former employees' work emails part of what the estate can license?
Email on company systems is usually listed among the company's records, but whether it can be licensed depends on employee notices, internal policies, privacy law and the personal content inside it. Flag the mail system as containing personal data, keep the handbook and monitoring notices on file and agree redaction rules with counsel before any licensing work begins.
What if the debtor already licensed its data for AI training?
Read that agreement first. An existing AI-training license of the same data, especially an exclusive one still in its term, is a red flag for a new license and may itself be an estate asset or obligation. Other datasets the debtor holds, such as a different system or period not covered by the earlier deal, may still qualify on their own.
Does the same checklist work in a receivership?
Largely, yes. The asset groups, inventory template and red flags apply in the same way. Sections 363 and 332 of the Bankruptcy Code apply only in bankruptcy cases, while a receiver's authority comes from the appointment order and state law. The debtor's privacy promises and customer contracts still constrain what can be licensed in either setting.
Related pages
- Build a metadata-only business data inventory
- Business records vs personal data: what a bankruptcy estate can license
- Check Company Fit for Data Licensing
- Should a trustee license estate data or sell it outright?
- Chapter 7 trustee asset recovery from business data: a playbook for panel trustees
- Interim CFO turnaround checklist: records, covenants and data value in the first weeks
Free resources
- Working capital calculator — Net working capital, current ratio and quick ratio.
- Due diligence checklist generator — A tailored document request list by deal type.
- Cash flow calculator — A 12-month cash forecast with shortfalls highlighted.
- All free tools · MCP resource center
By SourceX Partnerships Team · Published 2026-10-09 · Updated 2026-10-09
Know a US company with valuable proprietary data?
Become a referral partner from anywhere we support, get your link and introduce an owner or authorized decision-maker.
Refer a company →I own a business
Explore licensing your company's data to AI developers worldwide. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.
Start an assessment