How to compare purchase agreement markups from final bidders

Short answer

Compare final-round purchase agreement markups on one issues list with a column per bidder and rows for price mechanics, indemnity, IP and data representations, interim covenants and closing conditions. The data rows show which bidder would restrict a seller from licensing operational records before closing.

How to compare purchase agreement markups from final bidders: overview of What should you compare in final-round purchase agreement markups?, Why add a data row to the issues list?, The issues-list checklist, How to read the results, How the licensing path works alongside a sale
Covered on this page: What should you compare in final-round purchase agreement markups? · Why add a data row to the issues list? · The issues-list checklist · How to read the results · How the licensing path works alongside a sale

What should you compare in final-round purchase agreement markups?

Compare markups on a single issues list, not by reading each redline top to bottom. For every bidder, record the same short set of provisions: price mechanics, indemnity and escrow, IP and data representations, interim operating covenants and closing conditions. The last three decide whether a seller can still license operational records before closing.

This page gives an issues-list format for a sell-side advisor or a seller's deal counsel. It assumes second-round bids arrive with a markup of the seller's draft agreement, when the process letter asks for one. Adapt the rows to your own deal.

Why add a data row to the issues list?

Many companies with 50+ full-time employees at peak hold years of email, ticketing, CRM, finance and engineering records. Those records can be licensed to AI labs and data buyers for a one-time payment, and the company keeps ownership. A buyer's markup can quietly restrict that option.

Three clauses do the damage. An interim covenant that bars "any license of intellectual property or data outside the ordinary course" can stop a pre-close license. A broad IP representation can pull licensed-out records into a breach claim. A closing condition requiring "no new third-party encumbrances" can turn a signed license into a closing risk. The seller should see these before choosing a bidder, not after signing.

The issues-list checklist

Build one row per provision and one column per bidder. Use these groups.

Economics and risk allocation

  • Headline price, debt-like items and the working capital peg, as marked up by each bidder
  • Escrow or holdback size, release date and what it secures
  • Indemnity cap, basket and survival period, plus any special indemnities added
  • Whether representation and warranty insurance is assumed, and who pays for it

IP and data provisions

  • Definition of "Company Intellectual Property" and whether it sweeps in data, records and archives
  • Scope of the IP and data representations: knowledge-qualified or flat, and any new privacy or data-rights reps
  • Any rep that the company "has not licensed or disclosed" data or source material to third parties
  • Treatment of customer and third-party data the company holds but does not own
  • Whether the bidder expects records, exports and archives to transfer intact at closing

Interim covenants and closing

  • Restrictions on licensing, disclosing or granting rights in company records between signing and closing
  • Consent rights over new contracts above a threshold, and whether a data license would trip them
  • Closing conditions tied to IP, data or third-party consents
  • Termination rights and the outside date

How to read the results

What the markup showsWhat it means for a pre-close data licenseNext action
Interim covenant silent on data or licensingThe company has room to license in the ordinary courseConfirm with counsel that a license counts as ordinary course
Covenant bars IP licenses without buyer consentA license needs the bidder's written consentAsk for a carve-out or a consent process with a deadline
IP rep covers "all data and records" flatLicensed-out records could create breach exposureNarrow to knowledge, or schedule the license
Closing condition on "no encumbrances"A signed license might be argued to be an encumbranceDefine permitted licenses in the agreement
Bidder wants records delivered intactExports must be preserved and complete at closingAgree an archive and handover plan early

Two bidders at the same price are rarely equal once this table is filled. The one that leaves the seller room to license, or accepts a scheduled license, is worth more than the headline suggests.

How the licensing path works alongside a sale

If the seller wants to explore a license, the sequence is separate from the purchase agreement and does not need the bidders to know about it until the seller chooses.

  1. The advisor or seller registers as a partner and shares the referral link, or submits the company through the referral form.
  2. SourceX qualifies the company on size, history, data breadth and rights.
  3. The company completes a data inventory listing its systems, years of history and what can be exported.
  4. SourceX and the company agree one all-in price and terms before buyers review.
  5. If a deal closes, data is delivered only after an executed agreement and the company's authorization, under redaction rules agreed in advance.

The advisor never handles, exports or describes confidential records. Whether the license should happen before signing, be scheduled in the agreement, or wait until after closing is a decision for the seller, its deal counsel and the chosen buyer.

What to say to a seller before round two

For the wider seller conversation, see the guide for M&A advisors and the notes on where AI data buyers fit in a buyer list. Teams testing bidder claims about their own AI assets can pair this list with the AI washing due diligence guide. Corporate buyers' perspective is covered on the corporate development referral page.

How rewards work for an advisor

Partners earn 25% of the eligible platform fees SourceX actually collects from the referred company's licensing deals, capped at $100,000 per referred company. The reward is paid only after the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee; a lead, meeting or signed agreement alone does not trigger payment, and no reward is guaranteed. It is a share of SourceX's fee and is never deducted from what the company receives. Securities-licensed advisors and lawyers should check their own firm and regulator rules on referral fees and disclosure before registering; read the program terms first.

When not to raise it

  • The company has fewer than 50 full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded).
  • The records mostly belong to the company's clients and no consent exists.
  • A court, trustee or assignee controls the assets and has not been involved.
  • The data is already licensed for AI training.
  • Nobody can export the records.

The company fit checker gives a preliminary, non-binding screen, and who qualifies lists the full baseline.

Next step

Add the data row to your next issues list, then register as a partner to introduce a seller whose records may qualify.

  1. Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
  2. Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
  3. Step 3Buyer selects and paysThe buyer selects and pays for the data and SourceX receives its fee.
  4. Step 4You get your rewardYour share of SourceX fees becomes payable.

Common questions

Should the seller tell bidders about a possible data license?

That is a decision for the seller and its deal counsel. A common approach is to first track how each markup treats licensing and data, then disclose or schedule a license only if the seller chooses to proceed. Nothing is binding on the company until it agrees price and terms and signs.

Does a data license count as ordinary course under an interim covenant?

It depends on the agreement's wording, the company's history and the deal counsel's view. Many covenants define ordinary course narrowly or ban IP licenses without consent. Ask counsel to address licensing explicitly, with a carve-out or a consent process, rather than relying on an interpretation.

How many rows should an issues list have?

Enough to cover every provision that moves value or risk, grouped by economics, risk allocation, IP and data, covenants and closing. Keep the list short enough that the seller reads it. Add a data row only where it changes the comparison.

What if the winning bidder wants all records delivered intact?

Agree an archive and handover plan early so exports are complete and preserved. A company can still pursue a license of historical records before closing if the agreement permits it, or the buyer may consent. Counsel should settle who holds rights to the licensed copy.

Does the advisor handle any company data?

No. Partners make the introduction and share basic fit information only. The company works directly with SourceX on the inventory, rights review, redaction rules and delivery, and data moves only after an executed agreement and the company's authorization.

Free resources

By SourceX Partnerships Team · Published 2026-10-09 · Updated 2026-10-09

Know a US company with valuable proprietary data?

Become a referral partner from anywhere we support, get your link and introduce an owner or authorized decision-maker.

Refer a company →

I own a business

Explore licensing your company's data to AI developers worldwide. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.

Start an assessment