What is an LPAC, and when does it weigh in on portfolio matters?
An LPAC, or limited partner advisory committee, is a small group of a fund's investors named under the limited partnership agreement, which the general partner consults on conflicts of interest, affiliated transactions, valuation questions and certain waivers. It advises, and consents where the LPA requires, but does not manage the fund or approve ordinary portfolio decisions.
What an LPAC is
An LPAC (limited partner advisory committee) is a small committee of a fund's limited partners, set up under the limited partnership agreement (LPA), that the general partner consults on conflicts of interest and other matters the LPA reserves for it. It advises and, where the LPA says so, consents. It does not run the fund or approve ordinary investment decisions.
Seats usually go to larger or early investors, and are often promised in side letters. The LPA sets the committee's size, voting rules, meeting cadence and powers. Many LPAs also state that members act in their own institution's interest and owe no fiduciary duty to other investors, though how far that holds depends on the LPA and its governing law.
What does an LPAC weigh in on?
Most LPAC business falls into a handful of categories. Your LPA, not market custom, decides which need consent and which need only notice.
| Matter | Why it reaches the LPAC | What the GP usually brings |
|---|---|---|
| Conflicts of interest | The GP sits on both sides, for example a cross-fund investment or a sale between two of its funds | A memo describing the conflict, pricing support and counsel's view |
| Affiliated service providers | A GP affiliate is paid by portfolio companies, such as an in-house operations or consulting group | Fees, terms and a comparison with third-party rates |
| Fees received in connection with portfolio companies | Transaction, monitoring, board or other fees may offset management fees under the LPA | A schedule of fees and how the offset was applied |
| Valuation questions | A change in methodology or a contested mark | The valuation policy and the specific deviation |
| Investment limit waivers | A deal exceeds a concentration, geography or industry limit | The proposed exception and its rationale |
| Term extensions and GP-led deals | Extending the fund or moving assets into a continuation vehicle | The process, pricing evidence and options offered to LPs |
Ordinary portfolio decisions, such as hiring a CEO, approving a budget or refinancing a company's debt, stay with the GP and the company's board unless they create one of the conflicts above.
How an LPAC consent request works
Illustrative: a fictional Fund III wants a portfolio company to hire a consulting firm partly owned by one of the GP's operating executives.
- The GP's CFO or chief compliance officer flags the conflict and checks whether the LPA requires consent or only disclosure.
- Fund counsel drafts a short memo covering the parties, the fees, why the terms are fair and what alternatives were considered.
- The memo goes to LPAC members before a meeting, or as a written consent if the LPA allows one.
- Members ask questions and sometimes request changes, such as a fee cap, an end date or third-party benchmarking, then vote.
- The outcome is minuted and reflected in investor reporting.
Build in time. Members often need to check with their own institutions, and the LPA may set notice periods for meetings or written consents.
LPAC vs similar bodies
| Body | Who sits on it | What it decides | Relationship to portfolio companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| LPAC | Representatives of selected LPs | Consents and advice on matters the LPA reserves | Indirect: reviews GP conflicts that involve them |
| GP investment committee | Firm partners | Acquisitions, exits and major portfolio decisions | Direct, through the deal team |
| Portfolio company board | Sponsor designees, management and independents | Strategy, budgets, officers and material contracts | Direct, and owes duties to the company |
| Annual LP meeting | All LPs | Nothing formal; it is for reporting and discussion | Informational: portfolio updates only |
| Full LP vote | All LPs, by the majority the LPA specifies | LPA amendments and other listed matters | None |
Why the LPAC matters before an operating partner earns a referral reward
Compensation that a GP, its staff or its operating partners receive in connection with a portfolio company is exactly what LPA fee and conflict provisions address. A SourceX referral reward on a portfolio company that licenses its operational records could fall within the fee-offset clause, the affiliated-transaction rules, or both, depending on how the LPA defines affiliates and covered fees. Raise it before you register, not after a deal closes.
Two program facts inform the analysis without settling it. Partners earn 25% of the eligible platform fees SourceX actually collects from the referred company's licensing deals, capped at $100,000 per referred company, payable only after the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee; no reward is guaranteed. And the reward is a share of SourceX's fee, never deducted from what the company receives.
Questions to take to the GP's CFO and fund counsel:
- Does the LPA treat a third party's referral or introduction fee as a fee received in connection with a portfolio company?
- Does an operating partner or operating advisor count as an affiliate of the GP under the LPA's definitions?
- Would the reward offset management fees, need LPAC consent, or need only disclosure in reporting?
- Does any side letter give specific LPs extra notice or disclosure rights?
- Does the answer change for a company outside the portfolio that you know personally?
This is general information, not legal, tax or financial advice. Confirm with fund counsel before acting.
Related terms
- Operating partner model: how firms staff and pay for operating teams, and what LPs ask about it, is covered in how LPs evaluate a PE firm's operating partner model.
- NAV loan: fund-level borrowing that some LPAs restrict or route through LP consent; see what a NAV loan is.
- Deleveraging: company-level options that do not touch the fund's borrowing, in how to deleverage a portfolio company.
- Data licensing fit: the baseline a company must meet, including 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded), on who qualifies.
Next step
Clear the LPA questions above with your GP first, then use the network opportunity finder to separate portfolio companies from personal-network contacts. When you are cleared, register as a partner; the page for private equity operating partners explains how sponsors usually approach it.
- Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
- Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
- Step 3Buyer selects and paysThe buyer selects and pays for the data and SourceX receives its fee.
- Step 4You get your rewardYour share of SourceX fees becomes payable.
Common questions
Who usually sits on an LPAC?
Representatives of a subset of the fund's limited partners, often those with the largest commitments or those who invested early, with seats frequently promised in side letters. The GP selects members under the process the LPA sets out. Members are usually senior investment professionals attending on behalf of their institutions, and the committee's size and voting rules come from the LPA rather than any market standard.
Does the LPAC approve portfolio company decisions?
No. Buying, selling, financing and operating portfolio companies are decisions for the GP's investment committee and each company's board. The LPAC becomes involved only when a portfolio matter raises an issue the LPA reserves for it, typically a conflict of interest, an affiliated transaction, a valuation question or a waiver of an investment limit.
Is LPAC consent the same as a vote of all limited partners?
No. LPAC consent comes from a small committee and covers only the matters the LPA assigns to it. Other matters, such as amending the LPA or removing the GP, usually require a vote of the limited partners as a whole, often by a specified majority in interest. Check which route your LPA requires before assuming an LPAC consent is enough.
Do LPAC members owe fiduciary duties to other investors?
Many LPAs state that LPAC members act in the interest of their own institutions and owe no fiduciary duty to the fund or to other limited partners, and they are often indemnified for committee work. How far those provisions hold depends on the LPA and its governing law, so treat the committee as a consent mechanism rather than a guardian of every investor.
Should an operating partner tell the LPAC about a referral reward?
That call belongs to the GP and fund counsel, not the individual. The operating partner's job is to raise any reward connected to a portfolio company with the firm's CFO or chief compliance officer before registering. They decide whether the LPA requires an offset, LPAC consent or disclosure, and whether the same applies to companies outside the portfolio.
Related pages
- How LPs evaluate operating partners, and what to prepare before a raise
- What is a NAV loan, and what does it mean for portfolio companies?
- How to deleverage a portfolio company without selling assets
- Which US businesses are a fit for a SourceX data licensing introduction
- Map your network to potential US data referral opportunities
- Referral opportunities for private equity operating partners
Free resources
- Operational data inventory builder — List systems, record types, years held and owners.
- AI readiness assessment — Ten questions, five dimensions, a score out of 100.
- EBITDA calculator — Reported and adjusted EBITDA from net income.
- All free tools · MCP resource center
By SourceX Partnerships Team · Published 2026-10-09 · Updated 2026-10-09
Know a US company with valuable proprietary data?
Become a referral partner from anywhere we support, get your link and introduce an owner or authorized decision-maker.
Refer a company →I own a business
Explore licensing your company's data to AI developers worldwide. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.
Start an assessment