Equipment dispute system map: where each interchange record lives and the keys that join one move

Short answer

Three keys carry nearly every reconstruction of a disputed equipment move: the equipment number (container or chassis), the load or booking reference, and the time of each handover at the gate. A fourth, the dispute ID, ties the money back to the argument. Each lives in a different system: the asset tracker knows equipment and time, the dispatch mailbox knows the reason, the provider's bill knows the charge, and accounting knows the credit. When one system drops its key, the dispute can no longer be followed from start to finish.

Visual briefFull-size diagram
A hub-and-spoke map with one container move at the center and six systems around it (asset tracker, dispatch mailbox, dispatch platform, provider billing, dispute log, accounting), each linked by the key it shares: equipment number, load reference, gate time or dispute ID.
Illustrative. Which key each system carries varies by company; ask before assuming.

This map is part of the interchange exception resolution guide. The main guide explains which records settle a missing handover; this page shows where each one sits, which identifier joins it to the next, and who owns it.

Six systems behind one disputed move

A company that disputes equipment charges works from its own records against the provider's, usually under the UIIA, the industry's standard handover contract in North America. A single disputed move touches six systems, and only one of them belongs to the provider.

SystemRecord it holdsKey that links itUsual owner
Asset trackerGeofence exits and entries, dwell timeDevice paired to an equipment number; timestampFleet or operations manager
Dispatch mailboxDispatcher decisions, driver "picked up" and "returned" repliesBox number in subject or body; load referenceDispatch supervisor
Dispatch platformThe load, its stops and assigned driverLoad or booking reference; equipment numberOperations director
Provider portal and billingGate records, receipts, per diem invoicesEquipment number; invoice lineEquipment provider, copy with the carrier
Dispute logEach disputed charge, evidence sent, statusDispute ID; invoice and equipment numberBilling analyst
AccountingCredit memos, rebills, paymentsCredit memo number; ideally the dispute IDController

Read the right-hand column before anything else. Five of the six rows are the company's own; the provider row is a copy of someone else's record, created at the gate by the provider's own process. When the company's own rows can be joined to each other, they can test the provider's row instead of simply accepting it.

Three keys, and the one that ties off the money

Each key answers a different question. A reconstruction needs all of them for the same move.

  • Equipment number. Which unit? The tracker may know only the chassis, while email and invoice name only the box riding on it. The dispatch platform usually pairs the two.
  • Load or booking reference. Which job? The tracker never stores it, so tracker events can only be tied to a business purpose through the dispatch record.
  • Handover time. When did custody change? The tracker gives a machine time, the driver's reply gives a human time, the provider's record gives its own gate time. They rarely agree to the minute.
  • Dispute ID. Which argument produced which credit? If accounting does not record it on the credit memo, the outcome floats free of the evidence.

One move, joined end to end (Illustrative)

A different exception from the main guide's missing out-gate: a mistyped equipment number at the return gate. A fictional 260-person drayage carrier with employee drivers returns box A, the gate record captures a number one digit off, and the provider keeps billing per diem on box A. Identifiers and times are invented.

StepSystemWhat the record saysKey carried forward
1Provider billingBox A still out after day 8; per diem keeps accruingEquipment number A, invoice line
2Dispute logDispute D-5102 opened: "returned day 8, gate record wrong"D-5102, number A
3Dispatch platformLoad L-9134 pairs box A with chassis CH-422, return stop day 8L-9134, both equipment numbers
4Dispatch mailboxDay 8, 14:05: driver replies "returned" with box A's numberNumber A, L-9134
5Asset trackerCH-422 enters the ramp geofence at 14:10 on day 8Chassis number, timestamp
6Provider portalAn in-gate at 14:12 on day 8 for a number one digit off from AGate time, near-match number
7AccountingRebill issued from day 8; credit memo cites D-5102D-5102

Step 3 is the hinge again: only the load record ties CH-422 to box A, so only the load record lets the tracker's 14:10 entry count as evidence for this box. Step 6 shows why the company's records matter even when the provider's own data holds the answer: someone had to know which near-match to look for.

Where the joins break

These are the gaps an operations director will recognize, and the ones to ask about:

  • Tracker knows the base unit, email names the box. Fixable only if the dispatch platform kept the pairing for every load.
  • Time zones. One system stores local time, another UTC, and a pickup just after midnight moves to a different day. A per diem count is sensitive to exactly that.
  • Reasons kept only in personal mailboxes. When a dispatcher leaves, the delay decisions can leave too. In Microsoft 365, a departed user's mailbox survives as an inactive mailbox only if a hold or retention policy was applied before the account was deleted. The preservation timeline covers what to inventory before that happens.
  • Credit memos without a dispute ID. The money moved, but nobody can show why.
  • Re-paired tracker devices. After a fleet change, old events may point at the wrong equipment.

Similar joins appear in OS&D freight records and in accounts payable exception handling; the general method for spotting documented resolutions is in how to identify logistics exceptions.

What to ask the operations director

Stay at metadata level. For each system on the map, ask which years it covers, which key it carries, whether that key was used consistently, and who owns it. The workflow map template is a neutral way to write the answers down. Then ask the who-can-say-yes questions before anyone is introduced.

The introduced company needs 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded), documented operating history, rights to license and an authorized contact. Companies in the U.S., Canada and the EU qualify, as do companies in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, India, Singapore, South Africa, Latin America, the UAE and Saudi Arabia when at least 90% of the data is in English. Whether provider-created receipts can be included, what must be removed and whether any buyer wants the records remain unknown until SourceX reviews the opportunity.

Next step

Refer a company. Earn up to $100,000. Default reward: 25% of Actual Supplier Payout, capped at $100,000 cumulatively per referred company. Eligibility and payment conditions apply, and a signed Schedule A or addendum can differ. A lead, meeting or signature alone does not trigger payment.

If a carrier's dispatch records still pair each base unit with the box it carried, so tracker events and credits can be joined, register as a partner, check the company on who qualifies and read the program terms before you make the introduction.

  1. Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
  2. Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
  3. Step 3Company signs and is paidThe company signs, delivers its data and is paid by SourceX under its agreement.
  4. Step 4You get your rewardYour 25% of the actual supplier payout. A reward becomes payable after SourceX has paid the referred company under its signed agreement and the payout conditions in the program terms are met, including finance approval and your tax and payment details.

Common questions

Is the equipment provider's portal one of the company's systems?

It is a system the company uses, but the records in it are created by the provider. Count it on the map, and note that the company may hold copies rather than originals. Who can license what is a question for SourceX's rights review.

What if dispatch runs entirely by phone?

Then the delay decisions may not exist in writing, and the map has a hole where the reason should be. Some companies log calls in the dispatch platform; ask whether a note field was used.

Do I need to know which tracker vendor the company uses?

It helps, as a plain name, because the vendor's contract may govern the data. Do not ask for device lists, logins or exports.

Sources

  1. intermodal.org/uiia/uniform-intermodal-interchange-faciliti…
  2. learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/inactive-mailboxes-in-office-365
  3. refer.sourcex.si/terms

Free resources

Know a company with valuable proprietary data?

Become a referral partner, get your link and introduce the company’s CEO (in an owner-run company, usually the owner). Referral partners can join from most countries. We can't work with partners in countries or regions under U.S. sanctions or on U.S. restricted-party lists. The companies you introduce should be based in the U.S., Canada and the EU, or in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, India, Singapore, South Africa, Latin America, the UAE and Saudi Arabia with at least 90% of their data in English.

Refer a company →

I own a business

Explore licensing your company's data directly to SourceX for AI training and evaluation. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.

Start an assessment