Ajera to Vantagepoint migration: why to keep the full project history

In an Ajera to Vantagepoint migration, archive the full project, time and billing history even if only recent years convert. The archive preserves records that may later support a data licensing review, and a Deltek consultant can introduce a qualifying A/E firm with 50+ full-time employees at peak to SourceX without touching the data.

Why should the full project history survive an Ajera to Vantagepoint move?

When an architecture or engineering firm moves from Ajera to Vantagepoint, the cheapest moment to preserve the full project, time and billing history is before cutover, because that is when the data is still intact and someone is already mapping it. Converting only a few years saves effort now but can permanently orphan the records that show how the firm priced, staffed and billed work.

For a Deltek consultant or controller, this is also a referral moment. A firm with 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded) and a decade of project accounting is the kind of company that may qualify to license its operational records through SourceX. Companies keep ownership and sign only if price and terms work. You introduce; you never handle the records. The ERP consultant referral guide covers the general playbook.

What does the migration timeline look like, and where does the licensing question fit?

The question belongs in the scoping phase, long before data conversion starts, because the conversion scope is the decision.

PhaseWhat happensWhat to do for the history question
DiscoveryInventory of modules, custom fields, open projectsAsk how many years of closed projects exist and who needs them
Conversion scopingDecide years of history to convertRecommend a full read-only archive even if the live system converts fewer years
Test conversionTrial loads and reconciliationConfirm the archive reconciles to the final year-end balances
CutoverAjera goes read-only or is retiredKeep a backup and export set with a named owner
Post-go-liveUsers find gapsConfirm the archive can still be queried or exported
DecommissionOld server or subscription endsDo not shut it down until the owner signs off on the archive

If the firm is also changing hands, the same sequence applies; coordinate with the M&A advisor before anything is licensed.

Which records are worth keeping, and why do they matter?

A project-accounting history records how a professional-services firm turns hours into invoices. That makes it a connected record of staffing, pricing and outcome, not just a ledger.

Record familyExamplesWhy it can matter to a data buyer
Project setupPhases, tasks, budgets, fee types, contract amountsHow scope was structured and priced
Time and expenseTimesheets by employee, task and date, with approvalsReal effort patterns and review steps
BillingInvoice drafts, edits, write-downs, retainersBilling decisions and adjustments with outcomes
Change managementBudget revisions, amendments, add servicesHow scope creep was handled
ReceivablesAging, collections notes, write-offsPayment outcomes tied to project facts
CloseoutFinal fee versus budget, project status changesEstimate-versus-actual results

Employee-level time data is personal information in part, so redaction and de-identification requirements are agreed with the company before any work begins. Client names and fee terms may carry confidentiality obligations too, which is a rights question for the firm and SourceX to review during qualification.

What is the five-year test for a conversion decision?

Use a simple decision rule when the controller asks how much to convert.

  • Keep the live conversion lean if you wish: converting recent years only is a legitimate way to reduce cutover risk.
  • Archive everything older: preserve the complete Ajera database and report outputs in a named location with an owner.
  • Verify it opens: restore the archive once and confirm projects, time and invoices can be read.
  • Record what was kept: write a one-page list of years, modules and export formats.
  • Name the sponsor: note who at the firm, the principal or CFO, could authorize a licensing review.

The sponsor and rights questions are covered by the company fit checker, a preliminary, non-binding screen that needs no contact details.

How do you bring it up with the controller and the principal?

Talk to the controller about preservation and to the principal about the opportunity. They care about different things.

How does the introduction work?

  1. You register as a partner and use your referral link, or submit the firm through the referral form.
  2. SourceX qualifies size, history, data breadth and rights with the sponsor.
  3. The firm completes a data inventory of each system, its years of history and what can be exported.
  4. Price and terms are agreed. The firm receives one all-in price, with SourceX's fee included.
  5. Buyers review; once a firm is deal-ready they typically respond within about two weeks.
  6. If the firm signs, data is prepared and delivered under agreed redaction rules, and payment follows, typically within about 60 days of invoicing once the buyer selects the data.
  7. Your reward is paid after SourceX receives payment.

Lessons from adjacent triggers apply: the PLM team's cutover logic in PLM migration consultant records and the shutdown-window discipline in call center closing both show why preserving history before decommissioning matters.

What do partners earn, and what should consultants check first?

Partners earn 25% of the eligible platform fees SourceX actually collects from the referred company's licensing deals, capped at $100,000 cumulative per referred company. Rewards become payable only after the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee, and no reward is guaranteed. The reward is never deducted from what the firm receives.

Check your Deltek reseller or services agreements and any client-facing independence or conflict policies before accepting referral compensation. The program terms cover the partner side.

When is a migration not a licensing trigger?

Do not raise it when the firm is under 50 full-time employees at peak, when the old database was already purged or the server wiped, when most work is for clients who forbid use of project information, or when the principals will not consider an exclusive license. A firm that fails today may pass if you preserve the history during this migration. See also fractional CFO records for manufacturers for how controllers think about project cost records.

Next step

At your next scoping call, ask for a read-only archive of the full Ajera history. If the firm looks like a fit, register as a partner and make the introduction, or have the principal apply at sourcex.si/apply with your referral link. The who qualifies page lists the full baseline.

  1. Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
  2. Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
  3. Step 3Buyer selects and paysThe buyer selects and pays for the data and SourceX receives its fee.
  4. Step 4You get your rewardYour share of SourceX fees becomes payable.

Common questions

Do I have to convert every year of Ajera history into Vantagepoint?

No. Many firms convert recent years for daily use and keep older history in a read-only archive. The licensing-relevant point is that the older records still exist and can be exported, not that they live in the new system. Decide conversion scope on operational grounds.

Does a firm that used Ajera for only a few years still qualify?

It can, but history matters. Qualification looks for several years of documented operations, data across many systems and rights to license the material. A short Ajera history may be offset by older records in a prior system that were also preserved.

What happens to employee timesheet data in a licensing deal?

Employee-level data is treated as personal information in part. De-identification and redaction requirements are agreed with the company before any work begins, and data is delivered only after an executed agreement and the company's authorization. The consultant never handles it.

Can I mention licensing to a client during a fixed-scope migration?

Yes, as an observation about preserving history, not as a change order. Keep the project scope as written, recommend the archive, and let the principal decide whether to explore a licensing review. Check your services agreement for any restriction on referral compensation first.

Who at the firm authorizes a licensing introduction?

The sponsor is an owner, CEO, CFO or other authorized representative. In an A/E firm that is often a principal or the finance leader, but the firm decides. A controller can support the process but usually cannot approve a license alone.

Free resources

By SourceX Partnerships Team · Published 2026-10-09 · Updated 2026-10-09

Know a US company with valuable proprietary data?

Become a referral partner from anywhere we support, get your link and introduce an owner or authorized decision-maker.

Refer a company →

I own a business

Explore licensing your company's data to AI developers worldwide. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.

Start an assessment