What should an MSP disclose to clients about vendor referral fees?

An MSP should disclose any vendor referral fee or agent commission to the client in writing before the client buys: who pays you, how the amount is worked out, and whether it changes the client's price. A data licensing introduction differs because the client receives the payment, and your reward comes from SourceX's fee.

The short answer for MSPs

Tell the client in writing, before they decide, who pays you, how the payment is worked out and whether it changes their price. For private advice to a business client, that duty usually comes from your MSA, the vendor's partner program terms and the client's procurement policy. When you recommend in public, the FTC's guidance on endorsements applies, and undisclosed payments for steering a client can raise state-law questions as well.

A data licensing introduction runs the other way from a typical agent commission. The client receives a one-time license payment, and your reward is a share of SourceX's fee, never deducted from what the company receives. That makes the disclosure easier to write, but it still needs writing.

What does the FTC say about paid recommendations?

The FTC expects a clear disclosure whenever a paid connection would change how your audience weighs a recommendation. Its Endorsement Guides, 16 CFR Part 255, include section 255.5 on disclosing material connections between an endorser and the company being recommended. The current text follows revisions the FTC announced in June 2023. The Guides interpret Section 5 of the FTC Act rather than acting as binding rules themselves, but the FTC can investigate practices that are unfair or deceptive.

The staff FAQ, FTC's Endorsement Guides: What People Are Asking, is the practical part for an MSP that publishes content:

  • A connection that a significant minority of your audience would not expect, and that would affect how they weigh the recommendation, should be disclosed clearly and conspicuously.
  • The disclosure belongs close to the recommendation, on each platform where it appears, not buried in comments or a footer.
  • A plain statement such as "I get commissions for purchases made through links in this post" works; the label "affiliate link" on its own may not be understood.
  • No specific wording is mandated.

That covers your website's recommended-tools page, client newsletters, webinar slides and LinkedIn posts. A recommendation made privately in a quarterly business review rests mainly on your contract and the client's trust. Payments the client never hears about raise the separate questions covered in whether an undisclosed referral fee is commercial bribery.

How does a data licensing introduction differ from an agent commission?

The money moves in the opposite direction, and that is the first thing a client should hear.

Question the client will askTypical vendor agent commissionSourceX data licensing introduction
Who pays the MSP?The vendor or distributor, under its partner programSourceX, from the fee it collects on a completed deal
Does the client's cost rise because of it?Depends on the vendor's pricing; ask the vendorNo; the reward is a share of SourceX's fee and is never deducted from what the company receives
Which way does money move for the client?The client pays for a product or serviceThe client receives a one-time license payment
How long can the payment run?Can recur while the client keeps the service, per the vendor's termsPayable once the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee, capped per referred company
What does the MSP do?Often resells, provisions and supports the productMakes the introduction only and never touches the records
When is anything binding?When the client signs the orderOnly when the company agrees price and terms and signs

With a vendor commission, the client buys something and you benefit. With a data licensing introduction, the client may be paid for records it already keeps, and you benefit from the intermediary's fee.

How disclosure applies in common MSP situations

SituationWhat to checkOutcome to confirm
You recommend a backup or security vendor in a QBR while enrolled in its partner programYour MSA, the vendor's program terms, the client's vendor code of conductWritten disclosure in the proposal before the client signs
Your website or newsletter links to tools that pay youFTC Endorsement Guides and the staff FAQA plain disclosure next to each link, on every platform
You introduce a client to SourceXThe program terms, your MSA, the client's procurement policyWritten disclosure before the client applies; you stay out of the data
The client is in financial services or healthcare administrationThe client's own regulatory obligationsThe client decides with its counsel; you share basic fit facts only
The client's policy bars suppliers from receiving third-party paymentsThe client's supplier code of conductDisclose and let the client choose; the company can apply directly without your link

What should the MSA say?

A standing clause means every later disclosure points back to something the client already signed. Adapt this with your counsel:

Then add a one-off note when you raise SourceX:

Why your admin access stays out of it

You hold credentials to exactly the systems a buyer would value, which is why your role has to stop at the introduction. Do not pull sample exports, screenshot a ticket queue or describe a client's records to anyone. The company completes its own data inventory with SourceX, de-identification and redaction requirements are agreed with the company before any work begins, and data is delivered only after an executed agreement and the company's authorization.

The client also has its own promises to check. FTC staff have warned that promises not to use customer data for undisclosed purposes, such as training models, are enforceable whether they appear in privacy policies, terms of service or marketing. That review belongs to the company and its counsel, not to its IT provider.

Your disclosure checklist

  • Our MSA or proposal template mentions third-party compensation.
  • I have read the client's supplier code of conduct, if it has one.
  • The written disclosure names the payer, the calculation and the effect on price.
  • It is dated before the client decides.
  • Public recommendations carry a disclosure next to each link.
  • I have shared only basic fit facts: headcount at peak, years operating, systems in use.

How the SourceX reward is calculated

Partners earn 25% of the eligible platform fees SourceX actually collects from the referred company's licensing deals, capped at $100,000 per referred company. Rewards are payable only after the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee; no reward is guaranteed.

This is general information, not legal, tax or financial advice. Confirm with your own counsel before relying on any clause above.

Next step

Check fit before you raise it: the company fit checker is a preliminary, non-binding screen that needs no contact details. The MSP partner overview covers which clients tend to qualify, and how management consultants handle vendor fees is a useful comparison. When your disclosure wording is ready, register as a partner.

  1. Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
  2. Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
  3. Step 3Buyer selects and paysThe buyer selects and pays for the data and SourceX receives its fee.
  4. Step 4You get your rewardYour share of SourceX fees becomes payable.

Common questions

Is it legal for an MSP to take a referral fee from a vendor?

Whether a vendor referral fee is permitted depends on your industry, the state, your contracts and whether the client knew about it. Undisclosed payments for steering a client carry the most risk, and some client procurement policies forbid supplier payments outright. Written disclosure before the client decides is the safe default, and your own counsel should review the arrangement and your MSA wording.

Do I need to tell the client the exact amount I might earn from SourceX?

The amount is not known until a deal closes and the buyer pays, so describe the formula instead: 25% of the eligible platform fees SourceX collects from the company's licensing deals, capped at $100,000 per referred company, payable only after SourceX receives its fee. Offer to confirm the actual figure in writing if a reward is ever paid.

Will my client receive less because I earn a referral reward?

No. The partner reward is a share of SourceX's fee and is never deducted from what the company receives. The company is quoted one all-in price with SourceX's fee included and no separate charges, and it decides whether to accept the price and terms before anything is signed or delivered.

Can I help gather the client's data for SourceX since I already manage their systems?

Not as a referral partner. Partners make introductions and share basic fit information only; they never export, upload or describe confidential records. The company completes its own data inventory with SourceX, agrees de-identification and redaction requirements before work begins and authorizes delivery only after an executed agreement. Pulling samples to show interest would put you outside that role.

What if my client's supplier code of conduct bans third-party payments?

Respect it. Disclose the program, explain that the reward would come from SourceX's fee rather than the client's proceeds, and let the client decide. If the policy still rules out any payment to you, the company can apply directly at sourcex.si/apply without your referral link, so no reward is attributed to you.

Free resources

By SourceX Partnerships Team · Published 2026-10-09 · Updated 2026-10-09

Know a US company with valuable proprietary data?

Become a referral partner from anywhere we support, get your link and introduce an owner or authorized decision-maker.

Refer a company →

I own a business

Explore licensing your company's data to AI developers worldwide. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.

Start an assessment