Management fee offsets and referral income: what PE firms should check first

A private equity management fee offset reduces the management fee LPs pay by a share of the fees the adviser, GP or affiliates earn from portfolio companies, as the LPA defines them. Whether a referral reward tied to a portfolio company is caught depends on that definition, who receives it and the firm's conflict rules, so ask fund counsel first.

The short answer: the LPA definition decides

A management fee offset reduces the management fee that limited partners pay by a percentage of certain fees the adviser, the general partner or their affiliates receive in connection with portfolio companies. Whether a referral reward linked to a portfolio company is caught depends on how the limited partnership agreement defines those fees, who receives the reward and what the firm's conflict policies require. Settle it with fund counsel and your chief compliance officer before any introduction, not after a deal closes.

The timing matters. An operating partner who introduces a portfolio company to SourceX could become entitled to a reward months later, once the company has licensed data and the buyer has paid. By then the deal team, the portfolio company's board and the LPs may all want to know who received it and why. For private equity operating partners, the clean approach is to decide the treatment on day one and write it down.

The three-question fee test

Run these three questions before anyone at the firm registers as a partner.

  • Who receives it? The management company, the general partner, the fund itself, an employee personally, or an independent operating advisor working under a consulting agreement.
  • What does the LPA call it? Whether the defined term (often fee income, portfolio company fees, special fees or transaction fees) covers only payments made by portfolio companies or reaches any compensation received in connection with a portfolio investment.
  • Who has been told? Whether the portfolio company's board, the LPAC or the LPs need notice or consent under the fund documents and the firm's conflicts policy.

If any answer is unclear, pause, ask counsel and record the decision in a memo to file.

Where the rules actually sit

Fee offsets are contractual: each fund's documents set the categories and the percentage, and side letters can change them for particular investors. Securities-law duties that apply to an investment adviser sit on top of the contract; fund counsel will know which apply, and this page does not interpret them. Look in these places.

DocumentClause to findWhat it tells you
Limited partnership agreementManagement fee section; definitions of fee income and affiliateWhich fees are offset, at what percentage, and whose receipts count
Side lettersFee, reporting and most-favored-nation termsWhether some LPs negotiated broader offsets or extra reporting
Private placement memorandum and investor disclosuresConflicts of interest sectionWhich conflicts investors were told about when they committed
Compliance manual and code of ethicsOutside compensation, gifts and conflicts rulesWhether individuals may keep any third-party payment
Employment or consulting agreementOutside fees and exclusivity clausesWhether an operating partner must remit outside income to the firm
Portfolio company governance documentsRelated-party and board conflict policiesWhether the board must approve a transaction an insider benefits from

How the SourceX reward is structured

Partners earn 25% of the eligible platform fees SourceX actually collects from the referred company's licensing deals, capped at $100,000 per referred company. The reward becomes payable only after the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee; an introduction, meeting or signed agreement alone does not trigger payment, and no reward is guaranteed. Details beyond that are set by the signed partner agreement and the program terms, and the rewards page explains the mechanics.

Two features matter for the offset analysis. First, the reward is a share of SourceX's fee and is never deducted from what the portfolio company receives, so no separate charge falls on the company; that is a factual difference from a monitoring or transaction fee charged to the company, but whether your LPA definition still reaches it is a question for counsel. Second, it is compensation tied to a portfolio company transaction that a firm insider may influence, so a broadly worded definition can capture it, and the conflict question exists whichever way the offset question is answered.

Decide the payee early. The partner agreement and the program terms govern who is paid and what tax paperwork is requested. For a US payee, the IRS describes Form W-9 as the way to give a taxpayer identification number to a payer that must file an information return reporting amounts paid to you. Registering the management company rather than an individual, or the reverse, can change both the offset analysis and the paperwork, so ask your tax adviser.

How it applies in common situations

SituationWhat to checkTypical outcome to confirm with fund counsel
A firm employee introduces a current portfolio companyFee income and affiliate definitions, employee remittance policyReward treated as firm income and offset, or declined
An independent operating advisor introduces a portfolio companyWhether the advisor is an affiliate under the LPA, and the consulting agreementMay fall outside the offset; disclosure to the firm and the board is still expected
The firm introduces a company it does not ownNDAs signed on passed deals, and the code of ethicsUsually outside the offset; confidential deal information cannot be used to make the referral
The company sits in a fund on extension or in a continuation vehicleWhich vehicle's documents govern, and any LPAC consentThe governing vehicle's terms apply; LPAC review may be needed
The firm wants the benefit to reach LPsWhether the fund can receive this income, and its tax treatmentCounsel and the fund's tax adviser decide the route
The introducer holds a FINRA registration through an affiliated broker-dealerOutside activity rules and the broker-dealer's approval processAsk compliance whether pre-approval is required before registering

On the last row, FINRA reported that the SEC approved new FINRA Rule 3290 on September 15, 2026, replacing Rules 3270 and 3280, with the effective date to be announced in a Regulatory Notice; until then the existing rules apply. Registered persons should ask their firm's compliance team which rules govern their situation.

Disclosure habits worth adopting before an LP asks

  • Write a short memo before the introduction: who registers, who receives any reward, and whether it is offset.
  • Tell the portfolio company's board that a referral relationship exists, so the license is judged on its own terms, and consider whether the introducer should step back from the board's vote.
  • Follow the LPA on LP reporting and LPAC review, and log the arrangement in the firm's conflicts register.
  • Keep the economics visible: the company's license price is unaffected because the reward comes out of SourceX's fee.
  • Revisit the memo if the company moves to another vehicle before a deal closes.

Questions to ask fund counsel and your CCO

  1. Does our definition of fee income reach third-party payments connected to a portfolio company, or only payments from the company itself?
  2. Are operating partners and senior advisors affiliates for offset purposes?
  3. What offset percentage applies, and do any side letters change it?
  4. Must employees remit outside compensation to the management company?
  5. Does this need LPAC review or LP disclosure, and in which report?
  6. Which entity should register as the partner and sign the tax forms?
  7. Does anyone involved hold a registration that requires pre-clearance?

This is general information, not legal, tax or financial advice. Confirm with your own counsel, tax adviser or professional body before acting.

When the simplest answer is to decline

Two clean options exist. The first is to decide the analysis is not worth it for a single introduction: point the company to apply directly, with no referral, and let the license stand or fall on its merits. The second is to register one entity, agree a standing treatment with counsel and apply it to every portfolio introduction.

Ownership structure changes the question. A permanent-capital holding company that charges no management fee has nothing to offset in the LPA sense, though it still has conflict and disclosure questions; the comparison of permanent capital vs private equity sets out how a one-time license plays in each model. Whatever the structure, the company itself must clear the baseline described on the who qualifies page.

Next step

Agree the fee test with counsel first. Then screen the company with the company fit checker and register as a partner under the entity your counsel approved, or have the company apply directly at sourcex.si/apply.

  1. Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
  2. Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
  3. Step 3Buyer selects and paysThe buyer selects and pays for the data and SourceX receives its fee.
  4. Step 4You get your rewardYour share of SourceX fees becomes payable.

Common questions

Does the portfolio company pay the referral reward?

No. The reward is a share of the fee SourceX collects and is never deducted from what the portfolio company receives. The company agrees one all-in price that already includes SourceX's fee, with no separate charges. That separation may matter to the offset analysis, but it does not remove the conflict question, because a firm insider still benefits from a transaction at a company the firm controls.

Can the firm make the introduction without taking any reward?

Yes. The simplest route is to have the company apply directly at sourcex.si/apply without a referral, so no partner reward arises at all. That removes the offset question but not the governance one: the portfolio company's board should still evaluate the license on its own merits, and any interest the firm's policies require to be disclosed should still be disclosed.

When should a firm settle the offset question?

Before the introduction. Rewards are paid only after a buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee, which can be well after the first conversation, and by then the board, the deal team and LPs may each have a view. A short memo agreed with fund counsel and the chief compliance officer at the start records who registered, who gets paid and how the payment is treated.

Do independent operating advisors face the same offset rules?

Not necessarily. Offsets usually turn on whether the recipient is the adviser, the general partner or an affiliate as the LPA defines it, and an independent advisor under a consulting agreement may or may not fall inside that definition. The consulting agreement may also require the advisor to disclose or remit outside income. Check both documents and tell the sponsor before registering.

Does a referral reward create a board conflict for an operating partner?

It can. An operating partner who sits on the portfolio company's board and stands to receive a reward from a transaction the board approves has a personal interest in that decision. Disclose the interest to the board, follow its related-party or conflicts policy, and consider stepping back from the vote. Routing the reward to the firm does not by itself remove the need to disclose.

Free resources

By SourceX Partnerships Team · Published 2026-10-09 · Updated 2026-10-09

Know a US company with valuable proprietary data?

Become a referral partner from anywhere we support, get your link and introduce an owner or authorized decision-maker.

Refer a company →

I own a business

Explore licensing your company's data to AI developers worldwide. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.

Start an assessment