M&A broker exemption under section 15(b)(13): who it covers and what it does not
Exchange Act section 15(b)(13), effective March 29, 2023, exempts M&A brokers from SEC registration when they effect securities transactions solely to transfer ownership of an eligible privately held company (prior-year EBITDA under $25 million or gross revenues under $250 million), subject to conduct conditions. It does not address data-licensing introductions.
The short answer
Section 15(b)(13) of the Securities Exchange Act lets an M&A broker help transfer ownership of a small private company without registering with the SEC as a broker, provided the company passes the size tests and the broker meets the conduct conditions. It is a narrow, transaction-specific exemption. It is not a finder exemption, it does not cover capital raising, it does not override state registration rules or FINRA obligations, and it says nothing about introductions for data licensing.
Where the exemption came from
Congress added the exemption in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, signed on December 29, 2022. It took effect on March 29, 2023, and SEC staff withdrew the 2014 M&A Brokers no-action letter the same day, as Morrison & Foerster's alert records. The statutory text sits in 15 U.S.C. 78o. Law firms noted at the time that the statute is narrower than the 2014 no-action relief and applies only to M&A transactions involving small private companies (Jones Day).
The background rule matters. Section 15(a) generally makes it unlawful for an unregistered broker to effect, or induce or attempt to induce, securities transactions, and lets the SEC exempt brokers by rule or order. Whether a person is acting as a broker depends on what they actually do; the SEC's Guide to Broker-Dealer Registration explains the definitions, though it predates the 2023 statute.
The eligibility tests at a glance
| Test | Requirement | Where it comes from |
|---|---|---|
| Transaction purpose | Securities transactions solely in connection with transferring ownership of an eligible privately held company | Section 15(b)(13) |
| Not a reporting company | No class of securities registered under Section 12 and no reporting obligation under Section 15(d) | Section 15(b)(13) |
| Size | In the fiscal year before the engagement, EBITDA under $25 million or gross revenues under $250 million; either test is enough | Section 15(b)(13); the SEC may adjust the figures by rule |
| Buyer | The broker reasonably believes the buyer will control the company and be actively involved in managing it after the deal | Statute, as summarized by Greenberg Traurig |
| Custody | The broker does not hold the parties' funds or securities | Same |
| Shell companies | Transactions involving shell companies are excluded | Same |
| Capital raising | Not covered | Same |
| State law | Not preempted; state broker-dealer registration may still apply | Same |
Read the statute itself before relying on any summary, including this one. The conditions interact, and a single failed condition takes the transaction outside the exemption.
How it applies in common advisor situations
| Situation | What to check | Typical outcome to confirm |
|---|---|---|
| Sell-side mandate for a founder-owned company within the size tests, buyer taking control | Prior fiscal year EBITDA and revenue, the buyer's plan to manage, custody, shell status | The exemption may apply if every condition holds; confirm with securities counsel |
| Minority growth recapitalization | Whether any part is capital raising, and whether the buyer gains control | Likely outside the exemption as summarized; get counsel's view |
| Passive financial buyer that will not manage the company | The control and active-management condition | The buyer condition may fail |
| Target above both size tests | Prior fiscal year figures | Outside the exemption |
| Advisor holds FINRA registrations at a broker-dealer | Firm policies on outside activities and private securities transactions; FINRA Rule 2040 on payments to unregistered persons | FINRA rules and firm policies still apply, as industry commentary from Finalis points out |
| Deal in a state with its own broker rules | State registration and any state-level exemption | Check state law separately |
| Introducing a client company to SourceX for a data license | Engagement letter, client disclosure, timing against any sale | Not an M&A securities transaction; 15(b)(13) is not the framework, so take the question to counsel |
What the exemption does not do
- It is not a finder exemption. The SEC proposed a conditional exemption for finders in private capital raising in 2020 but did not finalize it, as the SEC's own July 2025 advisory committee agenda states. Neither that proposal nor section 15(b)(13) is a safe harbor for referral partners.
- It does not cover capital raising. Placing equity or debt for a client is outside it.
- It does not change FINRA obligations. Registered people remain subject to FINRA rules and their firm's policies.
- It does not preempt the states. State registration requirements still need their own analysis.
- It does not reach commercial contracts that are not securities transactions, such as a license of a company's data.
Where a SourceX introduction sits
A SourceX introduction connects a company with a data licensing process. The company keeps ownership of the business and of its data, grants a license (typically exclusive for AI training for an agreed term), and receives one all-in price as a one-time payment. No shares change hands and no ownership transfers. That is why the M&A broker exemption is not the relevant framework for the introduction, and SourceX does not present it, or any other exemption, as covering its partners. If you are unsure whether any registration or licensing rule applies to what you do, ask securities counsel and, if you are registered, your compliance team.
For an advisor with a live mandate, three practical points follow:
- Disclose the reward to the client in writing. Partners earn 25% of the eligible platform fees SourceX actually collects from the referred company's licensing deals, capped at $100,000 per referred company; rewards become payable only after the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee, and no reward is guaranteed. The reward is a share of SourceX's fee and never reduces what the client receives.
- Read your engagement letter. Look for exclusivity, fee-tail or conflict clauses that could touch a separate payment connected to the same client.
- Time the license against the sale process. An exclusive AI-training license is a contract that will surface in buyer diligence, so decide with the client and deal counsel whether it should close before signing, between signing and closing, or after.
How the introduction works for an M&A advisor
Raise it with sell-side clients that are US businesses which peaked at 50+ full-time employees (contractors excluded), have run for several years, can license their records and have an owner or executive ready to sponsor the work. The company fit checker gives a quick, non-binding read before you raise it.
- You register, then send the seller or CEO your referral link, or submit the company through the referral form.
- SourceX checks size, operating history, breadth of records and rights with the company's sponsor.
- The company lists its systems, years of history and exportable records in a data inventory.
- SourceX and the company agree one all-in price and the license terms before buyers see anything.
- AI labs and data buyers review the opportunity; once a company is deal-ready, buyers typically respond within about two weeks.
- The company signs, delivers under redaction rules agreed in advance, and is paid; your reward follows once SourceX receives its fee.
You never export, upload or describe the client's confidential records. Your role ends at the introduction and basic fit information.
Questions to ask your counsel or compliance team
- Does every condition of section 15(b)(13) hold for this mandate, including the prior fiscal year size test and the buyer's plans to manage?
- Which state registration rules apply to the deal, and to me?
- If I am registered, does my firm treat a SourceX referral as an outside activity, and what approval does it need?
- Does my engagement letter require me to disclose or share third-party compensation with the client?
- Could the timing or exclusivity of a data license affect the sale process or the purchase agreement?
This is general information, not legal, tax or financial advice. Confirm with your own counsel, tax adviser or professional body before acting.
Next step
Advisors who also sit on client boards should read whether a board member can earn a referral reward, and those inside CPA firms should check whether a CPA can accept a referral fee. For the wider picture, see referral opportunities for M&A advisors and the program terms. When you have a client in mind, register as a partner.
- Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
- Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
- Step 3Buyer selects and paysThe buyer selects and pays for the data and SourceX receives its fee.
- Step 4You get your rewardYour share of SourceX fees becomes payable.
Common questions
Does section 15(b)(13) cover raising growth equity or debt for a client?
No. The exemption covers securities transactions solely in connection with transferring ownership of an eligible privately held company to a buyer who will control and actively manage it. Capital raising falls outside it, as law-firm summaries of the statute make clear. An advisor who places equity or debt needs a separate analysis of broker registration, usually with securities counsel.
Do I still need state registration if the federal exemption applies?
Possibly. The federal exemption does not preempt state broker-dealer registration requirements, so each state where you operate or where the parties sit needs its own check. State approaches to M&A brokers vary. Ask counsel to map the states involved in each mandate rather than assuming the federal exemption settles the question.
Can I still rely on the SEC's 2014 M&A brokers no-action letter?
No. SEC staff withdrew the 2014 M&A Brokers no-action letter on March 29, 2023, the day the statutory exemption took effect. The statute is now the federal framework, and its terms are narrower than the old letter in several respects. Advisors who built their practice around the 2014 relief should review their engagements against the statute with counsel.
Does a private equity buyer satisfy the control condition?
It can, if the broker reasonably believes the buyer will control the company and be actively involved in managing it after closing. A sponsor acquiring a majority stake and board control may meet that description, while a minority or passive financial investor may not. The facts of each deal decide it, so document your basis and confirm it with securities counsel.
Does introducing a sell-side client to SourceX affect my use of the exemption?
The exemption concerns securities transactions in M&A, and a data license is a commercial contract in which no ownership changes hands. The SourceX introduction and any reward sit outside the exemption's framework rather than inside it. Disclose the reward to your client, check your engagement letter and your firm's policies, and ask counsel if you are unsure how the two activities interact.
Related pages
Free resources
- Enterprise value calculator — Enterprise value from equity value, debt and cash.
- Earnout scenario calculator — Probability-weighted earnout value and its present value.
- Profit margin calculator — Profit and margin across three scenarios.
- All free tools · MCP resource center
By SourceX Partnerships Team · Published 2026-10-09 · Updated 2026-10-09
Know a US company with valuable proprietary data?
Become a referral partner from anywhere we support, get your link and introduce an owner or authorized decision-maker.
Refer a company →I own a business
Explore licensing your company's data to AI developers worldwide. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.
Start an assessment