How to answer value creation questions in an ILPA due diligence questionnaire
Answer ILPA DDQ value creation questions with evidence rather than adjectives: who is on the operating team and how they engage, the repeatable process from entry to exit, how initiatives are chosen and measured, and the policies portfolio companies follow. Describe early initiatives, such as a data licensing review, by status and scope, never by projected results.
The short answer: show the system, then the proof
LPs read the value creation answers in a DDQ to judge whether past returns came from a repeatable operating model or from market tailwinds. The strongest answers describe a system (who does the work, how initiatives are chosen, how progress is measured) and then attach evidence that the system was applied more than once.
This carries more weight than it used to. McKinsey's Global Private Markets Report 2026 found that 53 percent of 300 surveyed LPs ranked a GP's value-creation strategy among their top five selection criteria, and that firms have more than doubled their operating groups since 2021 (McKinsey Global Private Markets Report). More operating teams means more answers that sound alike, so specifics are what set yours apart.
Where value creation shows up in the ILPA DDQ
ILPA publishes a standardized DDQ that many LPs send as-is or adapt. Value creation is not confined to one section: it surfaces wherever the questionnaire asks about the team, the investment process, monitoring and portfolio company policies. Section numbering changes between versions and LPs add their own questions, so map your answers to the exact template you receive.
| Topic area | What the LP is testing | Evidence to attach |
|---|---|---|
| Firm and strategy | Whether value creation is part of the stated thesis or an afterthought | A strategy statement consistent with the PPM |
| Team and key persons | Who leads operations, their tenure and the time committed to this fund | An operating team roster with roles and time allocation |
| Investment process | How value creation plans are built during diligence | A redacted 100-day plan template |
| Portfolio monitoring and reporting | How progress is measured and escalated | A sample KPI pack and the board reporting calendar |
| Portfolio company policies | Which policies companies are expected to adopt | The policy list with adoption status by company |
| Fees and expenses | Who pays for operating resources | The allocation policy for operating partner costs |
| Track record | How much past value came from operations | Your value bridge method and worked examples |
What to gather before you draft
- The operating team roster: names, titles, tenure, prior roles and the share of time each person spends on this fund's companies.
- How operating resources are paid for (fund, management company or portfolio company) and the policy that governs it.
- One redacted 100-day plan and one quarterly value creation review from a real company.
- An initiative register, current to the last quarter-end.
- The KPI definitions used across the portfolio, so DDQ figures reconcile to board packs; the guide to KPI benchmarking across portfolio companies covers set-up and limits.
- The PPM, the last DDQ you submitted and current marketing materials, so the language stays consistent.
Step by step: drafting the value creation answers
- Build the initiative register. One row per initiative: name, companies involved, start date, owner, status, metric and how results are attributed. A value creation office usually keeps this already; if not, rebuild it from board minutes.
- Classify every initiative honestly. Use three labels: repeated (applied at several companies with measured results), in progress (started and measured, not complete) and exploratory (being screened or piloted). LPs trust the first group more when the other two are visible.
- Describe who does the work. Say whether operating partners sit alongside management, advise from the board or run functional programs across companies, and who pays for their time. The guide to how LPs evaluate an operating partner model covers what they probe here.
- Walk through the process once, end to end. Diligence findings, the 100-day plan, quarterly reviews, and how initiatives are stopped when they do not work.
- Prove repeatability with counts. An illustrative line such as pricing reviews completed at six of nine Fund II companies says more than a claim of deep pricing expertise.
- Separate operations from market effects. Show the value bridge method (revenue growth, margin change, multiple change, leverage) and apply it the same way to every example.
- Describe exploratory initiatives by status and scope. No projections and no implied results.
- Reconcile, then review. Check every figure against the PPM and prior DDQs, then send the draft through compliance; the guide to presenting initiatives under the SEC Marketing Rule covers fair presentation of examples.
How to describe a data licensing review without overclaiming
AI questions now appear throughout DDQs (see how GPs answer responsible AI questions), and a data licensing review is one place an operating team can show it is responding to the shift without overstating it. The review screens portfolio companies for operational records that AI developers license for training and evaluation, and introduces qualifying companies to SourceX, which runs inventory, buyer review, contracting and delivery. Each company decides for itself, and any payment is one-time.
| Overclaim | Accurate version |
|---|---|
| A new AI revenue stream across the portfolio | A screening program that identifies portfolio companies with licensable operational records |
| Expected to add {x} to portfolio EBITDA | Any license is a one-time payment, reported as non-recurring and excluded from run-rate earnings |
| Partnerships with leading AI labs | Introductions to SourceX, which manages the licensing process with AI labs and data buyers |
| Monetizing portfolio data | Companies license an agreed set of their own records, keep ownership, and are bound only once they sign |
| Completed at several companies (when it was not) | {n} companies screened, {n} introduced, {n} completed to date, with real numbers including zero |
If the operating team acts as a referral partner, the economics need to be clear before the DDQ describes the program. Partners earn 25% of the eligible platform fees SourceX collects from a referred company's licensing deals, up to $100,000 per referred company, payable only after the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee; the reward is never deducted from the company's proceeds. Whether the GP or its staff may accept such a payment, and whether it must be offset against management fees or disclosed as a conflict, depends on your LPA and policies, so take it to fund counsel before anyone registers. This is general information, not legal, tax or financial advice.
Common mistakes
| Mistake | Why it hurts | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Presenting every initiative as a success | Reads as marketing and invites reference checks | Use the repeated, in progress and exploratory labels |
| Listing operating partners who have left | Triggers key-person questions and undermines trust | Update the roster every quarter |
| Figures that differ from the PPM or the last DDQ | LPs compare documents line by line | Keep one master answer library with a source for each figure |
| Attributing multiple expansion to operations | Overstates the operating model | Apply one value bridge method to every example |
| Leaving out who pays for operating resources | Fee and expense allocation is a standard LP concern | State the policy plainly |
| Projecting results for exploratory work | Creates a commitment you may not meet | Describe scope and status only |
Example answer (Illustrative)
Illustrative and fictional. The question asks the GP to describe its approach to value creation and give examples.
Notice what the example avoids: no projected proceeds, no buyer names, no suggestion that screening equals revenue.
Next step
Add the screening program to your initiative register, list candidate companies with the network opportunity finder and check them against who qualifies. If the team will make introductions, register as a partner once fund counsel has reviewed the arrangement.
- Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
- Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
- Step 3Buyer selects and paysThe buyer selects and pays for the data and SourceX receives its fee.
- Step 4You get your rewardYour share of SourceX fees becomes payable.
Common questions
Should we include initiatives that have not produced results yet?
Yes, if they are labeled accurately. An exploratory or in-progress label shows the operating team is still developing new levers, and LPs generally read a mix of proven and early programs as more credible than a list of uniform successes. State scope and status, avoid projections, and change the label when the initiative completes or is dropped.
Who should own the value creation section, IR or the operating team?
IR should own the document and the consistency checks, while the operating team owns the facts. A workable split is for operating partners to maintain the initiative register and supply examples, IR to draft against the LP's template, and compliance to review before anything is sent. Agree that split before fundraising starts, not when the first DDQ arrives.
How often should DDQ value creation answers be refreshed?
Keep a master answer library and refresh the value creation material at least once a year and before each fundraise, with quarterly updates to the team roster and initiative register. LPs compare DDQs across years and against the PPM, so a dated library with a source for every figure makes follow-up questions easier to answer consistently.
Do referral payments linked to portfolio company introductions need to be disclosed to LPs?
That depends on your LPA, your conflicts policy and the rules that apply to your firm, so ask fund counsel. Many LPAs address fees that the GP or its affiliates receive in connection with portfolio companies, and some require offsets against the management fee. Settle the treatment before anyone on the team registers as a referral partner, then describe it consistently.
Can we name portfolio companies and their results in DDQ examples?
Only with care. Check confidentiality obligations to each company, get management's agreement where results are specific, and run examples through compliance for fair presentation. Many GPs anonymize examples by sector and size, which still demonstrates the method while limiting disclosure. Make sure anonymized figures reconcile to the same source data as any named version you have used elsewhere.
Related pages
- How to benchmark KPIs across portfolio companies, and where benchmarking ends
- Value creation office at a portfolio company: structure and tracking
- How LPs evaluate operating partners, and what to prepare before a raise
- How should private equity firms present case studies under the SEC Marketing Rule?
- How do GPs answer responsible AI questions in LP due diligence questionnaires?
- Map your network to potential US data referral opportunities
Free resources
- Business exit readiness assessment — A preliminary exit readiness score and checklist for advisors.
- SDE vs EBITDA calculator — Seller's discretionary earnings next to market-rate EBITDA.
- IRR calculator — Internal rate of return on annual cash flows.
- All free tools · MCP resource center
By SourceX Partnerships Team · Published 2026-10-09 · Updated 2026-10-09
Know a US company with valuable proprietary data?
Become a referral partner from anywhere we support, get your link and introduce an owner or authorized decision-maker.
Refer a company →I own a business
Explore licensing your company's data to AI developers worldwide. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.
Start an assessment