Form 6765 Section G: what it asks for and the records behind each business component

Form 6765 Section G asks research credit claimants to report information by business component, such as what each component is, the information the research sought to discover and the qualified research expenses tied to it. Whether it is required depends on the tax year and the filer, so check the current IRS instructions before scoping the work.

Is Section G required on your client's Form 6765?

It depends on the tax year and the filer. Section G is the business component information section of Form 6765, Credit for Increasing Research Activities, added when the IRS redesigned the form. The IRS has phased it in, with years in which it was optional and exceptions for some smaller filers, so the answer for any return comes from the Instructions for Form 6765 for that tax year. Check them before you scope the engagement, not after the credit study is finished.

The direction is not in doubt: the IRS wants credit claims tied to identifiable business components, with the information sought and the expenses behind each one. Companies that already organize engineering records by project find Section G manageable. Companies that do not will find it expensive. The related expensing rules are covered separately in Section 174A explained.

What Section G asks for

In summary, Section G collects information about each business component the claim relies on. The instructions set out the exact fields, the order of reporting and how many components must be listed; the paraphrase below is a planning aid, not a substitute for reading them.

ElementWhat it means in practiceWhere the support usually comes from
Component identificationA name or identifier for each product, process, software, technique, formula or inventionProduct roadmap, epic list, project codes
Component typeWhether the component is a product, process, software, technique, formula or inventionProduct requirement documents, release notes
Software designationWhether software is internal-use software, which faces a higher thresholdArchitecture notes, who uses the system
Information soughtThe technical information the research was meant to discoverDesign docs, spike tickets, test plans
Expenses by componentQualified research expenses allocated to each component, by categoryPayroll and time allocation, supplier and contractor invoices

Expect the largest components to carry the most documentation weight, and confirm any current thresholds or small-filer exceptions directly in the instructions. For which software activities can qualify in the first place, see R&D tax credit for software development.

How Section G applies in common client situations

SituationWhat to checkTypical outcome to confirm
SaaS company working in agile sprintsHow epics or features map to business componentsA component list that mirrors the product roadmap
Internal tools built for back-office useWhether the internal-use software rules applyFewer qualifying components, with more support for each
Engineering done by outside contractorsContract terms on payment risk and substantial rightsSome work may be funded research or belong to the contractor
Client doing research for its own customersWho keeps substantial rights to the resultsThe client may not be entitled to claim the work
Smaller filerWhether a Section G exception applies for the yearSection G may be optional while other sections still apply
Acquisition during the yearHow the acquired company's research is treated in the groupCoordination with the acquirer's credit computation

Two rows matter beyond the credit. The contractor and customer-research questions are the same ownership questions a data licensing review asks: whether the company, its contractors or its customers own the work product and the records.

How to build the business component file

  1. Start with the product or engineering leader, not the general ledger. Ask for the epics, projects or features worked on during the year.
  2. Group them into business components and agree names that match the client's own records.
  3. Map payroll and time to each component using time tracking, sprint assignments or an allocation method your firm accepts.
  4. For each component, collect the ticket, pull request and design records that show the information sought and the alternatives evaluated.
  5. Flag contractor and customer-funded work separately and pull the contracts.
  6. Leave the records in the client's systems. Workpapers should reference them, not copy whole repositories.

What Section G work reveals about a client's records

Preparing Section G works like an x-ray of a client's engineering history. You learn whether tickets link to pull requests, whether design decisions are written down, how many systems the team uses and how many years the records go back. Clients with clean, connected records across several years fit the profile AI labs and data buyers look for when they license engineering histories through SourceX, provided the company also clears the baseline: 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded), a multi-year operating record, the right to license its data, and a sponsor such as the owner, CEO or CFO.

Keep the tax engagement and any licensing conversation apart. Raise licensing only after the return work is done, only with the CEO or CFO, and only as an option they are free to decline. Do not use tax return information to decide whom to approach, and do not describe a client's records to anyone outside the firm. If the client is interested, they can apply through your referral link, or you can submit the company with basic fit information once they agree. The accountants partner page explains the program for firms, and the guide to CAS growth at Top 100 accounting firms covers what that growth means for referral relationships.

Fee, disclosure and consent rules for CPA referral partners

Referral rewards to CPAs are shaped by professional and state rules, and those rules vary.

  • The AICPA Code. ET 1.520 in the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct bars a member in public practice from accepting a commission for recommending a product or service to a client for whom the firm does attest work (audits, reviews, certain compilations or examinations of prospective financial information), and any permitted commission or referral fee has to be disclosed to the client. A credit-study client can also be an audit or review client, so check the attest list before anything else.
  • State statutes. Florida regulates CPA contingent fees, commissions and referral fees in section 473.3205 of its statutes, including restrictions on referral fees connected with certain public accounting services and written disclosure of commissions. The linked text is the 2017 version, so check the current statute.
  • Stricter state rules. State requirements can go beyond the AICPA Code. The New Jersey Society of CPAs' resource on commissions and contingent fees notes that a licensee there may not receive a contingent fee for preparing an original or amended tax return, which matters when a credit claim is made on an amended return.
  • Tax reporting. Partners paid as independent contractors may receive a Form 1099-NEC. The reporting threshold changed recently, so check the IRS Instructions for Forms 1099-MISC and 1099-NEC for the year of payment and confirm with your tax adviser.

Partners earn 25% of the eligible platform fees SourceX actually collects from the referred company's licensing deals, capped at $100,000 per referred company. Rewards become payable only after the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee; a lead, meeting or signed agreement alone does not trigger payment, and no reward is guaranteed. The reward is paid from SourceX's fee, not from the client's proceeds.

Questions to ask your ethics partner or counsel

  • Does the firm perform any attest service for this client, and what does that mean for a referral reward?
  • What does our state board require for disclosing referral fees, and in what form?
  • Do our engagement letters or privacy notice limit how we use client information to suggest outside services?
  • What consent is needed before any tax return information informs a recommendation?
  • Who in the firm registers as the partner, and how is credit recorded internally, including after a merger such as those described in accounting firm M&A in 2026?
  • How should the reward be reported and taxed for the firm or the individual?

This is general information, not legal, tax or financial advice. Confirm with your own counsel, tax adviser or professional body before acting.

Next step

When this season's Section G work shows a client with years of well-linked engineering records, check it against who qualifies and the company fit checker. After the return is filed and the client agrees, register as a partner and make the introduction.

  1. Step 1Share your linkSend your personal link to a company you know.
  2. Step 2Company appliesThe company applies itself at /apply.
  3. Step 3Buyer selects and paysThe buyer selects and pays for the data and SourceX receives its fee.
  4. Step 4You get your rewardYour share of SourceX fees becomes payable.

Common questions

Does Section G replace the need for a full credit study?

No. Section G summarizes information by business component on the form, but the claim still rests on records showing that each component meets the four-part test and that expenses were computed properly. A study, or at least an organized file, is what lets the preparer complete Section G accurately and support it if the IRS asks questions.

Do we have to report every business component in Section G?

Not necessarily. The instructions explain how many business components must be reported, in what order and whether any limit applies, and those details have changed as the section was phased in. Check the current-year instructions before deciding which components to list, and keep support for every component in the claim, reported or not, because the whole claim can still be examined.

What if a client's engineering records are too thin to complete Section G?

Start capturing records now and document the current year properly; reconstructing past years from memory is weak support. Interviews, calendars and code history can fill some gaps, but the claim may need to be narrower. Thin records also mean the client is unlikely to be a strong candidate for a data licensing introduction until its history deepens.

Can a preparer mention data licensing during the credit engagement?

Keep the two apart. Complete the credit work on its own terms, then, if the client looks like a fit, raise licensing separately with the CEO or CFO as an optional idea. Do not use tax return information to target the conversation, and disclose any referral fee the firm could receive, following your professional and state rules.

Is Section G information ever shared with SourceX?

No. The form is part of the client's return, so it is tax return information and stays under the firm's confidentiality and preparer-disclosure obligations. If the client chooses to explore licensing, the client describes its own systems and history directly to SourceX during qualification, and the preparer's workpapers never leave the firm.

Free resources

By SourceX Partnerships Team · Published 2026-10-09 · Updated 2026-10-09

Know a US company with valuable proprietary data?

Become a referral partner from anywhere we support, get your link and introduce an owner or authorized decision-maker.

Refer a company →

I own a business

Explore licensing your company's data to AI developers worldwide. Start a short assessment; no uploads needed.

Start an assessment