Search guides, questions and resources

Yes, a company with no in-house IT team can qualify, because a missing IT department is not a red flag. The company authorizes, its MSP or generalist can help export under the company's instruction, and SourceX manages the licensing process.

Yes, a construction company with 50+ full-time employees at peak can license its own RFIs, submittals, change orders and daily logs if it owns them and its contracts allow it. Drawings, owner-confidential material and client-controlled records usually stay out, so confirm rights before any introduction.

A CPA can accept a referral fee or commission only where the AICPA Code and state rules allow it: under ET 1.520, never for a client the firm audits, reviews, examines forecasts for, or compiles statements for third-party use without an independence disclosure, and only with disclosure for other clients. State boards can be stricter.

Yes, an unpaid introduction can usually be made, but accepting a reward is the problem. Under the AICPA commissions and referral fees rule, a member may not accept a commission for recommending a service to a client for whom the firm performs an audit, review or certain other attest work. Waive the reward, document it, and stay out of management decisions.

A creditor can introduce a debtor to SourceX, but a reward creates a conflict that must be disclosed, and some creditors should not take one. Committee members and lenders face the most limits. When a trustee, assignee or restructuring officer controls the records, introduce to them instead.

A distributor can generally license its own sales, order and service records, but supplier price files and rebate terms are usually confidential under supply agreements. Scope and redaction handle this: those files are excluded and supplier cost fields masked, agreed with the company before work begins. Counsel should read the actual contracts.

Whether a Dutch accountant may accept a referral fee depends on NBA membership, whether the firm does assurance work for the company, how the reward is structured and whether it is disclosed. Read the NBA rules and confirm with the NBA before registering as a partner.

A fee-only planner should treat a referral reward as a likely problem for the label. Fee-only standards, including the CFP Board's and NAPFA's, restrict sales-related compensation, and pay for referring a client to a third party can fall inside that. Check the current standard text, then decline the reward or reconsider the label.

GLBA limits how financial institutions share customers' nonpublic personal information with nonaffiliated third parties, so licensing customer files is a counsel-first question. De-identified process records, such as exception handling and underwriting or servicing workflows, are the realistic scope. Have counsel and your compliance officer confirm before anything is licensed.

A fintech or payments operator can sometimes license parts of its KYB work, such as internal procedures and de-identified decision logic, but usually not applicant documents, beneficial-owner personal data or anti-money-laundering filings. Advisors should screen for rights and confidentiality first and defer to the client's counsel and compliance lead.

Whether a former federal official can refer a government contractor depends on your former role, grade, agency guidance and federal post-employment rules such as 18 U.S.C. 207, not on SourceX. Do not assume a private introduction is exempt. Get written advice from your former agency's ethics office before referring a company you once dealt with.

Usually yes. A former owner or officer can bid for estate assets, but a sale to an insider draws closer scrutiny of price, marketing and good faith, and the trustee must show the deal is the best available. Marketing separable assets to outside buyers, such as a SourceX license of operational records, gives the trustee an independent value benchmark.

Yes. A former owner can introduce the company they sold but can no longer authorize a license; the new owner's authorized sponsor decides and signs. Credit goes to the first valid referrer whose introduction leads to a verified company application within the attribution window, so a reward needs that introduction to come first and a deal to close and be paid.

A fractional CFO can sign contracts on behalf of a company only when the company has granted actual authority, typically through an officer appointment or a board, manager or owner resolution covering that contract; the title alone is not enough. For a data license, a CFO who referred the company should disclose that and let another authorized person sign.

Freight brokerage data can often be licensed when it is the broker's own operating record: load tendering, carrier negotiation, tracking updates and exception handling. Shipper contract rates, confidential shipper information, carrier personal and banking details, and data governed by load board or telematics terms need checking first and are often excluded or redacted.

Yes. A fully remote company can license its data if it meets the usual baseline: a US company with 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded), several years of documented operations, rights to the records and an authorized sponsor. Remote teams often keep the fullest written record; the extra checks are multi-state notices, personal devices and workspace ownership.

Yes, if the records contain no protected health information and the company has the rights to license them. Billing-operations SOPs and workflow records are typical starting points. Anything with PHI needs HIPAA authorization or de-identification first. This is general information, not legal advice; confirm with counsel.

A business associate can de-identify PHI only if its business associate agreement permits that use, and the output must meet HIPAA's Safe Harbor or Expert Determination standard to stop being PHI. Whether it may then license the result depends on the BAA's ownership and commercial-use clauses, so read the agreement first.

Generally not for client matter content. A lawyer's confidentiality duty, set out in ABA Model Rule 1.6 as adopted by each state, covers information relating to a representation, so client files stay out of scope without informed client consent. Some firm-owned operational records, scrubbed of client information, may be considered with the firm's ethics counsel.

It can be, depending on your state's rules and your role in the client's matter. Model Rules 5.4 and 7.2 mainly govern lawyers sharing legal fees with nonlawyers or paying for recommendations. Being paid by a business for introducing a client is usually analyzed as a personal-interest conflict under Rule 1.7, which calls for informed client consent, confirmed in writing.

A limited partner can help a portfolio company reach SourceX, but should route the introduction through the GP rather than use confidential fund reports. The LPA and side letters set what contact is allowed. A GP-led path also keeps conflicts and attribution clear.

A management consultant can sometimes accept a referral fee, but consulting codes of ethics generally expect the client to be told and to consent first. Disclose any SourceX reward in writing before recommending an introduction, check your code and engagement letter, and consider declining the reward.

Yes. A US manufacturer can monetize data for AI by licensing office and quality workflow records, such as nonconformance reports, CAPAs, work instructions and engineering change orders, if it has 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded), years of history and the rights to the material. Customer drawings under NDA and export-controlled technical data stay out.

A non-debtor subsidiary of a Chapter 11 parent can in principle license its own records through SourceX, because its assets are generally not estate property. The parent's equity is, so the debtor in possession, lenders and sometimes the court take an interest. Shared systems and guarantees often decide the outcome.

Not as one pooled license. Each portfolio company owns its own records, holds its own rights and signs through its own authorized sponsor, so SourceX qualifies and licenses company by company. A PE firm can still coordinate several introductions at once, and the reward cap of {{cap}} applies to each referred company separately.

Yes, a PE firm can introduce a company it has already exited, but the new owner decides. After closing, the former sponsor has no say over the company's data. It can still introduce a CEO it knows well, provided the company meets the baseline and nothing in the sale agreement, such as a confidentiality covenant, restricts the outreach.

Not with one blanket registration. Under SourceX's published rule, referral credit is earned company by company: it goes to the first valid referrer whose introduction leads to a verified company application within the attribution window. A firm can register as a partner, then introduce each eligible current or future portfolio company separately; the signed agreement and terms govern anything else.

Yes. A company can license its data to AI companies when it owns the records, has 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded) and several years of documented operations, has an authorized executive to sign, and has checked sponsor, lender, customer and privacy commitments. It grants a license rather than selling the data, and it keeps ownership.

A Pennsylvania CPA can accept a referral fee only where both the state's rules and, for AICPA members, the AICPA Code allow it. The Code rules out commissions where the firm audits, reviews or performs certain other attest work for the client and requires permitted ones to be disclosed; Pennsylvania's CPA Law and State Board of Accountancy regulations may add requirements, so read them first.

Generally not on its own. A portfolio company's records belong to that operating company, not to the fund or its manager, and fund documents, confidentiality terms and privacy promises can limit sponsor-level use. The clean route is for each company to license its own records with board approval, with SourceX running the transaction and the company keeping ownership.

It depends on your role and what you signed. An operating partner's ability to accept a referral fee is usually governed by their employment or consulting agreement, the fund's LPA and the adviser's code of ethics, plus FINRA or professional rules if licensed. Get written clearance from compliance and disclose the payment before accepting any SourceX reward.

Yes. In most privately held corporations, licensing data is a board-level business decision rather than a shareholder vote, even with dozens or hundreds of employee or legacy holders. Shareholders usually vote only if the deal amounts to a sale of substantially all assets, or if the charter or a shareholder agreement reserves the decision. Counsel confirms which applies.

Yes, if the business meets the same baseline as a private company and the right people approve it. Inside a listed group, the parent's delegation of authority usually decides who can sign, so an exclusive data license often sits above a subsidiary president's limit. Expect group legal, the board or a committee, and disclosure counsel to join early.

Whether a real estate broker can accept a referral reward for a non-real-estate introduction depends on state license law, the supervising brokerage's outside-income policy and tax reporting. Check your state commission and managing broker first. Rewards are payable only after the buyer pays and SourceX receives its fee, and are not guaranteed.

A retired CPA may be able to earn a referral reward, but retirement alone does not settle it. The AICPA referral-fee rule centers on members in public practice and attest clients, and state boards add their own rules. Confirm your exact status with your state board in writing before accepting a reward.

It depends on your registrations and your firm more than on the introduction itself. Introducing a plan sponsor's company to SourceX concerns the employer's business records, not the plan or its assets. Whether you may accept a referral reward turns on your firm's outside-activity and compensation policies, FINRA rules if you are registered, and how ERISA treats your role.

Usually not: customer content in a SaaS product normally belongs to customers under the terms of service, and aggregated or usage-data clauses rarely reach AI training. The licensable layer is the company's own engineering, support and operating records, created by its employees, subject to rights review and counsel.

A vendor usually cannot terminate a contract or cut off service just because the customer filed for bankruptcy. The automatic stay generally bars terminating or suspending service to collect pre-filing debts, and the Bankruptcy Code generally limits clauses triggered by a filing. Vendors can still seek court relief, and unpaid post-filing invoices change the picture.

Often yes, in part. A staffing firm can usually license the operating history in its ATS, such as job orders, submittal-to-placement funnels, recruiter activity and outcomes, but not raw candidate profiles. Candidate personal data is removed or de-identified, and records that clients own, including RPO and MSP program data, stay out unless those clients consent.

Sometimes. Tax-only clients fall outside the AICPA attest-client bar, but disclosure is still expected, state boards can be stricter, and tax-return confidentiality limits how client information may be used. The compliant route is for the owner to ask for the introduction while you share only basic fit facts.

Owner-operators leased on as independent contractors do not count toward the baseline of 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded). A carrier can still qualify if its own staff, including company drivers, dispatchers, safety, billing, brokerage and maintenance employees, reached 50 or more full-time at peak and its dispatch and exception records go back years.

Often yes, but how depends on the setting. In bankruptcy, a sale or license of estate data outside the ordinary course goes through notice and a hearing, where stakeholders, potentially including a union, may object and the court decides. Outside court, a union's leverage comes from the collective bargaining agreement and labor law, so labor counsel should review first.

Yes. A US company owned by an employee ownership trust can license its data if it meets the usual baseline and the right people approve. The operating company signs as the owner of its records, but the trust agreement, bylaws and any seller-financing terms may require trustee or committee consent, so map those approvals before the first call.

A company can only license records it has rights to, but AI-generated documents add little value, and creating records with AI in order to sell them is a program red flag. Buyers want records of real human work, so owners date-scope archives to the period before AI writing tools became common.

An acquired company can often license its historical records if the data still exists and the current rights holder is authorized to sign. Check the purchase agreement for asset schedules, seller covenants and customer limits, then introduce the officer with authority rather than the system administrator.

Generally only to wind up its affairs. A company the state has administratively dissolved, often after a missed annual report, is usually limited to winding-up activity until it is reinstated, and the rules differ by state. Before signing a data license, the company should check its status with the Secretary of State and, in most cases, reinstate first.

Usually not directly. A power of attorney lets the agent act for the owner personally, for example voting the owner's shares or exercising membership rights, while company contracts such as a data license are signed by officers or managers with authority under the bylaws or operating agreement. The agent may, however, be able to change who those signers are.

An AI buyer can resell or sublicense licensed company data only if the agreement expressly allows it. A license grants a defined set of rights, and the company keeps ownership. Permitted use, sublicensing, transfer and end-of-term clauses decide what is possible, and nothing is binding until the company signs.