Search
Search guides, questions and resources
2382 results
- GuidesForm ADV Part 2A Item 14: how to disclose referral compensation
Form ADV Part 2A Item 14 asks a registered adviser to describe certain economic benefits received from non-clients and any payments made for client referrals. An adviser who might receive a reward for introducing a client's company to SourceX should ask compliance whether Item 14, or other brochure items, call for disclosure.
Read → - GuidesFormer employee mailboxes in Microsoft 365: cut license cost without losing records
You can usually stop paying a Microsoft 365 license for a departed employee without losing their email by preserving the mailbox first, either as an inactive mailbox under a retention policy or hold, or as a shared mailbox, and removing the license only afterward. Check Microsoft's current licensing documentation before deleting any account.
Read → - QuestionsFormer MSP won't return admin access: can the company still license its data?
Yes, a company whose former MSP won't give back admin credentials can still qualify, because holding passwords does not make the MSP the owner of its records. Admin control must come back first, through the services agreement and each vendor's owner-verification process. The incoming MSP is well placed to lead that recovery and then introduce the company.
Read → - ResourcesForwardable introduction blurb template: the paragraph an owner can pass on
A forwardable introduction blurb is a two-paragraph description of the opportunity that works without the sender: what the program is, what the company controls, and the first step. It contains no records or reward amounts, so an owner can forward it to a CFO or co-owner safely.
Read → - QuestionsFounder owns the IP, not the company: can the records still be licensed?
Only what the company actually holds can be licensed. Operating records staff create in company systems are generally the company's, but IP or records held personally by the founder must first be assigned, licensed in or approved in writing. M&A advisors already run this clean-up before a sale; the same steps apply.
Read → - ResourcesFounder Retirement: Data Opportunity Handoff Checklist
A data opportunity handoff checklist for a founder's retirement should verify the company meets SourceX's baseline, confirm licensing rights and an authorized sponsor, and detail archive types. Importantly, partners never handle company data.
Read → - GuidesFP&A software implementation: how many years of historical data to load
A common FP&A starting point is three full fiscal years plus year to date, and five for seasonal or reorganized businesses. The scoping also maps every source system and year range, which shows a fractional CFO how deep a client's records go before any older system is retired or purged.
Read → - GuidesFractional CFO AI services: where a data-licensing introduction fits
Fractional CFO firms packaging AI services can fit a data-licensing introduction at one point: after the systems inventory in an AI readiness engagement, and only with the owner's consent. Check your engagement letter, your firm's policy on referral compensation and your disclosure to the client first; the CFO then introduces, and SourceX handles qualification, terms and delivery.
Read → - GuidesFractional CFO demand in 2026: what the sourced data shows and what it means for you
Fractional CFO demand in 2026 is widely reported as rising, but the size of the increase depends on the source, and many figures come from firms selling fractional services. The structural point is clearer: fractional CFOs see systems, history and owners across several clients, which makes them natural introducers for clients that may license their records.
Read → - GuidesFractional CFO for distribution companies: how to spot data licensing fits
A fractional CFO working on a distributor's pricing or ERP project can spot a data licensing fit in years of quote, order and service records, but must first check fee and independence rules. Qualifying companies need 50+ full-time employees at peak and an authorized sponsor; SourceX handles everything after the introduction.
Read → - GuidesFractional CFO subcontractor agreements: who may introduce a client, and how to agree it
In a fractional CFO subcontractor agreement, the client-ownership, non-solicitation, confidentiality and outside-activity clauses usually decide who may introduce a client to SourceX. Because SourceX credits only the first valid referrer, the CFO firm and its 1099 CFO should agree in writing who asks the owner and who registers the introduction before anyone acts.
Read → - ComparisonsFractional CFO vs CAS firm: who is better placed to spot licensable records?
A fractional CFO is usually better placed to raise data licensing, because they sit with the CEO and board. A client accounting services (CAS) team is better placed to spot the evidence, because it sees payroll, software bills and years of ledger history every month. The strongest approach combines both, within each firm's fee and independence rules.
Read → - GuidesFractional CFO's First Month: A Data Licensing Referral Plan
For fractional CFOs, a successful first month in data licensing referrals involves systematically identifying eligible clients, making warm introductions, and diligently tracking the attribution window. Focus on understanding the value proposition for your clients and ensuring they meet SourceX's criteria.
Read → - GuidesFractional CFOs for contractors: spotting data licensing candidates in WIP reviews
A fractional CFO for contractors is well placed to spot data licensing candidates, because monthly WIP and job-cost reviews show how deep a client's estimating, change-order and project records go. Screen clients with 50+ full-time employees at peak, several years of job history and clear rights, check your own fee and independence rules, then introduce them to SourceX.
Read → - GuidesFractional CFOs for franchisors: franchisor vs franchisee records
A fractional CFO for a franchisor can introduce clients to SourceX when the franchisor has 50+ full-time employees at peak, years of its own manuals, field visit reports and support tickets, and clear rights. Franchisee employees do not count, and franchisee or customer data stays out of scope.
Read → - GuidesFractional CFOs for insurance agencies: spotting agency-owned records worth licensing
A fractional CFO for insurance agencies is well placed to spot a data licensing fit, because commission reconciliation runs through the agency management system and shows how many years of service notes and renewal workflows exist. Agency-owned process records may qualify; insured nonpublic personal information and carrier-restricted material do not. The principal decides whether to explore it.
Read → - GuidesFractional CFOs for staffing agencies: ATS history, candidate data and headcount
A fractional CFO for a staffing agency can spot a data-licensing fit in years of ATS job orders, submittals and placement outcomes. Before raising a SourceX introduction, check internal full-time headcount against the 50+ full-time employees at peak baseline (contractors excluded), state temporary associates separately, and plan to remove candidate personal data unless a licensing basis exists.
Read → - GuidesFractional CFOs outside the US with US clients: a referral playbook
A fractional CFO outside the US can introduce US clients that hold years of connected records to SourceX without handling any data. Screen for 50+ full-time employees at peak, rights and an authorized sponsor, raise it during migrations or audits, and check your engagement letter and professional rules first.
Read → - GuidesFractional COOs: how to handle the operations team's worries about a data license
A fractional COO handles an operations team's data-license worries by naming the three fears early (extra workload, being monitored, being replaced), limiting staff effort to a system inventory and a few decisions, and framing the license as existing records rather than new tracking. Introduce the idea to the CEO first, and keep the project owned inside the company.
Read → - GuidesFractional CTOs: Spotting Data Referral Opportunities in GitHub Projects
Fractional CTOs working on GitHub projects can identify data referral opportunities by looking for client attributes like US operations, 50+ peak employees, and a history of data generation. These insights can lead to significant rewards by connecting companies with SourceX for data licensing.
Read → - ComparisonsFractional vs outsourced vs virtual CFO: what is the difference?
A fractional CFO is a named senior executive working part time inside several companies; an outsourced CFO is a firm-delivered service, often bundled with accounting staff; a virtual CFO delivers mostly remote, packaged reporting and forecasting. The models differ most in who sits with the owner and board, which shapes who can raise a SourceX introduction.
Read → - QuestionsFriendly foreclosure under Article 9: which records move to the lender's newco?
A friendly foreclosure is a consensual Article 9 sale in which a borrower in default cooperates while its secured lender, or a newco the lender forms, takes the collateral, usually without a bankruptcy case. Books, records and data move only if the collateral description and sale documents include them, and customer data still carries the borrower's privacy promises.
Read → - GuidesFTC algorithmic disgorgement and why AI buyers want licensed, documented data
FTC algorithmic disgorgement is a remedy in which a regulator orders a company to delete models built on improperly obtained data. Buyers therefore insist on documented rights, and suppliers protect themselves by checking privacy promises, excluding third-party records and fixing scope in writing before licensing.
Read → - ResourcesFTC disclosure examples for advisors who mention a referral program
If you publicly recommend a referral program and may be paid, the FTC Endorsement Guides in 16 CFR Part 255 treat that payment as a material connection that readers should be told about, clearly and near the recommendation. Whether the rules reach a specific post depends on the facts, so confirm with counsel.
Read → - GuidesFTC Safeguards Rule for CPA firms: what it means for client records and referrals
The FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) treats tax preparation firms as financial institutions, so a CPA firm must protect client information under a written security program and can never license client files. A CPA can still introduce a client's operating business to SourceX, with the client's permission, while sharing nothing from the firm's files.
Read → - QuestionsFunctional vs symbolic IP under ASC 606: how is a license recognized?
Under ASC 606, a license of functional IP, such as software or completed media, usually gives a right to use the IP as it exists, recognized at a point in time; a license of symbolic IP, such as a brand, gives a right to access it, recognized over time. A data license's treatment depends on its terms.
Read → - GuidesGDPR further processing: can operational data be reused for AI training?
GDPR purpose limitation means personal data collected for one purpose can be reused for AI training only if the new purpose is compatible under Article 6(4) or has its own lawful basis. Because that is hard to show for mailboxes and tickets, US companies often exclude or anonymize EU records first.
Read → - GuidesGeneral counsel at a PE-backed company: reviewing a data license
A general counsel at a PE-backed company should confirm rights by record type, customer and employee contract terms, agreed de-identification scope, sponsor and lender consents, and the exclusivity term before the company signs a data license. Nothing is binding until the company agrees price and terms and signs.
Read → - ResourcesGitHub Inventory Template for SourceX Company Introductions
Yes, we provide a metadata-only GitHub inventory template designed to help you prepare companies for introduction to SourceX, focusing on record types and date ranges without any actual data. This ensures partners never handle company data directly.
Read → - GuidesGLBA reuse and redisclosure: can vendors use bank customer data?
Under GLBA privacy rules, a vendor that receives nonpublic personal information from a bank under an exception can generally use and disclose it only to carry out that exception's activity. Licensing it for AI training is usually outside that scope, so vendors should limit licenses to their own records.
Read → - GuidesGo-to-market operating partners in PE: the role, the CRM review and a records screen
A go-to-market operating partner in private equity is the sponsor's commercial specialist, working with portfolio CEOs and CROs on pricing, sales effectiveness and retention by auditing CRM hygiene, call recordings, quote histories and win-loss notes. That review can also flag companies whose sales and service records could support a one-time data license through SourceX, introduced without sharing any records.
Read → - ComparisonsGoing-concern sale vs piecemeal liquidation: which route protects the records?
Choose a going-concern sale when a buyer will pay for the operating business; the records travel with it. Choose piecemeal liquidation when the parts are worth more than the whole; then records are usually orphaned. In that case, carve out a SourceX records license before assets are dispersed, while systems and people still exist.
Read → - GuidesGot a data offer after an acquisition announcement? What sellers and advisors should do
When a data buyer makes an offer after an acquisition is announced or closed, do not reply with terms. Pause, have counsel check the purchase agreement, the transition services agreement and the data-rights representations, confirm who owns each record set after closing, and only then compare an ad hoc sale with a managed, exclusive licensing process such as SourceX.
Read → - GuidesGradual business ownership transition: when to raise data licensing with the owner
In a gradual business ownership transition, raise data licensing while the founding owner still controls the company's systems and can sign as its authorized sponsor, ideally before the first transfer of control. Afterward, a new majority owner, board or successor must approve any license, and legacy archives may already have been migrated or switched off.
Read → - GuidesGuides: Helping Clients License Business Data to AI Labs
This guide helps client-facing advisors understand how to introduce their clients to SourceX for data licensing. It clarifies the advisor's role, client control over data, eligible company profiles, and the conditions for advisor rewards. The guide also covers how to discuss data types and address client questions about monetization and data rights.
Read → - ResourcesHeadcount planning template with a peak full-time headcount line
A headcount planning template lists each role by department and month, with start dates, salary bands and status. Add three fields, monthly full-time count, a peak-month flag and systems used, and the same model shows whether a company reaches 50+ full-time employees at peak (contractors excluded).
Read → - ResourcesHealthcare Administration Data Referral Screening Worksheet
Yes, this article provides a structured screening worksheet specifically designed for referring healthcare administration businesses, built upon SourceX's core qualification criteria. It helps advisors quickly assess potential leads for data licensing opportunities.
Read → - GuidesHealthcare contact center recordings: HIPAA, consent and licensing
Patient call recordings held by a covered entity are usually protected health information, so licensing them generally requires HIPAA authorization or de-identification, plus a separate recording-consent check. Non-patient business calls are analyzed differently. SourceX agrees redaction requirements with the company before any work begins.
Read → - GuidesHealthcare services PE exit readiness: licensing administrative records, never PHI
For a PE-backed healthcare services company preparing for exit, only non-PHI administrative and operational records are candidates for an AI data license: finance, procurement, IT service desk history, policies and SOPs. Patient charts, claims and other PHI stay out of scope unless de-identified under HIPAA's standard or authorized, so screen carefully before any introduction.
Read → - GuidesHigh-ticket referral program scam checklist: warning signs before you sign up
A high-ticket referral program is likely predatory if it charges you to join, ties your pay to the size of a client's refund or credit, asks you to collect or upload client records, describes earnings as certain, or has no written terms naming who pays you and when. Legitimate programs pay from their own collected fee after a defined outcome.
Read → - GuidesHigh-ticket vs low-ticket referral programs: which strategy fits your network
High-ticket referral programs, such as M&A introductions or company data licensing, pay rarely but meaningfully after long cycles; low-ticket programs, such as software sign-up bonuses, pay small amounts often. Professionals who can reach company decision-makers are better placed for a few high-ticket introductions, while broad, shallow audiences suit high-volume programs.
Read → - GuidesHIPAA and AI training data: what the rules allow and what stays out of a license
HIPAA generally bars licensing protected health information to an AI developer without patient authorization, another permitted pathway or documented de-identification under 45 CFR 164.514. Ordinary business records of a healthcare administrator, without embedded PHI, are assessed like any other company records. Counsel decides each case.
Read → - ComparisonsHIPAA safe harbor vs expert determination: which fits business records?
HIPAA safe harbor removes 18 listed identifiers from structured data, while expert determination relies on a qualified expert documenting that re-identification risk is very small. Safe harbor suits clean tables; expert determination suits free text and dense data. SourceX treats PHI-adjacent records with neither one nor a valid authorization as a red flag.
Read → - GuidesHoldco capital allocation: where one-time proceeds such as a data license fit
Holdco capital allocation is the ongoing decision about where each operating company's cash goes: reinvestment, new acquisitions, debt paydown, buybacks or distributions, each judged against the holdco's return hurdle. One-time proceeds, such as a data license payment, belong in that framework but should fund one-off uses and never be valued as if they were recurring earnings.
Read → - GuidesHoldco playbook: shared services, capital allocation and a subsidiary records register
A holdco playbook sets how a holding company buys and keeps businesses: acquisition criteria, a small central team, shared finance, IT and HR, a capital allocation rule and one reporting rhythm. Add a subsidiary records register listing each company's systems, years of history, export owner and rights, so you can see which subsidiaries could license their records.
Read → - ComparisonsHoldco vs search fund vs independent sponsor: what differs and who approves a license
A search fund backs one searcher to buy and run a single company with investors on the board; a holdco buys businesses to keep indefinitely and allocates cash from the center; an independent sponsor finds a deal, then raises equity for it from capital partners. In each, the operating company signs a data license, but different people approve it.
Read → - GuidesHolding company IT shared services: who controls subsidiary data and who owns it
In a holding company IT shared services model, the parent's team usually runs subsidiary tenants, sign-in and backups, but control is not ownership: each operating subsidiary generally owns the records its business created. Before any SourceX data license, map who administers each system, which entity owns the records, and which officer is authorized to sign.
Read → - ResourcesHolding company subsidiary review template with a records and rights check
A holding company subsidiary review template should cover results against plan, capital, people, risks and decision rights, plus a short records and rights check. Add five metadata-only questions on systems, years of history, rights, an authorized sponsor and red flags, so each subsidiary is screened once a year for a possible data license through SourceX.
Read →